Abstract India has seen a great deal of controversy and discussion surrounding the idea of Uniform Civil Code (UCC), mainly because of its potential effects on the nation’s diverse religious and cultural environment. The goal of the Uniform Civil Code is to replace the personal rules that are based on the scriptures and practices of each major religious community with a single set of regulations that apply to all Indian

When analyzing the first chat about the ‘’Theory of Child Protection,’’ it is essential to note that social and legal requirements for child protection originate from historical precedents. Firstly, the protection of the child was based on values including independence, privacy, and parental rights, which first led to the abuse of children coming from poor or vulnerable families where they ended up being neglected and placed in institutions or put

Abstract The Shimla Agreement, signed between India and Pakistan in July 1972, marked a significant turning point in the bilateral relations between the two countries following the 1971 war. This paper critically examines the objectives, provisions, and consequences of the Shimla Agreement, assessing its impact on diplomatic, political, and military relations between India and Pakistan. The analysis considers both immediate and long-term effects, including border demarcation, the Kashmir issue, bilateral

As a policy analyst, I have chosen to work for a government agency so that I can effectively analyze, evaluate, develop, and implement public policies for the government. The role would also enable me to successfully read, evaluate, and comprehend statistics on existing public policies for government or businesses. The focus as a policy analyst will be on the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) Strategic Plan for the period of

The article selected to support the argument that eyewitness testimony of children is reliable is titled “Reliability of Children’s Testimony in the Era of Developmental Reversals”, as it challenges the assumption that false memory reports are mostly associated with children than adults. The article quotes research from the 1980s, which shows that reversals in memory between early childhood and young adulthood decline under controlled conditions (Li & Koenig, 2023). The

What were the major terms and consequences of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo? The “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” established the border between Mexico and Texas and ceded over half of the northernmost lands of Mexico to the United States. The treaty effectively ended the Mexican-American war, limited Mexico’s powers, and shaped the geographical boundaries of the United States (What the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo Actually Says – Race, Politics, Justice,

The main point selected from the “Pro Section” is “The second amendment is not an unlimited or individual right to own guns” (Gun Control – Pros & Cons – ProCon.Org). The “District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme Court” case clarified the Second Amendment, which safeguards the right of an individual to hold weapons on lawful grounds, including self-protection. This point highlights the striking balance between public safety and individual rights,

The United States Constitution “the World’s most enduring symbol of democracy” is the supreme law and legislation of the U.S. that establishes the “structure and functions of the federal government” (Krutz and Waskiewicz). The Constitution also establishes the rights and responsibilities of the people as well as the states undertaking certain “civil rights” and “civil liberties” to the U.S. natives. Civil liberties are the protections that the federal authorities are

The corporations in the United States unlike people do not merit constitutional rights, but the individuals that come together to act in such corporations have the full array of rights every citizen in any country should have. This narrows down the very existence of corporations in the business World. However, corporations have been treated as individuals in limited ways for some legal purposes including the right to enter into contracts,

“The Positivist School of Jurisprudential Thought” vastly follows the concise insight and explanation of the natural origin of law to uphold the values and principles of a society. It is more effective at upholding the values of society and rational independence for the measurement and quantification of criminal behavior than any other competing school of thought. Among other schools of jurisprudential thought, the Positivist school offers a concise thought that

Part 1 Review Fig.1 on p. 6 of the Medical Professionalism article. Selected are two outcomes that are important to you (or that you want to achieve in your professional career) and explain how to develop those abilities. Undoubtedly, the development of a professional career needs immense attention towards betterment. In this regard, the outcome that I wish to develop is a connection with patients at their level concerning the

White-collar crimes are denoted by deceit, mistrust, concealment, and financial misappropriations. Physical force is not often applied to advance white-collar crimes because the techniques often used to advance such crimes are embezzlement, bribery, credit card fraud, trade secret theft, economic espionage, and computer manipulation. These crimes are mostly committed by government officials and professionals in the corporate sector. This essay evaluates white-collar crimes from the perspective of Reiman’s argument, “The rich

The democratic system in the United States is the world’s most ethnically and economically diversified system. However, economic progress is not evenly distributed among the population because of the systemic marginalization of people of colour in American society on the basis of racial discrimination. Treating Blacks and other people of colour unfairly across the criminal justice system subsequently leads to public mistrust due to unwarranted racial inequities. The main factors

Different social factors in the environment can have an impact on health. These impacts are known as Social Determinant of Health (SDH); these include places where people may work, live, play and learn. These can affect life negatively, leading to adverse effects on health. The social determinants are linked not only to living or working environments but also to socioeconomic conditions, which can lead to the inability to afford medical

Undoubtedly, the law has diversified definitions with multiple dimensions and directions regarding the legal system theory. However, some systematic written or conventional rules are what is termed as the sources of law. There are two main types of sources of law, mainly primary sources and secondary sources, from a broad perspective. Concisely, the primary sources can be enlisted as the constitution, state rules, regulations and common law to ensure the

Question no. 01: Explain why Michelle Alexander’s book is titled The New Jim Crow. Michelle’s “The New Jim Crow” is a stunning account of the former practice of segregation and the rebirth of the racial caste-like system for Black people, in particular in the United States. The term “Jim Crow” refers to the racial discrimination enforced by practices and customs and justifies severe inequality and segregation of the Blacks. Michelle,

Abstract The paper argues the current state of organized crime and the rationale for considering it a primary priority of U.S. Law Enforcement. In the last three decades, organized crime and technology have grown rapidly at a similar velocity to globalization. The global integration of world economy, politics, and society through Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) has ushered a new wave of organized crime where the enemy is necessarily not

The crime of the Shafia murder case took place in Kingston, Ohio, on June 30th, 2009. Three daughters of Mohammad Shafia were the victims, along with the first wife. This case is one of the many examples of crime against women. For years, the reasons behind the occurrence of these crimes have been an area of interest for sociologists and criminologists. This essay analyses the Shafia murder case and establishes

Case 1: Truman v. Thomas The Truman v. Thomas case was established on the surgeon’s failure to reveal the risks of disallowing a diagnostic test to the patient to help her make an informed decision. The patient ultimately died from cancer of the cervix. The respondent, Dr. Claude Thomas, was a family physician for Rena Truman from 1963 to 1969; during that time, he offered her medical advice. In 1969,

Case 1: the State of Tennessee v. Mary Northern This case is about Ms. Northern, a 72-year-old lady. She suffered from gangrene on both her legs and did not have anyone to care for her as she lived alone. She was receiving treatment from the Nashville General Hospital. Over time, her ailment worsened to the point that amputation of both her legs was prescribed by the doctor. This course of