Henrietta Lacks was born in the family of Eliza (1886-1924) and John Randall Pleasant (1881-1969) under the name of Loretta. The circumstances, under which she changed her name to Henrietta, remained unknown (Skloot, 2011). Her mother died during childbirth during the tenth pregnancy, and the father, realizing that he could not support his family, moved to Clover (Virginia), where he sheltered the children in the families of relatives. Henrietta lived in the house of her grandfather Tommy Lacks. April 10, 1941, Henrietta married her cousin David Lacks (1915-2002), who also lived in her grandfather’s house ever since she moved there. Also, the wedding took place after the appearance of the first two children, the eldest of who was born when Henrietta was 14 years old. In late 1941, the couple moved to Maryland. Four months after the birth of the last child, Henrietta began to detect strange discharge in her underwear and on 1951, she admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital. She was diagnosed with cervical cancer, and eight months later, despite surgical intervention and radiotherapy, she died at the age of 31 (Skloot, 2011).
During Henrietta’s stay in the hospital, her attending physician sent the cells of her tumor (biopsy) for analysis to George Gay, the head of the laboratory for tissue cells research at the hospital. It turned out that the cells named for the acronym name Henrietta Lack’s – HeLa Cells, have some unique abilities. They multiplied twice as fast as cells from normal tissues, and they became immortal. Such a cell line has made a commotion in the world of medicine and biology, especially after it turned out that the cells can survive even the mailing mail than Gay was actively engaged in .Henceforth, scientists have the world’s first stable and an even eternal cell line that adequately imitates the essence of the human body.
Now it was possible to carry out experiments and experiments on a cell line, and the cells did not die until the end of the experiment, like other cell lines. The HeLa cells led to the immense development of molecular biology and without them, there would not be many drugs, including polio vaccines. They are exploring cancer, AIDS, exposure to radiation and toxic substances, as well as many other things. Coincidentally, George Gay announced the beginning of a new era in medical research on the same day that Henrietta died. George Gay for a long time remained the only one who knew the origin of the cells but believed that confidentiality issues did not allow him to disclose the patient’s name. Thus, the Lacks family did not know that the Henrietta cells had revolutionized medicine. In 1970, George Gay died (Skloot, 2011).
By this time, a problem arose: many other cell cultures from other types of tissues were contaminated with more aggressive and enduring HeLa cells, which, as it turned out, are capable of moving in the air with dust particles or on insufficiently washed hands. In the hope of solving problems through genotyping, one of the groups of scientists found Henrietta’s relatives and asked them to give them DNA samples to map out the genes. Then the name of the donor became known.
The question arose about compensation for the use of HeLa cells without the consent of the donor, but all requests remained unsatisfied: the respondents are no longer alive. Henrietta Lacks was buried without a tombstone in the family cemetery in Halifax County, Virginia (Skloot, 2011). Its exact place of burial is unknown, although the family believes that she is buried at the feet of her mother’s grave. In 2010, Dr. Roland Patillo placed a tombstone in the form of a book on the grave.
It is important here to examine and discuss medical ethics emerging out of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. This is important because it is about race, class, science and ethics. Moreover we live in a time when medical research relies more and more on biological samples like Henrietta’s cells. A lot of the ethical questions raised by Henrietta’s story still haven’t have any answer today. From perusing and tuning in to study of the book of author Rebecca Skloot, and from the analysis, it has been realized that medical ethics were particularly at the forefront of her thoughts. If someone read the book, the reader will see that she was additionally extremely worried that she is not simply one more exploiter of the Lacks family.
This is important to note that Henrietta Lacks was an African American woman who passed away from a cervical tumor in the 1950s and whose disease cells, taken without her consent, turned a standout amongst the most critical apparatuses of present-day science. People have benefited by Henrietta Lacks. Henrietta’s last request today, as Skloot noted, was to take care of her kids, but all of her kids faced lots of difficulties and challenges while they were growing up. Their eldest daughter Elsie, who had developmental problems, died in the Hospital for the Negro Insane soon after her mother’s death and her other daughter Deborah was sexually abused by her cousin in her early teens and had to get married to escape from abuse and became a teenage mother who later left her husband after he physically abused her.
Her son, Joe, dropped out of school and later stabbed a boy and was sentenced to jail. All her children had medical problems and none of them had medical insurance and money for treatment. One of Lacks’s sons asks Skloot: “If our mother is so important to science, why can’t we get health insurance?” (Skloot, 2011). The question is who ultimately benefit from HeLa-cells, there was a genuine absence of correspondence between the restorative group and the patient and her family. The family should be adjusted, John Hopkins for the trickiness and unpleasant way acquired the examples and especially by the biotech firms that benefitted fiscally.
Ethics are rules of conduct, a method for understanding their conduct toward each other. The code of ethics is a dynamic document that is constantly changing. As the morals and values of society change, the document changes to reflect those morals and values. Ethical principles help us to understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and adequate.
Henrietta Lacks was dealt with unique medical ethics, certain esteems were imperative at that point and tolerant secrecy was seen much contrastingly, which connected distinctively to various gatherings (Skloot, 2011). Innovative comprehension of the harmony between quiet Autonomy and medical Paternalism has moved extensively. Very a few decades ago, it was accepted that the doctor realized what was best for the patient and the patients did take an interest in basic leadership never provided critical data about their condition (De Roubaix, 2011). No patient can have an indistinguishable viewpoint from the doctor (and the other way around). While doctors should not settle choices for their patients, instead they should judge what direction they need and enable them to settle on choices that are beneficial for patients and this need to be done in a perfect world (Scannell, 2010).
In the case of Henrietta Lacks, her Autonomy was damaged, at any rate by present-day definitions. She had no decision making power and she was not provided with proper care because of the financial matter and discrimination. She was not well informed and imparting to her the points of significance of her care that would have been taken at a considerable measure, which would have proven to be beneficial for her (De Roubaix, 2011). The disease cells, HeLa cell culture were not just a result of her treatment, in fact, these cells were examples taken unequivocally (to the doctors) for research, and this needed to be imparted to her. She requird to have been given the choice of declining the technique.
When helping individuals through critical wellbeing choices, doctors should remember their objectives. Express in present-day medical ethics are the objectives of Beneficence and nonmaleficence, that is, helping the patient and making an effort not to hurt them (ANA, 1990). These objectives and that of Autonomy are frequently in strife. In endeavoring to facilitate a patient to recover and keep their transitory, they may suggest specific treatment, for instance, tablets. Although when the patient distinctly comprehends the risk and advantages of the pharmaceutical, they may even now decompose it, and since doctors esteem understanding, Autonomy and they admit this. Doctors, for the most part, acknowledge it despite the fact that they see it as intrusive with Beneficence (ANA 1990). In any case, the guideline of Autonomy may request that doctors enable patients to decide for themselves what they think about accommodating, and regardless of how insane it might appear to doctors, a patient may decompose treatment (ANA, 1990).
Autonomy: In the case of Henrietta Lacks, the doctors without a doubt felt they were acting to help her, and examines felt they were acting to help humankind. Lacks and her family did not feel a similar way (De Roubaix, 2011). The manners by which the doctors and society overall managed Henrietta and the Lacks family neglected their dignity to deliver Justice (ANA, 1990). The individuals who argue this all is anxious would be smart to remember particular self-intrigue. The way that lacks lashed out an unpleasant transitory might have been moderated by treatment that is more ethical. In any case, the despair of her family unquestionably would have. Ethics can similarly get this place somewhat troublesome. Understanding Autonomy, Beneficence, and so on requires attempting to comprehend someone else’s viewpoint (ANA, 1990).
Paying individuals for blood/tissue gifts is a terrible point of reference to set, a great many people are content with the information that they have helped medical look into. Furthermore, let us not overlook that had she declined authorization for her cells to be utilized at that point, research would have been deferred yet somebody else’s cells would have been refined, and we would not have this discussion.
What a great it would be content with is an intriguing suspicion, one that might be valid, however, what is critical in pharmaceutical is not exactly what “the vast majority” need, yet what the individual sitting before you needs. While Mrs. Lacks may have served society’s needs, they were not served in a way that saved her respect and Autonomy (ANA 1990). Not exclusively is a utilitarian contention ethically offensive, it is invalid, as the cells and resulting disclosures did not rely upon mishandling Mrs. Lacks. Henrietta Lacks has served society long after her demise through the automatic gift of her tumor cells. With the distribution of her story, she has included another measurement of administration, one in which paper can lift its discussion of medical ethics.
Doctors took her cells without inquiring.” within fold proceeds with, “Henrietta’s family did not learn of her ‘everlasting status’ until over 20 years after her demise, when researchers examining HeLa started utilizing her significant other and kids in look into without educated assent. What’s more, however the cells had propelled a multimillion-dollar industry that offers human natural materials, her family never observed any of the benefits.” A noteworthy section of the general population harbors a profoundly established doubt of restorative research. They don’t put stock in doctors and researchers to be transparent with them. They expect that the protection of their medicinal records won’t be regarded. They trust that somebody some place is profiting off of medications and organic items that were produced utilizing bits of tissue from individuals now’s identity qualified for a bit of the benefits. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks addresses that suspicion, or more all is the striking confirmation of how the Lackses feel they’ve been dealt with by doctors, analysts, columnists, and organizations.
The book won’t console those effectively suspicious that they are being utilized. Skloot says, “The thing that I hear more than anything [from readers] is, ‘We need to comprehend what’s happening. We would prefer not to feel like somebody is accomplishing something behind our backs.'” People need their individual humankind recognized and regarded. Doctors and researchers and ethicists know this. They likewise realize that making the best decision, which can appear to be so direct to people in general, gets more muddled constantly. While Mrs. Needs may have served society’s needs, they were not served in a way that safeguarded her poise and self-sufficiency. Not exclusively is an utilitarian contention morally unsavory, it’s invalid, as the cells and ensuing disclosures did not rely upon mishandling Mrs. Needs.
Henrietta Lacks has served society long after her demise through the automatic gift of her tumor cells. With the production of her story, she has included another measurement of administration, one in which we can hoist our exchange of medicinal morals.
An involuntary contribution of Henrietta Lacks to medicine is invaluable: the cells left after the end of her death, for more than half a century, have been saved by human destinies. HeLa cells, photographed electron microscope (increase approximately a thousand times). Posthumous feats of living cells in biomedical studies and the development of new types of treatment, the culture of human cells grown in the laboratory is often used. Among the many cell lines, one of the most famous is HeLa cell. Hella Cell imitate the human body in vitro (“in vitro”), which are “eternal” and they can be eternally shared, the research data with their application are accurately reproduced in various laboratories.
Since the death of Henrietta, Lacks cells of her tumor have been continuously used to study the molecular patterns of the development of a wide variety of diseases, as well as AIDS and cancer, for toxic effects of substances and radiation studies, the compilation of a huge genetic number and maps of second scientific problems. Without cells of the HeLa line, the development of the polio vaccine created by Jonas Solck would be unworkable.HeLa has also been used for cloning : preliminary tests on the transplantation of cell nuclei before cloning of the famous Dolly sheep were conducted on HeLa.
Americans still experience more about the fact that the Henrietta’s family has not compensated for the use of HeLa cells without the consent of the donor. Now the family lives in not very good prosperity, and material assistance would be very welcome. However, all the requests rest on a dead wall – there are no defendants in the distant past, and the Medical Academy and other scientific structures do not want to discuss this topic predictably.
Clarke, J. B. (Clarke, 1993). Ethical issues in health education. British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 2(10), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.1922.214.171.1243
De Roubaix, J. A. M. (De Roubaix, 2011). Beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice and respect for patient autonomy – Reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery? Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, 64(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.034
French, J. (French, 2006). Introduction to the principles of bioethics. Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology (Vol. 37). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60115-8
Scannell, K. (Scannell,2010). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. Journal of Legal Medicine, 31(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2010.535438
Skloot, R. (Skloot, 2011). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. Broadway Books.
Tangwa, G. B. (Tangwa, 2009). Ethical principles in health research and review process. Acta Tropica, 112(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.031
American Nurses Association’s Definition of Ethical Principles based on the 1990 Self Determination Act http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/ Resources/Ethics-Definitions.pdf