Introduction
America has remained home to many outsiders since its discovery in 1492. The Spanish first explored it in an expedition led by Christopher Columbus. The Spanish Empire colonized America and took control of a major portion of America between the 15th and 19th centuries. The Spanish came to America for trade purposes and to spread Christianity among the newly discovered inhabitants. Columbus and his successors made the first Spanish settlement in the late 15th century. This settlement changed America’s existing political, social, and religious concepts, and the majority accepted Christianity as a result of efforts by Spanish preachers. In the mid-16th century, the British visited North America, starting a war between Spain and England to take over trade and colonization. Finally, the English won the war and took control of North America. In the following paragraphs, we will discuss the major differences between Spanish and British colonization in America, their positive and negative effects on the population, how they shaped America’s politics, society, and religious concepts, and why British colonization was better than Spanish colonization.
Discussion
The diversity of the United States in religion, politics, social issues, and economy relates to the colonization by the British and Spanish. The first difference between British and Spanish colonization is the difference in religion that the Spanish and British brought with them. Both Spanish and British colonization had a significant effect on the religious beliefs of the North American colonies. Most of the English colonists were Puritans. In the last half of the seventeenth century, Quakers overcame the Puritans. Quakers believed that neither the Bible nor preachers were necessary to worship God (Roark, p. 79). When the British started colonizing America, most of the colonists were Quakers. Colonists with other religions, such as Puritans, Orthodox, Baptists, and Lutherans, started settling. The emphasis on religion was less in the Chesapeake towns, where the natives’ whole focus was on the cultivation of tobacco, and they left religion aside (Roark, p. 60). The religion, as presented by the Spanish, was the pure Christian faith, and they executed whoever opposed the pure Christian faith, such as Protestants and Quakers. While English colonies were busy cultivating tobacco, the Spanish conquered New Mexico and Florida. Instead of involving themselves in cultivating tobacco, the Spanish started efforts to convert Native Indians, who were mainly Angolan, to Christianity (Roark, p. 65). The Spanish started civilizing Native Americans and introduced them to advanced concepts of farming, cattle breeding, weaponry, and tools; they also introduced the concept of equality to men and abolished slavery. The natives then became attracted to Spanish missionary preaching and anti-slavery concepts, and a huge portion accepted Christianity as their faith. Several Catholic churches were built in Mexico and Florida. There was some opposition to Spanish preaching, such as the Pueblo Revolt, led by the Pope in 1680, in which they burned images of Christ and the Virgin Mary and abolished churches. In the next paragraph, we will discuss the British and Spanish politics brought to America.
The politics and governance of the colonies were as diverse as religion. Puritans mostly controlled the British colonies in the seventeenth century. The Massachusetts Bay Company was founded in 1629 and given control of the General Court. The company stockholders were called freemen. The Puritans presented a Royal charter in the General Court that permitted the Massachusetts Bay Company to be run in the American colonies rather than in England. This action by the Puritans enabled them to take control of the government in present-day Massachusetts. The Spanish government in the Florida and New Mexico colonies was mainly controlled by viceroys and governors, who were directly appointed by the king. The laws that were implemented in the colonies were directly given by the king, and colonists had to obey these orders at any cost. Most of the Protestants were killed as they opposed the laws enforced on them. The Pueblo Revolt opposed not only the religion imposed on them but also the strict government laws enforced on them by the Spanish. The British relationship with Native Americans helped them trade, and they generated revenue by cultivating crops. The colonies of Maryland, Virginia, and Carolina were fully developed by the start of the eighteenth century, grew staple crops for export, and provided livelihoods to many Native Americans. The British colonists had the concept that all men are created equal and deserve equal rights irrespective of their race and color. Many poor natives who were inspired by British equality concepts flocked to the British colonies, and many Indians converted to Protestantism; this is different from what happened in New Mexico and Florida, where Catholic missionaries imposed religion on them. The forced labor system of “Encomienda” that the Spanish tried to impose on natives was never accepted by the British colonists. They rejected the concept of slavery, but in contradiction, they still made many Indians and Africans their slaves and defined themselves as superior to them. Next, we will discuss the points based on the colonies’ economic structure.
In British colonies, the economy was based on farming and trade. As the soil of New England was rocky, it did not permit the traditional type of farming that was done in the fertile soil of England. The British colonists were forced by the government to become involved in trade with the Native Indians to obtain pelts of furry animals as they were in great demand in England (Roark, p. 77). While they searched for furry animals, they found vast forests that could be used for timber; timber and pelts then became some of the highest-earning trade items. Another big trade item was codfish, which was abundant on the New England coast and played a huge role in the growing economy of England. The soil of the New Netherland colonies was rich in fertility; wheat was cultivated in abundance, and wheat flour was the number one export item from the middle colonies (Roark, p. 96). The second biggest trade item was tobacco, which was cultivated in southern colonies. As the cultivation of tobacco required effort, the farmers were mostly slaves whom the colonists bought to perform heavy tasks. The concept of slavery was similar in the British and Spanish colonies, but the difference lay in enforcement. The British intelligently used Native Indians for their benefit, but the Spanish opted for the way of enforcement. This can be seen from the opposition that started against them as they forced the Native Indians to work for the Spanish monarchy (Roark, p. 46).
Conclusion
Based on the facts that we found in the book, it can be concluded that British colonization was better than Spanish colonization of America. The enforcement of religion and slavery, like many other examples in history, has never made any nation obey the rules of the oppressor, and the same thing happened with Spanish colonization, which eventually led to failure. Governments, while making new settlements, should apply an intelligent approach while colonizing new populations. As we see from British rule in North and South America, for a nation to work under another nation’s rule, the rulers have to be gentle and intelligent while presenting religion and new concepts to the new colony.
Works Cited
Roark, James L., et al. The American Promise, Volume I: To 1877: A History of the United States. Vol. 1. Macmillan, 2012.
Academic Master Education Team is a group of academic editors and subject specialists responsible for producing structured, research-backed essays across multiple disciplines. Each article is developed following Academic Master’s Editorial Policy and supported by credible academic references. The team ensures clarity, citation accuracy, and adherence to ethical academic writing standards
Content reviewed under Academic Master Editorial Policy.
- Editorial Staff
- Editorial Staff
- Editorial Staff

