The attention American Journal of Psychology is focused on empirical scientific reports, however, it also publishes specialized theoretical, methodological and review articles. The articles, as a rule, assume a long introduction and review of the literature, several studies have been conducted that examine different parts of the hypothesis or test a few contending speculations. A few analysts find in the request of a few tests an over the top weight, which defers the distribution of significant work. Notwithstanding, this prerequisite additionally keeps up the feeling that the examination distributed in the diary has been painstakingly checked and is more averse to be the consequence of a slip-up.
The journal includes three separate sections that have their own editor. In the section “Relations and social cognition”, those social behavior questions are considered, in which insight assumes a vital part, including the interface of cognizance with evident conduct, influence and inspiration. The segment “Interpersonal relations and group processes “centers around the mental and auxiliary highlights of collaboration in sets and gatherings. In the segment “Individual Processes and Individual Differences”, look into on all parts of identity brain science is distributed. It incorporates the exploration of individual contrasts and the primary procedures of conduct, feelings, adapting, wellbeing, inspiration and other marvels that mirror the identity. It seems that the American Journal of Psychology is the longest-running one. Even before my eyes I have repeatedly changed the editors-in-chief and the general direction; fortunately, still fury. It is published very frequently. The level of texts is designed for broad masses, after the “Science and Life” at first seemed light, but then I evaluated the combination of satisfactory scientific accuracy with accessibility. The range of questions and topics is broad, from psychology to useful advice on the relationship and upbringing of students. Recently, specialized journals of specific psychologists have added to the journal itself.
Journal of Educational Psychology
According to the recent data, in the national rating of the publication activity of the journals Science Index the first place among the scientific journals of the Scientific Citation Index in the areas of “Psychology” and “Public Education. Journal of Educational Psychology is the only publication on psychology and pedagogy was included Psychological Science and Education. Incidentally because in my region this is a rarity: it is incredibly difficult to subscribe to it, besides it is very expensive. Only occasionally individual specimens cross the regional border in the suitcases of those rare psychologists who, having found themselves in America, found the strength to return from there. Then it’s time again, again, to complain about how far we are from modern scientific trends, how difficult it is for a psychologist to join the last word of world science. However, before uttering these platitudes, let’s, if there is such an opportunity, I take a closer look at one of the latest examples of psychology in American style. What do I lose without access to this mouthpiece of scientific thought? And maybe, I do not lose anything, and it’s time for those who suffer from provincial complexes to get rid of them?
It would be more correct to call the journal “Journal of Educational Psychology”, because not one of the pages mentions any psychologist from any other country, as if they do not exist at all. One has to agree with the opinion of many independent observers that Americans, other than America itself, seem to be not interested in anything. Journal of Educational Psychology is a publication of a completely different kind; it is designed, as they say, to “a wide range of readers,” that is, mostly nonpsychologists. And it exists under the same laws as other similar publications – from “Penthouse” to “Cosmopolitan”, that is, it is extremely interested in increasing the circulation at almost any cost.
International Journal of Psychology
In this International Journal of Psychology the concept of “individual adaptability” and its meaning in the behavior of people in the transitional period of the development of society is clearly defined, in the conditions of cataclysms, accompanied by uncertainty and unpredictability of the development of events is considered. The differences between the concepts of “adaptation”, “adaptability” and “adaptability” are shown, which are essentially important for me to better understand my course. The comparative analysis of theories of individual adaptability is given in this journal and an example of diagnostics of individual adaptability on eight scales is given in certain Journal articles: crisis, creativity, uncertainty, training, interpersonal relations, culture, physical resources, level of stress.
In the International Journal of Psychology data are presented that suggest that adaptability as the ability of an individual to adapt to non-standard operating conditions is manifested in different spheres of existence. This phenomenon finds itself in extreme situations of vital activity, including natural and social cataclysms, in military and organizational psychology. In organizational psychology, individual adaptability with the need is analyzed in the study of career growth of workers, especially with the dynamic nature of professional activity and the environment for its implementation. Cultural adaptability characterizes a person’s ability to successfully carry out intercultural and international contacts. This phenomenon, defined as operational adaptability, occupies an important place in the context of military doctrine in describing the mental status and capabilities of servicemen operating in situations of uncertainty, as well as in positive psychology combined with the notion of “individual adaptation resources”. It is shown that managers at all levels should be able to adapt their behavior to the circumstances in which they work. Cultural adaptability is crucial for successful global leadership. Moreover, cultural adaptability is seen as a subcomponent in the training of military personnel operating in an intercultural context. In the context of positive psychology, it is shown that people with a high level of adaptability are able to accumulate and retain more psychological resources than those who differ in its low level. It is also shown that the content of the term “resource” with respect to adaptability is associated with such a means of behavior management as self-regulation and self-control.