In most setups, a person’s action relies on some psychological factors. An understanding of these factors makes it possible for the device the best alternative to solve the problem, as in the case of Yidan and Dr. Smith. Even though feelings might carry the day in specific instances, there is need to remain truthful to particular encounters and make it possible to solve a problem using the preferred means. Compromising such unethical behaviors contributes to an offense in any setup. Explaining the cause of expression is a crucial aspect. However, much focus should be given to the justification since it might not end well in the institution. The paper seeks to answer some questions that relate to blaming and shaming. Much focus is given to the aspects of attribution that Yidan presented.
Situational attribution arose when Yidan explained that her actions were as a result of the break up that she had with the boyfriend. The instance relates to secondary deviance and should never uphold in most situations. There is a need for moderation and have an understanding of basic needs. Misery can be altered, contrary to what most people believe. In the presented case, Yidan had the option to concentrate on her studies and never pay much attention to the emotional attachments with the boyfriend. Even though it seems hard, there is need to remain mindful at such an instance.
Schema is widely used in the case in different aspects. The use of academic rubric dictates critical aspects of the situation. For instance, Dr. Smith used the rubric to offer grades. Even though examples of stereotype existed during marking, it remains unethical to take part in cheating in any given instance (Rogers, Michelle and Katie 15). The ability to communicate expectations makes it possible to provide quality of work, and that was evident when students submitted their scripts. The stereotype is another schema attributed in the case. Yidan complained of discrimination when giving marks as well as offering punishments to offenders in the case. The existence of such schemata tends to inform on the cause of action in the case study. Moreover, it prepares the individuals for the possible outcome.
Language is a crucial identity maker in the case. Yidan attributed her failure to her origin, which was Chinese. She thought that could have contributed to her failure in some ways. Banking on the background, she thought she would be discriminated, and that can significantly affect her studies. As a result, she used the excuse as a scapegoat. The use of language is more of stereotyping since Yidan thought whites were being favored despite claims of cheating in previous instances.
Certain occurrences might seem usual, and any deviation from such might complicate life in some ways. Sexual behaviors are one of such an instance that can be disastrous in some ways (Patel and Urmi 23). Stigmatization arises in the case of Yidan links sexual encounter as the main reason for her failure. That alone gives other personalities the chance to have a different perspective on her. Stigmatization is never right, and there is need understand situations as they arise.
Apologizing is an aspect that people use in most instances to destigmatize situations as they arise. Yidan banked on the strategy to have the best environment that will make it possible to thrive. Yidan used some strategies to neutralize the situation. Keeping silent is one strategy that Yidan employed to remain to avoid any aspect of aggression. Moreover, her emotions, through tears, indicated that her actions were not intentional. That made it possible for Dr. Smith to listen to the presented case and make a rational decision. Ultimately, Yidan managed to express her views concerning the matter. All the strategies were helpful in neutralizing the case.
Works Cited
Patel, Dhvani, and Urmi Nanda Biswas. “Stereotyping of Effective Male and Female Leaders: A Concomitant of Gendered Workplaces.” Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology 42.1 (2016): 1-53.
Rogers, Paul, Michelle Lowe, and Katie Reddington. “Investigating the victim pseudomaturity effect: How a victim’s chronological age and dress style influences attributions in a depicted case of child sexual assault.” Journal of child sexual abuse 25.1 (2016): 1-19.
