International law, the body of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities.

Has the U.S Constitution Betrayed the Colonist beliefs?

The main idea of the revolution was that a republic was the true and appropriate form of government. Republics did not exist in any of the European countries back then, and thus, this antique form of government was pretty revolutionary as republics didn’t usually last. Let’s go back to the time of the colonist states to gain an understanding of the beliefs that existed before the creation of the United

Read More

the pros and cons of the Death Penalty Law

The death penalty is a law regulated for most criminal acts that are being conducted by criminals. Death penalties set a fright among the other offenders and stop further killings. It saves the lives of innocent people who are threatened. It provides justice for the murders being conducted. The Bible also supports such punishments, as it states, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” It decreases the

Read More

evaluating The effectiveness of the current criminal prosecution system and some suggestions for improving its fairness

The Steps Between Arrest, Pre-Trial, Trial, And Appeals It all starts when an officer arrests someone and the person who is accused is first taken into custody. The same happens when the grand jury is at work and returning with an indictment or the prosecutor is filing information.  Similarly, when the judge issues a warrant for the person’s arrest, the person is then subsequently taken into custody. At times, there

Read More

A Review of the Old American Act 1965

The main aim of the Old American Act was to develop the individuals lives which are older and have problems concerning community service, employment, housing and mental health. It was the first legislature authorized to bring together the private ageing network and fragmented public delivery system to meet the basic requirements of older individuals. This act stipulates that agencies on ageing must be established to supervise these ageing establishments. It

Read More

Annotated Bibliography on Capital Punishment in the Criminal Justice System

Topic: Capital Punishment in the Criminal Justice System Thesis: The criminal justice system should revisit capital punishment as a form of combating crime as there are aspects of biases experienced. Kumar S. “OPINION: The death sentence is ineffective, cruel” OPINION. 3 Feb 2015 The article “OPINION: The death sentence is ineffective, cruel,” authored by Sonia Kumar has various arguments regarding the form of punishment that is applied whenever a crime

Read More

Bail Reform Initiative in the United States

The following paper analyzes the bail reform initiative in the United States and elaborates on other interrelated issues. Bail can be defined as a temporary release of the accused from incarceration on behalf of some real guarantee that may include bonds, cash or any other property. This bailed asset is given to the court, and the granter also assures the appearance of the accused whenever he is required for the

Read More

Questions and Answers on Racism

Q.1: What is racial profiling? Provide examples of how law enforcement, government officials, and/or ordinary citizens used racial profiling labels and harmed others (See the Michael Brown case). Answer:  By the meaning of racial profiling, the targeted persons who are suspected of a crime are dealt with by law enforcement based on their race, religion, ethnicity, or national origins. The criminal profile work is usually associated with the police department.

Read More

Miranda Rights for Suspects to Prevent Incrimination

Any person who has come into contact with the law is completely aware of the common police phrase, which states that everyone has the right to remain silent during interrogation. This phrase and others include access to a lawyer and are widely known as Miranda rights (Graham, 1966, p. 59). The 5th Amendment protects the suspect from incriminating himself. In this case from 1960, Ernesto Miranda was arrested under convictions

Read More

The concept of Unconscionability and why it may mean that a contract is not enforceable. What are the leading cases on this? Why do we have such principles in our commercial world?

Introduction The concept behind the term unconscionably otherwise known as unconscionable conduct or dealings. This term is widely used in Australia and provides a reference to the contract law stating the exclusion of any such terms, policies, or conditions that favor one side over the other or just appear to present an unjust advantage to someone. This is usually when one party gains a superior advantage over the other, in

Read More

Community supervision via probation and parole

The criminal justice system adopted the policy of community supervision in the form of parole and probation as an alternative to mass incarceration. The purpose of granting parole and probation was to allow rehabilitation of the offenders against mass imprisonment. Parole emerged as an alternative to incarnation permitting conditional release to the offenders. All states in the United States implemented a parole system until 1977. The primary incentive for parole

Read More

Contractual Obligation Case Study

In the Contractual Obligation Case Study, According to the Contract Act of 1872 Section 2(b), a contract is a legal agreement between two or more parties that is binding and that is enforceable by law (Rasmusen, 2001). A contract can be verbal or written. While some contracts are required by law to be in writing form, others are not. Written contracts, however, are better than verbal contracts because, in case

Read More

Law of Contract Case Study

Introduction Law of contract Case Study is defined as an agreement between two or more parties to offer a service, provide a product, or commit to an act, and it is enforceable by law. It is an expressed agreement that comprises six elements, which make it a binding and legal document. The law of contract case study states that for an agreement to be upheld by the law, it must

Read More

an outline of the United States’ Riverside County police Department and the process for assessing their performance

Introduction Plaintiff Forrett complained in the course that a police officer applied excessive force while he tried to elude capture, and he was shot. In this trial, Forrett got favor from the court of law, and the court’s decision was granted as a matter of justice. The case describes how the policing system is structured in the United States. The first part of the review provides a brief description of

Read More

The US Police Officers in Front of Law

Laws are meant to protect the citizens from the offenders and criminals by minimizing crime. However, as binding citizens of the US, police officers are as accountable in front of laws as any other citizens. And it was proved by Highway Patrol Trooper Donna Jane Watts. She caught a police officer who was driving at 120mph to an off-duty job and was in his police uniform and driving a police

Read More

Effect of Gun Control Laws in the US

The heated argument on the issue of gun control is an obstructing crisis faced by the United States presently and in the upcoming. Guns are becoming a vibrant asset in the creation of the United States. The founding fathers made the 2nd Amendment recognized as the privilege to bear arms to make sure that the individuals of this nation are innocent and not ever unarmed again. The main groups of

Read More

Toyota Unintended Acceleration Case

Toyota has recalled several of its vehicles because of the unintended acceleration which leads to the demise of innocent persons. Toyota eventually recalled hundreds of thousands of its automobiles due to the ground mat problems, problems with the brake and sticky gas pedals. The case of Toyota was because of the likely problems that occur with the mechanism of the gas pedal that could cause the accelerator to get stuck,

Read More

Courtroom observation Essay

Date Turned In: August 25, 2017 Time of Observation: 3:00-4:00 pm. Court Name: Monroe County Court Name of the case: People v. David Defendant  Name of the Judge: Hon. Gerald Judge Name of District Attorney (Assistant): Pamela Prosecutor Name of the Attorney (Defense): Larry Litigator Charges of the case: Illegal ownership of a weapon in the 2nd degree (two counts) Illegal ownership of a weapon in the 3rd degree (four

Read More

ASIC v Hellicar 2012

Summary The complete workbench of the Principal Court of Australia upturned the NSW Law court of Plea Judgments in Australian Securities v Morley and the Investments Commission of Australia and Australian Securities v Shafron and the Investments Commission taking seven non-managerial employees and the corporation’s general secretary direction of James Hardie Manufactures Ltd, ruptured their responsibilities as managers or high ranked officers of the company in relative to the announcement

Read More

Compare and contrast the QLD Courts in order of hierarchy ensuring that the maximum terms of imprisonment and civil claims amounts are included?

Green and Karneval should be charged with both Civil and Criminal cases. A civil charge should be imposed to Green for the hate speech that he made against Karneval. In this regard, a heavy fine should be imposed for his remarks by the QLD Courts. A criminal charge should be imposed on Karneval for attacking Green and severely injuring him. A maximum term of imprisonment should be imposed on Karneval

Read More
WHY US?

Need Help With Your Paper

We help students with
writing all types of papers
4.5/5

4.86 / Sitejabber

A+ quality . Zero plagiarism • 100% anonymity

Calculate Your Order




Standard price

$310

SAVE ON YOUR FIRST ORDER!

$263.5

New to our essay help service?
Sign up and save