Introduction Of The Organization
Orpic is one of the largest and most quickly growing industries in the Middle East region. The Orpic refineries are located in Muscat and Suhar. Besides this, polypropylene as well as aromatics production plants are located in Suhar. They provide petroleum products, plastics, chemicals and fuels to Oman and other regions of the world.
Summary Of Problems
One of the positive things about Orpic is its supply chain, which helps it understand the behaviour of its employees and improve working conditions for them. Culture and behaviour play an important role in attaining overall objectives, so the company hires individuals from different universities to give opportunities to talented individuals in the organization. However, Orpic faces certain issues that cause different problems for individuals and groups of individuals associated with the company. Firstly, the company lacks strategies for effective leadership succession planning because of conflict in authority related to the leadership skills of those who will take leadership positions in the future. Moreover, it does not show an interest in developing leaders.
Secondly, there is general interference in human resource management. For instance, the company lacks qualified professionals in certain managerial and technical activities. Thirdly, the organizational structure of the company is very complex compared to those of several international and national organizations. As a result, coordination between different units of the company is not good. Lastly, the employees feel demotivated because there is very limited opportunity for progression within the organization. Due to this, the sense of loyalty among the workers has decreased within the oil industry.
The management of the Orpic oil industry is more seniority-based, conservative and non-market-driven. It lacks the proactive type of leadership style in which leaders are more concerned with achieving their goals. They share their vision with the team members to motivate them to accomplish their objectives (Langton et al., 2013). Moreover, there is a presence of conflicts and resistance among employees and managers, which makes it difficult for employees to communicate their wishes and concerns.
Analysis Of Issue Within The Organization
Organizational Politics
It is defined as manipulative behaviour and self-serving behaviour of people or groups of people to promote their interests without even thinking about others (Johns & Saks, 2011). It is one of the factors that deeply hurt the Orpic oil industry. In an ideal work setting, most leaders try to develop leaders for the future, and it is considered important for the company to attain its goals. However, in the Orpic oil industry, the poor leadership style of managers demotivated the people. Employees do not get enough opportunities to promote their growth and development within the organization. Managers are not thinking about building a coalition with stakeholders. This has led to increased personal conflict within the organization (Jerry, 2008).
Mistreatment of employees has also been reported in certain situations, which raises the question of the ability of leaders in the Orpic oil industry. It is found that employees are not motivated at all. Besides this, the satisfaction level of employees is also not up to the mark due to the low wages provided by the company. However, the company provides excellent opportunities for fresh graduates to become affiliated with it. However, poor progress in the company reduces employees’ loyalty to the company.
Organizational Structure
In several situations, employees who worked in the Orpic industry have reported that they do not find any effective means of communication to carry their demands to upper authority. There are several reasons, but one of the main reasons highlighted by workers is the poor and complex organizational hierarchy. In various situations, it has also been observed that different units within the organization do not have any coordination related to a specific matter, which creates problems for individuals working in that department. As a result, the company has also faced losses, as evidenced by its financial statement (Hersey et al., 2007).
The hyper-centralized administration of the Orpic industry has led to different issues. The labourers couldn’t share their perspectives with respect to working conditions and different issues. The correspondence framework has been observed to be one way to concentrate on training the subordinates. Furthermore, the tyrant culture of the association leaves no extension for advancement, which essentially represses future development (Mohr, 2012). In the dynamic worldwide business condition, it is vital for associations to encourage advancement to guarantee reasonable development. It has several associations which had rebuffed the workers for abusing the standards.
The tyrant structure of Orpic Oil Corporation conveyed a communitarian ethos for maintaining a higher level of dedication. The decrease in the business level is a disturbing element for Orpic, which is the aftereffect of the present culture. The tyrant culture fundamentally influences the inspiration level of the representatives, which contrarily affects the budgetary execution of the association (Huczynski & Buchanan, 2010).
If Orpic does not take action against this type of attitude among its managers, then it will create problems for the company, and negative events will continue to happen in the future. It will affect the growth of its profit. Due to a lack of proper leadership in the company over the last few years, the company has been showing poor retention of its employees, which also affects its stability.
According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory, there are five important needs that include “basic needs, safety needs, social needs, self-esteem and self-actualization.” In the Orpic Corporation, employees are getting good wages, but a lack of motivation is reported among them because they feel that their prestige and status are not recognized in the company. Individuals in their work setting want peace, comfort, affection and support (Huczynski & Buchanan, 2010). If they lack these things in their workplace, it can decrease their motivation and affect their work performance. In the Orpic oil industry, self-esteem and self-actualization are actually missing.
Besides this, employees are not happy with the leaders and managers. They fail to provide a good environment and motivation to employees. Similarly, according to Herzberg’s theory, two factors are responsible for increasing employee motivation, including motivators and hygiene. Hygiene includes those employees who are not satisfied with their jobs, while motivators are those who are satisfied with their jobs and related aspects. In a real work setting, employees want leaders and managers who appreciate their work by acknowledging them.
Assumptions About The Organizational Problems
It has been assumed by evaluating its issues that there is no effective leadership in the organization, which makes the workplace less respectful for the employees working in the Orpic oil industry.
It has also been found that the organization does not have any good communication system. Therefore, workers and employees are less motivated about their jobs. The organization does not have any policies that may promote motivation among employees.
It has also been assumed that the organization is unionized. That’s why it has low retention rates.
Action Plan
As a matter of first importance, the acknowledgement of the change program would positively hoist showdown among the workers, leaders and managers of the company. The sources and the clear effects of this protection were mentioned in the previous dialogues. Protection from the change of the representatives prompts firmness and absence of help, resulting in the postponement of the change procedure and in interior procedures and tasks. The second issue to observe is the distinctions in the inclinations of the administration and initiative styles of directors in the association, which are weighty to fluctuate between departmental societies and practices.
It is important for the higher authorities to take action against this type of behaviour from the managers, which is the main source of demotivation among employees. They need to create an environment in which staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns. Moreover, positive recognition is important for employees as it encourages them to perform well in their jobs (Martin, 2011).
“It is believed that employees who are motivated tend to be more likely to reach their goals. Within a company, there are many factors that lead to having highly motivated employees” (Moorman et al., 2012). It can happen if employees are given the right opportunities to perform their jobs well. Moreover, ample information and a support system are also integral parts of increasing motivation and self-satisfaction among employees. Orpic Corporation provides good learning opportunities to interns, but the company needs to promote motivation among staff and employees. It needs to promote a leadership style that increases motivation among employees and increases their loyalty. Through this strategy, the company can promote cooperation and communication among different units, which will increase its effectiveness.
Using an IT or IS, the organization would have the capacity to sort out its client database, which would enable it to have a viable and effective item stock, subsequent client meet-ups, and assessment of client inputs for item change. Ultimately, the association can enhance its activity techniques through the change of its inventory network. In the administration of its production network, both the providers and the enterprise would have the capacity to have a fruitful and efficient association, in this way keeping the obstacles of arrangements and assets thought about as important by the association (Jerry, 2008).
It is necessary to avoid any buck-passing, irresponsibility, and misunderstanding to promote communication among different units of the company and to overcome the losses that the Orpic oil industry has faced in recent years (Fincham & Rhodes, 2015). It is important for them to analyse the role of each worker and manager and allocate power and resources carefully. In the last few years, in the Orpic oil industry, the allocation of power has not been well-defined and has been less effective. The area of responsibility is not well-defined for managers, which has also created some problems for employees in terms of motivation and encouragement.
Conclusion
One of the positive things about Orpic is its inventory network, which helps it comprehend the conduct of its representatives and enhances working conditions for them. Culture and conduct play a vital part in achieving general goals, so they contract people from various colleges to offer chances to gifted people in their association. However, certain issues have also been identified. Mistreatment of employees has also been reported in certain situations, which raises the question of the ability of leaders in the Orpic oil industry. It is found that employees are not motivated at all. Besides this, the satisfaction level of employees is also not up to the mark due to the low wages provided by the company. However, it provides excellent opportunities for fresh graduates to become affiliated with the company. However, poor progress in the company reduces employees’ loyalty to the company.
In the end, it is necessary for the higher authorities to take action against this type of behaviour from the managers, which is the main source of demotivation among employees. They need to create an environment in which staff feel comfortable sharing their concerns. Moreover, positive recognition is important for employees as it encourages them to perform well in their jobs.
References
Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Organizational behaviour: Understanding and managing life at work.
Fincham, R., & Rhodes, P. (2015). Principles of organizational behaviour. OUP Catalogue.
Langton, N., Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Fundamentals of organizational behaviour. Pearson Education Canada.
Jerry, L. (2008). Organizational behavior: Concepts and applications.
Martin, J. (2011). Organizational behaviour. Cengage Learning Business Press.
Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). A meta‐analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131-149.
Huczynski, A., & Buchanan, D. A. (2010). Organizational behaviour. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2007). Management of organizational behavior (Vol. 9). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mohr, L. B. (2012). Explaining organizational behavior. Jossey-Bass.
Academic Master Education Team is a group of academic editors and subject specialists responsible for producing structured, research-backed essays across multiple disciplines. Each article is developed following Academic Master’s Editorial Policy and supported by credible academic references. The team ensures clarity, citation accuracy, and adherence to ethical academic writing standards
Content reviewed under Academic Master Editorial Policy.
