Modern society and modern medicine often have controversial political decisions, and maybe none of them are better than euthanasia. In this article, we want to examine the social and moral situation as both supporters of euthanasia and critics, and to discuss this issue in a variety of ways. The complexity of this question will be valid only if it has pledged arguments against the “quality of life”, “the fundamental value of life.” Moreover, does this article set the goal of finding a living concept? At the same time, your independence, critical and liberal interests will analyze the importance of solving this problem.
Euthanasia is literally constituted as “good death” or “good death”; in short, peaceful and human death. This term was also “good start of death.” However, there are many terms that use or can be closely related to the euthanasia dictionary. Due to the broadness of this topic in this article, it is intended to focus on covering the words or terms and taking into account the ability and value judgments. the patient or euthanasia is a person who is looking for, that is voluntary and euthanasia active, while at the same time a doctor (suicide) support. Passive euthanasia can be seen as an act of competence, and even the difference between the more active school’s attention. However, this term is used, and may be the “terminal selection procedure”. Meanwhile, passive euthanasia is interesting when analyzing the legal protection given by the man whose death rate is attributed and helps passive. The difference of the more active schools and the legal status of the euthanasia in which they are located will be discussed later in this Article.
Voluntary euthanasia can say that an action in which “someone asks or kills requires a lot of suicide.” Active euthanasia is the patient’s death goals and is attached to care at the same time.  Suicide physician, as foreseen, requires the patient to provide the necessary tools to provide his / her poor to the doctor.  It is the basis of all terms that are intentions and authorities. This internal community is at the heart of the euthanasia debate; intention to wound Life on the one hand is considered repulsive regardless of the conditions, and on the other hand, one and the same problem with the person’s ability, decision-making, and the right to it.
By assessing the argument of quality of life, it is important to distinguish between the use of the treatment and the value of human life, which is not worth it. John Keown, “Moral and intellectual press message Legal and intellectual sealing tradition”, published in such a distinction: Keown, while assessing the quality of life even human life, using the funds. [And] if it falls under a certain threshold, it would be worth life. “According to Keown, Lord of the House Bland  and the fact that this newspaper’s position is. Judy, who has had a cancer with a high probability of ultimate replacement, says that mantra is very familiar with the quality of life; “Judy’s decisions are still bigger” for the rest of their lives, euthanasia is “active” in the center of discourse and because of the minds and possibilities of a person. Judy Case, as well as countless others, “before improving to jump”, cure a disease, whose rest of his life appears in the decision of a competent adult. We give us a different attitude to the issue of quality, if the quality of life of the intrinsic value, utility, and the ability to restore the most important features of the issues are important factors.
One of the options to avail of the quality of patients involved in the life argument, to reduce suffering in the termination illness based on compassion and action to solve the pain; so most of the as a can be expressed as hardness. Suspending or prohibiting active school Euthanasia, in particular, when less medical chances can cause unnecessary suffering to the patient’s side. Therefore, the patient “s mercy shows” in a ruthless way out of long and non-consumer suffering output “what you want to have the right to claim. If someone suffers suffering and suffering long, it is difficult to argue that their living standards will not be affected.
Finally, and supporting a more active approach to euthanasia, lawyers should not ignore the role of palliative care. It was argued that, if it was not unnecessary, it could prejudice the medical profession. Euthanasia doctors are active if they start to manage their schools, “the appointment of the medical profession” to destroy the confidence and opportunity necessary to weaken or interfere with a patient’s patient relationship. However, physicians, if you have an active role in helping the death of patients suffering unbearable pain, “professional integrity and medicine made according to the basics and fundamental norms” Although it has been noted, anesthesia Implementation of the active school It is seen alternately and earlier in this article the solicitor implies the implants under “death in quality of life”.