The topic
Many people do not get a chance to experience being an athlete in college. Some are interested in getting the experience while others do not even dream of it. Most of the students who are athletes are respected so much either way due to their hard work and what they offer to the entire university (Karaim, 2014). Campus athletes make the university popular, which makes the college receive more students due to its successful team. Therefore, there is no doubt that all athletes need to deserve something great; all their hard work should be appreciated. They should be paid not just the scholarship money but also through cash for their use.
Controversy
As school athletic projects generate a large number of dollars in income for their schools, advocates for understudy competitors have started pushing for schools to pay their players, while rivals say that remunerating competitors can demolish school sports. Many people, especially parents, think that paying college athletes will discourage them from the usual learning, thus lagging them behind. They argue that less attention should be paid to athletics and more attention to normal studies. They forget that this is the best opportunity for the campus athletes to showcase their talents in competitions both at the national and local levels. Those who reject this point of paying college athletes argue that they commit themselves to the game to a gauge practically identical to the expert level. Paying the competitors could be considered as they play a central point in the notoriety of their schools and additionally support their schools. However, most schools do not have productive athletics groups. Along these lines, paying competitors would turn out to be an exceptionally troublesome undertaking, and this could wreck the school funds (Karaim, 2014). Also, many people talk about how stressful and time-consuming it is, but one cannot realize it until they experience it. It is time-consuming and stressful because it is quite competitive, and there has to be enough practice and participation. Most of the time, it goes to practice throughout the day or even a week. That is why college athletes need to be paid.
The pro side of the controversy
University athletes risk their lives playing these games. They have rushed existences juggling scholastic, training, and competitions. It’s just right that they are given pay for their commitment to their schools. Top players will go ahead and play proficient games later on. By paying college athletes, schools treat them like experts, urging them to proceed with the sort of devotion and steadiness when they progress toward becoming experts. Paying school athletes enables these students to manufacture and establish budgetary literacy (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015). They can also cater to their financial needs because several of them can only depend on this money.
The con side of the controversy
Those who are already competent tend not to play hard because they think they have already made it to the highest level, and therefore, they would not like to harm themselves if the game is not at the national level. Compensating campus athletes could drain their energy and make them less motivated to work hard in classes (Sanderson & Siegfried, 2015). Colleges should treat competitors with an equal lack of interest from some other understudy by squashing loan commitments.
Tentative thesis statement
Universities should encourage the payment of college athletes, as this encourages students to showcase their talents and provides them with a source of income. However, it should also be balanced with other college students who are financially unstable.
References
Karaim, R. (2014). Paying College Athletes. CQ Researcher by CQ Press. CQ Press, 11.
Sanderson, A. R., & Siegfried, J. J. (2015). The case for paying college athletes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 115-38.
