Define and discuss conflict management styles – focusing on managing conflicts within a group situation. Identify and discuss at least three (3) difference conflict management styles used within groups. Define and discuss decision-making. Do not elaborate on the higher-level topic of problem-solving (decision-making is a process within problem-solving).
Introduction to Conflict Management
Conflict management is an essential component of the group process, fundamental for dealing with disputes positively and minimizing adverse outcomes. Effective conflict management is necessary for groups to avoid critical situations, promote cooperation, and maintain a valuable and friendly atmosphere where production can be maximized (Kuhn & Poole, 2000). Leadership style has a marked impact on conflict management styles within teams. Transformational leadership favors great inspiration or motivation and has safeguards for unity, meaning integration and problem-solving to become productive (Saeed et al., 2014). According to study, coercive and legitimate power are related to different conflict management styles. They emphasize the relationship between power structures and conflict-resolution strategies (Rilasi & Azadzashashah, 2016).
In other words, conflicts and the organizational contexts are essential in determining the best conflict management style. For instance, to get people from different cultures to get along better, intercultural conflicts require unique management strategies to help them understand one another. This was propagated and reaffirmed in Ramayan et al.’s 2020 conflict study. Planting the right measure of conflict resolution (even to the avoidance level) is essential for creating an organization where workers perform better overall (Egerová & Rotenbornová, 2021).
Overview of Conflict Management Styles
Conflict management is a critical element of group dynamics and seeks to address the conflicts that may appear within a team to eliminate them. Individual or organizational conflict management strategies encompass different styles. Conflict management means controlling disagreements between people or groups to avoid all-out conflict. Competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating are the primary conflict management styles (Maharjan & Shakya, 2022). In specific settings, collaboration is the style of choice. This approach emphasizes finding solutions that can satisfy all parties involved. Compromising is another standard style, where individuals seek a middle ground to resolve conflicts (Maharjan & Shakya, 2022). By accommodating people’s needs, people above one’s own, irritations and friction problems will be minimized in a group situation.
Avoiding is characterized by evasion, where conflict is put off or delayed resolution; this might be suitable for minor points when emotions run high. Competing involves a high level of confidence and low cooperation, where one side tries to win at the other’s expense (Maharjan & Shakya, 2022) It has been revealed through empirical research that choosing a conflict management style is part of the power dynamics within an organization because different kinds of powers are associated with different conflict management styles. Therefore, Riasi and Asadzadeh (2016) underscore the connection between power structures and conflict resolution. Moreover, leadership styles play an essential role in managing conflicts within a group. For example, transformational leadership is associated with an integrative conflict management style, emphasizing collaboration and problem-solving (Hunitie, 2016).
Furthermore, the nature of the conflict affects the type of conflict management. For example, in the case of relational tensions, some styles are more appropriate than others. Resource allocation is another type of conflict. It is well documented in the literature that different styles are suitable for dealing with specific conflict situations. For example, when conflicts involve relationship tensions or resource allocations, certain styles, such as voting, are sometimes more appropriate (Farah & Rashid, 2019).
Knowing the relationship between conflict types and conflict management styles in different scenarios is crucial to treat any conflicts effectively. If organizations have endless conflicts, their organizational performance will not be good. Conflict management styles can impact organizational performance. Integrating, compromising, and obliging, which are cooperative styles, produce positive outcomes, while noncooperative styles like avoiding and dominating may negatively affect performance (Behluli & Qerimi, 2022). Therefore, organizations should promote constructive conflict management approaches to enhance overall effectiveness.
Table 1: Brief Overview of Conflict Management Style
| Conflict Management Style | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Collaborative | Involves open communication and cooperation among group members to find win-win solutions. | Promotes creativity, builds trust and rapport among team members, leads to better long-term relationships and solutions. | Requires time and effort to ensure all viewpoints are considered, may be challenging if parties have deep-rooted differences or lack mutual respect. |
| Compromising | Involves finding a middle ground where each party gives up something to resolve the conflict. | Can lead to timely resolutions, maintains relationships by showing willingness to meet halfway, allows for quick decision-making. | May result in suboptimal solutions, may lead to resentment if one party feels they have made more concessions than the other, may not address underlying issues. |
| Avoiding | Involves ignoring or avoiding conflicts altogether, often used when issues are trivial or temporary. | Can prevent escalation of minor conflicts, preserves harmony in the short term, allows individuals to focus on more pressing tasks. | Can lead to unresolved issues festering and escalating, may hinder innovation and progress if critical issues are avoided, can create tension over time. |
(Sources: (Hunitie, 2016; Maharjan & Shakya, 2022).
Conflict Management Styles within Groups
Collaborating in Group Decision-Making
Collaboration is a conflict resolution style in group decision-making that emphasizes looking for a mutually beneficial solution. High in assertiveness and cooperativeness, this approach aims to satisfy all involved parties’ interests. In groups, collaboration can lead to innovative solutions, improved relationships, and a more bonded team (Hunitie, 2016). Promoting open communication, active listening, and a willingness to understand different viewpoints, this open approach enables group members to tap into their collective creativity and knowledge to address difficult issues that environmental projects or multinational negotiations may pose.
When transparency, compassion, and a peaceful mind seek consensus on things like making decisions, collaboration is a positive asset to groups. Furthermore, the outcomes of this kind of behavior are positive, and it correlates with greater satisfaction among team members (Budiarti et al., 2022). By working together toward common goals and in honorable partnerships that endure, collaboration allows people to find answers that are lasting and feel more fully a part of their creation. To employ collaborative management techniques, you need a supportive team culture that values trust, communication, and mutual objectives. Group leaders foster cooperation by establishing expectations, prompting members to join, and mediating conflicts peaceably. To create an environment where people can develop their strengths and interpersonally resolve their conflicts, leaders should stimulate the team to speak freely from various perspectives (Riasi & Asadzadeh, 2016).
Compromising as a Strategy in Groups
The choice of conflicts that focus on compromise over personal preference for both individuals made it possible to achieve a shared understanding faster, speeding up decision-making processes and preventing potential subsequent conflicts that might have inhibited team productivity. It is considered unavoidable that some concessions must be made to reach a satisfactory conclusion for everyone concerned.
Furthermore, Shang (2023) illustrated that only groups can benefit from the social impact of bargaining which preserves relationships among members. Since it is often grouping leaders who bear the responsibility for coming to a compromise, one must communicate clearly, moderate, guide negotiations so that a result will be mutually agreeable. Holding the cooperating frame of mind proper to solving a problem can help groups solve disagreements easily, keeping relations smooth between people in teamwork.
The Role of Avoiding in Groups
Avoidance in groups plays a significant role where different people show varied emotions at the time of conflict. If groups avoid confronting conflict for a time, space is opened for emotions to quiet down and for the ground rules to be negotiated in the future. This is a role of avoiding group dynamics and preventing conflicts from escalating while maintaining team member relations. Groups can concentrate on keeping a positive working environment by temporarily avoiding conflicts that are not urgent or important. In some instances, fear, lack of time, or negative past experiences may hinder active conflict engagement.
Implementing avoiding conflict as a management strategy is virtually impossible with talent. Moreover, conflict intervention is only possible by striking a subtle balance between immediate concerns and the need for a better climate for conflict resolution. Guiding the team through avoidance periods, group leaders play a crucial role in guaranteeing that conflicts are eventually dealt with fruitfully. Also, by recognizing that avoidance is only transitory and establishing a specific timetable for conflict resolution, leaders can help teams weather conflicts well while keeping the team together.
Impact of Conflict Management Styles on Group Decision-Making
Collaborative conflict management styles have significant implications for group decision-making. Collaboration enhances the quality of debates within the group by promoting open communication, active listening, and a willingness to consider diverse viewpoints. This style fosters the exploration of various options and takes a collective approach to problem-solving. Cooperative styles encourage cooperation and building consensus, which improves the decision-making of groups, making it more informed and inclusive.
With compromising styles, we can resolve conflicts and business issues. All organizations are subjected to the pressure of competition. Compromising styles prompt people to give up and try for a fair deal between extreme positions. Compromising styles have been able to resolve conflicts and achieve mutually acceptable solutions. Potential stalemates in decision-making that result from dogmatism and delay propagation effects. Compromising styles recognize this approach as the importance of juggling different interests. Groups must be flexible and make concessions that lead to a victory for every interested party in these conflicts (Riasi & Asadzadeh, 2016).
Findings/Conclusion
According to this research literature, group decision making can be very much affected by conflicts management styles. If dealing with conflicts in a manner that embodies the principles behind collaboration: being open to discussion and problem solving while weeding out wrong ideas, then group creativity will proliferate, innovation will become common, and consensus-building resolved easily. On the other hand, conflict management styles require competition or avoidance and undermine decision making by making people distrust one another and produce suboptimal results. Knowledge of how different conflict management styles affect group dynamics and decision-making processes enables people to make judicious choices of strategies in groups, which can work out better solutions to problems and improve their overall job performance. The literature is replete with instances of conflict management styles and their implications in group decision-making. It also highlighted the importance of encouraging constructive resolutions between the parties involved, hastening successful outcomes.
References
Behluli, A. & Qerimi, F. (2022). The impact of conflict management styles on organizational performance: a comparative analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 6(4), 758-775. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2022-06-04-07/.
Budiarti, Q., Hariastuti, R., & Sartinah, E. (2022). Development of conflict management style media development based on android to know the style of managing conflict of high school students. Ijorer International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(6), 718-727. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i6.262.
Egerová, D. and Rotenbornová, L. (2021). Towards understanding of workplace conflict: an examination into causes and conflict management strategies. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 16(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.33225/pmc/21.16.07.
Farah, M. & Rashid, M. (2019). Do confli̇ct types determi̇ne confli̇ct management styles?. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v9i1.53.
Friedman, R., Tidd, S., Currall, S., & Tsai, J. (2000). What goes around comes around: the impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022834.
Ho, H. and Yeung, D. (2017). Effects of social identity salience on motivational orientation and conflict strategies in intergenerational conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12435.
Hunitie, M. (2016). A cross-sectional study of the impact of transformational leadership on integrative conflict management. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 47. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n5p47.
Kuhn, T. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? evidence from a longitudinal field study. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 558-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00769.x.
Maharjan, S. & Shakya, J. (2022). Conflict management styles among nurses at a teaching hospital, chitwan. Journal of Chitwan Medical College, 11(4), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.54530/jcmc.582.
Ramayan, S., Bakar, I., Kutty, V., & Rosa, K. (2020). Causes of intercultural conflict and its management styles among students in sunway university. Idealogy Journal of Arts and Social Science, 5(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v5i2.242.
Riasi, A. & Asadzadeh, N. (2016). How coercive and legitimate power relate to different conflict management styles: a case study of birjand high schools. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i1.8946.
Saeed, T., Almas, S., Anis-ul-Haq, M., & Niazi, G. (2014). Leadership styles: relationship with conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 25(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-12-2012-0091.
Shang, C., Zhang, R., & Zhu, X. (2023). An adaptive consensus model in large-scale group decision making with noncooperative and compromising behaviors. Applied Soft Computing, 149, 110944.
Sultana, F., English, D., Simpson, J., Drennan, K., Mullins, R., Brotherton, J., … & Gertig, D. (2016). Home‐based hpv self‐sampling improves participation by never‐screened and under‐screened women: results from a large randomized trial (ipap) in australia. International Journal of Cancer, 139(2), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30031
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
