PhilosophyTextbook

Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics

Not rated yetRate this book

Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics examines competing ways to justify moral judgements. Edited by George Matthews within Christina Hendricks’s philosophy series, it introduces relativism, religion, virtue, self-interest, consequences, duties, feminism and evolutionary approaches.

FormatPDF
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPhilosophy
LevelNot specified
No. of pages118
Published2019
Read free online →

Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics source title pageFree

About this book

This multi-author introductory textbook treats ethics as an inquiry into the reasons behind moral judgement. Its opening distinguishes descriptions of moral behaviour, arguments about what should be done and questions about the status of moral claims themselves. Eight substantive chapters introduce major approaches without reducing the subject to a list of rules. The introduction also places theories in conversation with disagreements about character, self-interest, religion, power and human nature. The volume belongs to the Rebus Community’s Introduction to Philosophy series and is intended to support introductory philosophical study.

The attached edition contains 118 PDF pages, including front matter. Cover: source edition title page rendered from the PDF. The textbook and its original notices are retained; Academic Master’s study material is separate from the source text.

Book summary

Study overview of the reviewed opening

George Matthews begins with familiar moral dilemmas and asks what it would mean to examine them critically. Moral philosophy addresses both particular choices and the assumptions supporting judgements about right and wrong. The introduction treats ethical reasoning as an inquiry that goes beyond custom, received opinions and immediate feelings.

Three approaches organise that inquiry. Descriptive ethics investigates how people actually deliberate and behave. Normative ethics examines the case for principles that should guide action. Metaethics steps back to ask about the justification and status of moral thinking itself. Keeping these questions distinct helps a student recognise whether a passage explains behaviour, recommends a standard or challenges the basis of moral evaluation.

The introduction then outlines the volume’s theoretical sequence: relativism, religious approaches, virtue, egoism and social contracts, utilitarianism, Kantian duty, feminist ethics and evolutionary ethics. It identifies connections and disagreements between approaches rather than presenting a single settled answer. Character, outcomes, autonomy and social power become different points of entry into moral reflection. This guide summarises the introduction’s framing and chapter overview; it does not substitute for the arguments developed within the eight chapters.

Book contents

  1. Aren’t Right and Wrong Just Matters of Opinion? On Moral Relativism and Subjectivism
  2. Can We Have Ethics without Religion? On Divine Command Theory and Natural Law Theory
  3. How Can I Be a Better Person? On Virtue Ethics
  4. What’s in it for Me? On Egoism and Social Contract Theory
  5. Utilitarianism
  6. Kantian Deontology
  7. Feminism and Feminist Ethics
  8. Evolutionary Ethics

Questions for study

The following prompts are Academic Master’s editorial material.

  • How do descriptive, normative and metaethical questions differ?
  • What would count as a reason for accepting a moral principle?
  • How might two theories frame the same dilemma differently?

Sources and coverage

Introduction to the Book read in full (PDF pages 17–20); contributors, licence and contents checked.

Source edition · Source licence

About access & copyright

Check this edition’s source and licence before reusing its files or content. A library listing does not grant additional rights.

Read our Library Access & Copyright policy

Kinds of ethical inquiry

Distinguish descriptive, normative and metaethical approaches.

Reasons and assumptions

Examine the basis of moral judgement.

Theoretical comparison

Identify the introduction’s map of competing approaches.

Critical reading

Separate an author’s argument from an unexamined moral opinion.

Reader ratings & reviews

Be the first to rate

No ratings yet

0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%

Share your thoughts

Your review helps other students choose the right resources.

Rate this book

How helpful was this book?No sign-up needed. Your rating appears instantly.