Consultants have many distinctions among themselves. Some of them spend their time mostly doing their business with the witnesses or making demonstrative displays, while others focus on developing trial strategies effectively.
Examples
Generally, it is the job of psychologists as consultants to conclude which of the available potential jurors will be the fair option in seeking the best result for their client in the case. These psychologists, as consultants, investigate, evaluate, and judge which probable jurors have particular biases or prejudices against their clients. A psychologist ensures that the juror is offering a good psychological edge to their clients. These psychologists, as consultants, are able to evaluate whether a juror is lying or not or is not comfortable in any specific matter involved in the case.
Law Enforcement
As their involvement with the courts and the legal professions is growing, these psychologists are having several common ethical issues in law enforcement agencies. These issues are sometimes found to cross some fields. These fields are associated with a dispute among agency necessities and the quality of the mental vocation, confidentiality, and dualism of the relationship between them and the administration of the agency and the officials getting services (Stolle et al., 1996). To help these psychologists with these issues, the Psychology Association requires them to stick with strict instructions and a code of behaviour with a set of fundamentals that must be followed.
Corrections
In the corrections system, there are different areas and duties that a psychologist must be aware of, like essentially the mental health needs of their provision, but many other jobs as well. It is one of the ethical issues of psychologists in corrections to withstand the load of what community and administrative resources can place on them (Reiser, M, 1973). That’s why the International Association formulates an additional standard for psychology services, just to help them deal with these additional loads and dilemmas that they have to face in everyday roles.
Academic
These psychologists perform different duties like teaching, experimentation, managing other students, and different other associated activities.
Courts
Another issue these psychologists face is that the judge decides if their evidence is allowed or not, or the court needs a solid conclusion in either this or that condition, even where the science is not factual (Pope et al., 1992). To deal with these dilemmas, the law society gave an outline, “Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists”, which gives more accurate guidelines on forensic psychology.
Psychologists have a number of characteristics that affect the egalitarianism structure, encountering law enforcement and the corrections department, while courts are also there.
References
Stolle, D. P., Robbennolt, J. K., & Wiener, R. L. (1996). The perceived fairness of the psychologist trial consultant: An empirical investigation. Law & Psychol. Rev., 20, 139.
Reiser, M. (1973). The police psychologist: A new role. Professional Psychology, 4(2), 119.
Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
