One of the main themes of Vonnegut’s story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ is equality; equality of rights mainly and not of attributes like intelligence, excellence, quality, beauty, and insight. Vonnegut uses his story to explore that equality for all individuals is a respectable objective but to achieve this goal, it’s almost impossible. On the off chance that one adjusts the preparation of God and attempts to modify the creation to be completely equal, at that point the world will go to pieces. A standout among vital topics in “Harrison Bergeron” is that uniformity in any state is just valuable in regions like a contest, faith, and gender, yet not for singular properties like fineness, vision, and class. The significant topic in “Harrison Bergeron” is that balance is for privileges and not for properties like excellence, excellence, and insight. Kurt Vonnegut composes this section to enable us to appreciate that justice is future to recover no man or lady than additional lady or man.
By equality, we, for the most part, imply that all men are equivalent and all ought to be qualified for the character of treatment and salary. According to Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”. BS thesis. 2016’’Men are conceived, and dependably proceed with, free and equivalent regarding their rights.” We hold these facts to act naturally clear that all men are made equivalent”. However, in functional life, this isn’t valid. No two men are comparative in physical constitution, limit, intelligence, beauty, and personality as Vonnegut explained.
Equity does not mean the personality of treatment or the equality of reward. If a bricklayer gets the same reward as a mathematician or a researcher, the reason for society will be crushed. Fairness, along these lines, implies, most importantly the nonattendance of social benefit. In the second place, it means that sufficient open doors are exposed to all. Bergeron” proposes. In the event that we start with the equivalent treatment of male competitors and their weaker female partners, for instance, we may end with the request that monstrous individuals ought to be dealt with as though they are wonderful, et cetera.
Imbalances have occurred in our overall population for a gigantic number of years; from the ruler’s Cantos, the surfs in medieval conditions, to the direction of slaves, to the incongruities of women. Today notwithstanding all we have people who go up against affinity and disparity reliably. The cutting-edge American culture of “Harrison Bergeron” works on socialist standards, supporting riches and influence ought to be appropriated similarly and class pecking orders ought not to exist. Like the blamed communists for the McCarthy period, anybody not complying with society’s acknowledged models—in an inversion of sorts, anybody not sticking to the socialist structure—is searched out and rebuffed. In his story, Vonnegut contends that such standards are absurd. It is unnatural to disperse riches and influence similarly, he proposes, and it is just by actually impairing the best and brightest nationals that the misinformed objective of equivalent conveyance can be achieved. Also, it is unnatural to search out and rebuff the individuals who dismiss social standards. We are not all correspondingly dense, or likewise lofty, or fortified for completing an equal quantity of work, or similarly delightful, and so on. Also, we surely all individualities incredibly as a fragment of our identities. Really, to be sure we organize. I neglect to perceive what this contention, on the off chance that it is meriting such a title, is endeavoring to set up. Since individuals are diverse does not mean they are not equivalent. I don’t review saying all individuals were indistinguishable from each other. No, individuals are not by any means interchangeable with themselves after some time. Correspondence is estimated as far as worth, of important quality. And all individuals have parallel worth and equivalent esteem. No individual is mediocre compared to some other individual, ever.
Our life has become so mobile that we are in a state of severe competition; the greed of people to achieve more, to have more, or to take more is increasing day by day. Their selflessness is lost somewhere on the pathway as parents, and even the teachers compel us to unnecessarily compete with everyone as Vonnegut quotes, According to Vonnegut, Kurt. Harrison Bergeron. Mercury Press, 1962. to “I mean you don’t compete with anybody around here. You just set around’’. Individuals are made equivalent by gadgets that convey them down to the commonality level in the story, which is really beneath normal in insight, quality, and capacity. These gadgets incorporate weights to stunt speed and quality; covers, red elastic comedian noses, or thick glasses to shroud great looks and to make seeing troublesome; and radio transmitters embedded in the ears of insightful individuals, which produce sharp clamors a few times each moment to forestall supported the idea.
Vonnegut states the minute people flinch duplicitous on laws, what do you ponder transpires to civilization? For assured utter destruction is the result for myself. People are unaware of the importance of equality or equity when it comes to showing off their powers they forget about laws and they consider themselves above the law that creates disturbances, and these small disturbances gather to become havoc.
Vonnegut demonstrates the equality concept in this story that if we wipe out the difference in the beauty of different persons despite creating equality we make life boring, and the unique taste of everyone’s beauty is lost like when he gave the example of wiping out beauty differences by the mask-wearing ballerinas he says the faces were incognito, thus no one, sighted an allowed and beautiful gesture or a nice-looking face. This try of equality makes the show lack of interest to the audience, and no one was interested in the dull-looking show.
“Violence as a method for accomplishing racial equity is both unrealistic and shameless. I am not oblivious to the way that viciousness frequently achieves flitting comes about. Countries have every now and again won their freedom in the fight. In any case, disregarding brief triumphs, brutality never brings lasting peace”.
In our society creating a sense of equality is not appreciable and people don’t want equality; we as a society become selfish, and we don’t care about others; we don’t care if others are having equal facilities as we are having or not. For demonstrating this Vonnegut quotes “I don’t care if you’re not equal to me for a while. ”
So, the conclusion is that equality should be one of the major goals of our society, but the reality is equality that is completely implemented is not only impossible but also disrupts the uniqueness of society. God has created every person and awarded him with his special place in society, misplacing someone destroys the beauty of nature. If complete equality were established, there would be no difference between a teacher and a sweeper; they would have ranked equally, and as we know both of them are important for their unique roles, so our society needs both of them to stay in their respective places so that the life goes on in a proper fashion. In the same way, we need equality but up to a certain level that every single human should be able to achieve basic facilities but equality above that level can be hazardous to society.
Works Cited
Hattenhauer, Darry. “Th politics of Kurt Vonnegut’s” Harrison Bergeron”.” .” Studies in Short Fiction 35.4 (1998): 387. Primary source:.
Jansen, E. C. “The human rights discourse in dystopian literature; BS thesis. .” A reading of John Wyndham’s The Chrysalids and Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”. (2016.). . The human rights discourse in dystopian literature; A reading of John Wyndham’s The Chrysalids and Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”. BS thesis. 2016.
Reed, Benjamin. “Teaching Kurt Vonnegut’s” Harrison Bergeron” to the Millennial Generation.” Teaching American Literature 8.1.” Technologies of Instant Amnesia (2015): 44-65.
