The Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) was passed in the year 2003 with huge support from the Congress. The main reason why the act was passed and supported is a way of providing an analysis of the Rape cases as well as the effects of prison rape in the states and providing adequate information on crime in the local institution. We are all in agreement that the police, the employees in the police institution or prisons, should not harass the arrestee sexually. However, they should safeguard their custody and make sure that wherever they are around the jail institution, they are safe.
That is the primary role of the Prison Rape Elimination Act, which enforces the law by preventing harassment as well as assaults. PREA addresses sexual assault of the people who are held in custody as well as identifying the police temporary holdings cells and lockups. PREA has set up a commission known as the National Prison Elimination Commission, whose purpose is to gather the appropriate information identifying the problem, hold the hearing in the country on prison rape and, more importantly, develop standards to prevent prison or custody rape cases (Manual, 2017). After Congress passed PREA, it tried to reduce sexual assault cases in prison. The legislators were to create a department which was to deal with these cases as well as set tolerance policies towards the abuse of inmates. The department would ensure that the inmates get screened to identify them. Additionally, correctional officers should be instructed on behaviour which constitutes sexual abuse, and abusers should get punished accordingly. BPunishingthe abusers will act as a warning to the guards or police who may have an idea of sexually assaulting the arrestee. Before the department was set, many inmates were raped and heard of Millions of people being attacked, unheard or talked out.
Sexual abuse is not an inevitable characteristic of incarnation since leadership administrators are creating a culture which will promote and facilitate safety for the inmates. Some reports that were released by the Human right acted as a catalyst in creating public awareness of prison rape which, as a result, federal legislation was pushed to address the issue of sexual assault behind bars. Many considered the legislative protection of the prisoners as a way of creating and expanding their legal rights. The proposed solutions to storage cases have developed the prisoners’ right to sue the correctional officials to represent a sensible solution to the issue that has been unnoticed and has been unheard of for a longer period.
However, despite the fact that it took a long time, like a period of ten years, for PREA to meet its standards, it has finally come to be. They have reached their goal of trying to eliminate the cases of prison rape, and the commission that was created has enabled PREA to collect adequate information, which has helped it meet its standard. The services offered to the victims, such as a confidential rape crisis hotline, mental health counselling, medical exams carried out by sexual assault nurses, and advocating victims’ rights, give the victims opportunity the right to open up whenever they are assaulted and feel that they have a right to report the act (Robertson, 2004)
Nevertheless, PREA has made many efforts in trying to eliminate the Prison Rape and Assault cases, but there many things they should have considered. Research should not be conducted once, and a solution should be developed since things change over time. Therefore I would suggest that the research and investigations be carried out frequently like after every five years. Hence, this will enable PREA and the commission to gather information about sexual assault behind bars. PREA should have set up agencies that were required to impose disciplinary measures if the staff did not report their idea or provide enough information related to sexual abuse. Our systems are the main problem since they run on a culture of violence where every official is driven by power and sex, too. Therefore, if we change the culture within our jail system, we can be in a position to diminish prison rape cases entirely. Administrators in prisons and jails must be willing to come up with solutions on how to restore justice as well as reduce violence by implementing programs and coming up with a number of them.
When these approaches and applications are applied by staff in uniform as well as the administrators, they will create a space for reducing sexual assault as well as demanding accountability from the correctional individuals and inmates, hence ensuring that each person respects the values of humanity (Manual, 2017).
Ted Koppel was a BBC reporter who reported a rampant case in American correctional facilities where inmates undergo a lot of harassment as well as rape by the officials and administrator. His report was an eye-opener since it made Citizens understand how the American Correctional facilities had people who did not value humanity. After interviewing some inmates, they described how prison was a threat like any other deadly disease like AIDS and cancer. A cook, Mr. Kerry, was raped, and after some DNA tests, it was indeed the truth that he was assaulted and sexually harassed (KOPPEL, 2017). After revealing their experiences, it becomes an eye-opener for the legislator to come up with the Prison Rape Elimination Act.
References
Manual, N. C. (2017). Prison Rape Elimination Act. POLICY, 902, 1.
Robertson, J. E. (2004). The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: A Primer. CRIMINAL LAW BULLETIN-BOSTON-., 40(3), 270-279.
KOPPEL, S. (2017). Hot House: Leavenworth Prison.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
