Ethical Case Study Analysis
In the contemporary society, things are never the same, and people are promoting women employment to improve on critical aspects of institutions. Employment women are currently not the right thing to do but serve as the bottom line in every space. Most organizations, as well as the one depicted in the case study, currently move past the existing legal compliance and embrace a fair working condition to offer equal opportunity for women. In the case study, Anna is equally competent and should be given a chance to nurture a culture of cooperating and caring within the premise (Roberts 17). Even though most stakeholders focus on the competitive approach in every organization, it is imperative to understand that such is not enough and attention should also focus on how to handle personalities within the organization. That is key to the growth in globalization, which gives rise to different characters within the premise. It is indeed imperative for managers to empower women and make them part of the management in whichever capacity.
Women are still discriminated in most environments, and that makes them face some challenges, which should be addressed to promote equality. According to the case study, Jon had the necessary skills that made it possible for him to compete fairly. However, experience at times might be deceiving and result in the employment of a personality which is not likely to bring unity and foster success within the organization. According to the case, it is apparent that Harry did not attach any sexual demands to the employment opportunity and instead focused on the possibility of getting the best skills to foster success within the organization.
It is ethical right to hire Anna since some features should be part of the organization at any given instance (Held 23). It is not a necessity to consider the skills attributed. In fact, there is need to understand some other core demands that will foster growth in different departments. Being aware of the rights associated to any aspect of the organization is mandatory, and it is critical to enlighten women in various parts of the world on the most effective course of action to be taken at any given instance.
Interpersonal relationships and care is such a crucial instance that organizations need in the modern society to thwart incidences of conflict, which is indeed harmful to the ultimate success of the premise. Harry has the space to bring a personality that will foster unity as well as progress at the expense. Moreover, Anna has the academic qualifications likely to learn about key aspects of the organization. That should be the priority within the venture. Some issues are necessary for an entity to embrace care ethics within every organization (Roberts 17).
First, there is the need for a high degree of dependence as well as a high level of interdependence. In another instance, there is the case in which an individual relates to the consequences of the choice made within his or her space, and that mostly require the best consideration based on the level of vulnerability. Ultimately, there is the aspect of contextual details. Such is also necessary for safeguarding as well as promoting the various interests of parties involved. Employing Anna within the organization is indeed a just course that Harry should implement to softer growth as well a success within the premise.
In conclusion, it is ethical for Harry to employ Anna based on the values that she will impact in the organization. Whichever the action is taken, the focus should be on improving the relationships that exist within the premise. Such is helpful in fostering relationships and making it possible to cultivate a culture that not only considers the profitability of the venture but also make it possible to focus on conflict prevention.
Held, Virginia. The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2006.
Roberts, Laura Weiss, John Battaglia, and Richard S. Epstein. “Frontier ethics: Mental health care needs and ethical dilemmas in rural communities.” Psychiatric services 50.4 (1999): 7-503.