In most setups, a person’s action relies on some psychological factors. An understanding of these factors makes it possible for the device to find the best alternative to solve the problem, as in the case of Yidan and Dr Smith. Even though feelings might carry the day in specific instances, there is a need to remain truthful to particular encounters and make it possible to solve a problem using the preferred means. Compromising such unethical behaviours contributes to an offence in any setup. Explaining the cause of expression is a crucial aspect. However, much focus should be given to the justification since it might not end well in the institution. The paper seeks to answer some questions that relate to blaming and shaming. Much focus is given to the aspects of attribution that Yidan presented.
Situational attribution arose when Yidan explained that her actions were a result of the break-up that she had with her boyfriend. The instance relates to secondary deviance and should never be upheld in most situations. There is a need for moderation and an understanding of basic needs. Misery can be altered, contrary to what most people believe. In the presented case, Yidan had the option to concentrate on her studies and never pay much attention to her emotional attachment to her boyfriend. Even though it seems hard, there is a need to remain mindful in such an instance.
Schema is widely used in different aspects of the case. The use of an academic rubric dictates critical aspects of the situation. For instance, Dr. Smith used the rubric to offer grades. Even though examples of stereotypes existed during marking, it remains unethical to take part in cheating in any given instance (Rogers, Michelle and Katie 15). The ability to communicate expectations makes it possible to provide quality work, and that was evident when students submitted their scripts. The stereotype is another schema attributed to the case. Yidan complained of discrimination when giving mark sands and offering punishments to offenders. The existence of such schemata tends to inform the cause of action in the case study. Moreover, it prepares the individuals for the possible outcome.
Language is a crucial identity maker in this case. Yidan attributed her failure to her Chinese origin. She thought that could have contributed to her failure in some ways. Banking on the background, she thought she would be discriminated, and that can significantly affect her studies. As a result, she used the excuse as a scapegoat. The use of language is more of stereotyping since Yidan thought whites were being favoured despite claims of cheating in previous instances.
Certain occurrences might seem usual, and any deviation from such might complicate life in some ways. Sexual behaviours are one such instance that can be disastrous in some ways (Patel and Urmi 23). Stigmatization arises in the case of Yidan, linking sexual encounters as the main reason for her failure. That alone gives other personalities the chance to have a different perspective on her. Stigmatization is never right, and there is a need to understand situations as they arise.
Apologizing is an aspect that people use in most instances to destigmatize situations as they arise. Yidan banked on the strategy to have the best environment that will make it possible to thrive. Yidan used some strategies to neutralize the situation. Keeping silent is one strategy that Yidan employed to avoid any aspect of aggression. Moreover, her emotions, through tears, indicated that her actions were not intentional. That made it possible for Dr. Smith to listen to the presented case and make a rational decision. Ultimately, Yidan managed to express her views concerning the matter. All the strategies were helpful in neutralizing the case.
Works Cited
Patel, Dhvani, and Urmi Nanda Biswas. “Stereotyping of Effective Male and Female Leaders: A Concomitant of Gendered Workplaces.” Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology 42.1 (2016): 1-53.
Rogers, Paul, Michelle Lowe, and Katie Reddington. “Investigating the victim pseudomaturity effect: How a victim’s chronological age and dress style influences attributions in a depicted case of child sexual assault.” Journal of child sexual abuse 25.1 (2016): 1-19.
