Effective medication for any disease is the foundation of prevention, the progress of a disease as well as treatment. However, only a small number of patients in Alaska adhere to their treatment as prescribed. This has resulted in an expensive health problem not only in Alaska but in the entire United States healthcare system. Since nonadherence to medication is a complex issue with numerous contributing factors, there can never be a single solution. The main objective of this paper is to describe the policy implemented in Alaska in order to improve medication adherence among diabetic patients. Moreover, we shall identify the key characteristics that make the policy more effective and scalable. The information provided in this research paper is intended to inform healthcare providers about the effectiveness of collaborative efforts in ensuring diabetic medication adherence.
Medication is the biggest therapeutic modality in treating diabetes. Just as patients have experience navigating the health care system, so do they have different experiences when taking their medication. The experience is often an individual’s subjective account of taking medication in his or her daily life. The experience starts as soon as the patient begins the prescription. It is usually viewed as a reaction to the signs that a medication holds, the feeling that one has when using a substance to treat diseases. The experiences can either be positive or negative or have adverse implications for whether an individual patient chooses to continue with the medication. Therefore, for proper management of diabetes, it is vital that healthcare practitioners work to understand the meaning of taking medication from the perspective of each patient.
The Burden Of Medication Nonadherence
Nonadherence to medication in Alaska has been a common problem, which has led to a number of public health problems. It has been reported that approximately half of the diabetes medication is not taken as prescribed. Within a year, over 50% of diabetes patients are reported to discontinue their medication. The increase in nonadherence has brought serious consequences to many patients as well as the Alaskan healthcare system.
Nonadherence has been connected to poor treatment outcomes and constant progression of disease symptoms. This has resulted in a deterioration of health by a huge percentage. Non–adherence to diabetes has also been associated with increased hospital admissions. Moreover, the usual non-adherent patients in Alaska often require additional medical check-ups every year, thus resulting in an average increase in the cost of treatment by $ 2,000. A recent study has estimated that the cost of nonadherence to diabetes medication has increased by approximately $ 2 billion every year.
The complex medical frameworks needed in diabetes have made this an ideal condition to examine with regard to medication adherence. A study conducted among veterans in Alaska indicated that improving medication adherence could result in savings of approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million annually. This requires proper healthcare planning and policy design, which might impact the general population. Diabetes was selected as a model for this paper for two major reasons. First, diabetes is a complex condition that needs individual management with a strict focus on adherence to medication in order to accomplish the required glycemic control. Second, intervention analysis is another context of the disease. Diabetes enables the comparison of unique interventions with the common goal of improving patients’ conditions.
Medication adherence can be described as the extent to which patients comply with medical prescriptions. Today, the term “compliance” is not used often since it means that it is only the responsibility of the patient to monitor his or her medical treatment. Some patients might never start medication if they are left alone. Adherence to medication has also included the concept of persistence, considering the willingness to take prescribed medication through the entire duration of drug therapy. The degree of adherence to medication by a patient and a therapist is known as a concordance.
In 54,000 new insulin users in Alaska, adherence to medication for at least three years was associated with a 25% reduction in acute myocardial infarction with an even much better outcome of the patient taking higher doses. A similar study was conducted examining the impact of medication adherence on a cohort of 25,000 Canadian diabetes patients. In another study involving 300,000 patients in the mainland United States, the extent of the reduction in the diabetes mortality rate was directly associated with adherence to insulin medication. Another example of the significance of adherence outcome is the analysis of the CHARM study that examined the impact of adherence to insulin medication in 8000 diabetes patients. Proper adherence was defined as 80 % intake of the prescribed dose. The extent of risk reduction associated with good adherence was remarkably great.
Role Of Nurses
Nurses have a big role in the implementation of the policy. A thorough discussion of the advantages with the patients is considered the foundation of improving drug concordance. Moreover, motivational interviewing might be fundamental in framing an open discussion with the choices of the patient when the policy is considered. This should include the patient’s fears and social pressure. The importance of patient choices enduring policy implementation must be reinforced. Rules for the collaborative framework should be clear. The concept of reminder under the policy of care coordination involved nursing practitioners, the relatives of the patients, and pharmacists. Under the policy, the patient and the healthcare practitioner not only get the necessary information on proper prescription but are also provided with a detailed explanation of the meaning and likelihood of potential impact. The policy was implemented in order to actively discuss various matters every time a patient returns to the caregiver. Several studies conducted after the implementation of the policy pointed out that forgetfulness is a fundamental factor that has contributed to nonadherence to medication. This is one key explanation for the observation that multiple effects of medication adherence are transient. The biggest challenge experienced during the implementation process has been the establishment of continuous strategies.
Telephone counselling as a move to improve care coordination has proven to be useful in a 3-year randomized trial. Four hundred non-adherent patients received more than five drugs for the treatment of diabetes. Regular calls by caregivers and clinical trials on drug adherence through electronic monitoring showed a significant increase in the number of multiple doses, which were directly associated with a dramatic increase in medication adherence. Compliance with dose time also increased with a similar reduction in the high frequency of single doses. Less frequent dosing regimens resulted in better compliance across various therapeutic sessions.
Therefore, it is important to reduce the number of single doses, independent of the content, in order to improve medication adherence among diabetic patients. Ineffective medication might cause a lot of harm by reducing the concordance of effective medications.
Review Of Literature
The first study on insulin adherence in Alaska was published in 1980. Later on, a number of papers were published on this specific topic, with the objective of measuring medication adherence, factors associated with poor adherence and policy recommendations that would improve adherence. However, every effort by the Alaskan government was almost ineffective, and poor adherence continues to be a huge problem among diabetes patients. Currently, nonadherence to diabetes treatment ranges from 40% to 50%, and the rate is even higher in Alaska alone. Such huge rates of nonadherence have resulted in an increased number of diabetes patients who do not accomplish the advantages of prescribed drugs. As a consequence, they often have a deteriorating quality of life, and also the cost of health care increases. As indicated earlier, improvement in medication adherence has a strong influence on health outcomes, as compared to the development of new treatments.
Xxx points out that “non-compliance is a problem in all illnesses. It is independent of the kind of medication and whether the treatment is long-lasting.” Poor adherence is a complex concept. The emphasis should not only be on taking medications but also on timing and termination. XXX adds that “nonadherence is not only associated with individuals behaviors, but also the disease itself, duration of medication and probable adverse effects of the treatment.” Medication adherence is also affected by the relationship between a patient and a caregiver.
According to WHO, the various determinants of nonadherence can be divided into several dimensions: healthcare system, social and economic, therapy, condition and the patient. Another study by xxx was conducted to make a comparison of different reminders of medication for type 2 patients. The first set was supported by coordinated care management, such as daily telephone calls, while the second group received monthly care coordination through telephone calls. Both sets received monthly calls. The control for glycaemia in the first group increased, and the blood levels improved.
Another study conducted in Bartlett Regional Hospital, in which nurses call patients twice every month for three years, demonstrated that drug compliance increased by 10% compared to a group that did not have support. This system is easy to implement, and the study shows that a policy like this can spread throughout the entire United States.
Another study by xxx on telephone-based coordination in Cordova community medical centre examined the benefits of regular phone calls after diagnosis of diabetes In comparison to the typical care by a doctor. The main objective of the research was a 3-month prescription. Xxx showed that patients who received regular reminders improved their compliance with the medication. During the study, a state-wide program that motivated the use of insulin treatment also began. The author believes that such an initiative will help widen the implementation of the policy.
Policy
Reflecting on the ongoing commitment to improving the overall healthcare in Alaska, the coordinated policy highlights the key areas of quality improvement. Some of the recommendations under the policy have been debated in the context of reforms in the healthcare system and might have been incorporated in some of the proposals now being reviewed.
About half of Alaska diabetes patients fail to comply with their prescriptions, which has significantly reduced the quality of care while increasing health expenditures, according to a study by the Alaska Journal of Medicine in 2005. Increased costs due to medical nonadherence might approach $ 32 billion annually, according to results from a study conducted by xxx.
Xxx points out that “Not only is medical nonadherence expensive, but also very risky. Because patients don’t take their prescription for different reasons, such as adverse effects, fear about the medication, problems with dosing, and cost to utilize multiple strategies to improve adherence.” The efforts of the caregivers to identify the key opportunities to minimize the barriers need to be mediated.
More than 50legislators and experts in medication adherence, including clinicians, researchers and employers, met on June 20th, 2017, in Central Peninsula General Hospital. At the conference, RAND Corporation provided their study on diabetes medication adherence, and Lead Johnson provided a practical strategy to improve diabetes medication adherence based on the outcome of the study. Nonadherence to medication is a huge health problem in Alaska, according to Dr. Gerald Walled, the lead author of the review. He further pointed out that “finding formidable solutions to the issue should be part of reform in Alaska.”
Care Coordination:
Strategies focusing on improving care need to consider the fundamental role of medication in disease management and treatment. This includes specified criteria for qualification as a medical centre, including care teams comprising a wide range of healthcare providers involved in patient care. Moreover, it should be active in involving patients and caregivers in creating and implementing the policy.
Care strategies to be used in care coordination, including initial medication of the patients, use of all prescriptions, and use of information from the review to establish and reach the clinical objectives and adopt a medication reconciliation process across different healthcare providers in order to ensure that medication is accurate.
The policy also utilizes the appropriate incentives to support coordination activities and improve medication adherence, which are delivered by various healthcare experts. Coordinated care has long been described in different ways in various studies, and a set of methods or organizational models has been implemented to enhance connectivity and collaboration with healthcare providers at different levels. Among the key factors incorporated in coordinated care is a multidisciplinary system. Reminders, education to healthcare professionals, support for self-management, patient education and finally, case management.
The policy of care coordination aims to increase the quality of care by improving healthcare satisfaction and efficiency for patients with chronic illnesses. Despite the advantages, using the policy has proven to be a challenging process. Due to the complexity of the Alaskan healthcare system, healthcare providers sometimes may have difficulties when coordinating their work and actions in an integrated framework for the patients. However, in order to achieve high-quality care for diabetes patients requires collaboration among healthcare professionals.
The key stakeholders who often sit together to deliberate about medication adherence for patients are the most important ones. Insurers began to show concern about various disease management strategies, as they understood that the strategies minimize dispersal and achieve greater outcomes through affordable costs. Various studies have shown that coordinated care offered by interdisciplinary teams can minimize the menace of worsening conditions or prolonged hospitalization. Moreover, collaboration among healthcare practitioners can be imperative to the achievement of a certain intervention and might impact the overall usefulness of a care strategy.
Successful management of diabetes requires patients to use complex medical frameworks in their daily medication process, make significant changes in their lifestyle, and track progress and challenges, among others. Even with such complex frameworks, managing diabetes is not a “do it yourself” thing. It is a process that requires constant guidance from experts and collaboration between the patient and the healthcare providers. The relationship between healthcare providers and patients lies at the core of patient-centred care. A great relationship fosters regular communication and improves the understanding of the patients regarding their condition and treatment. This allows patients to have a comfortable process and participate in medication adherence as well as the overall health outcome. The relationship between the patients and healthcare providers has shown great adherence and positive outcomes. For instance, a study conducted at Fairbanks Memorial Hospital, including 500 diabetes patients from 7 hospitals in Alaska, found a strong relationship between the patient-provider relationship and medication adherence to medication. Access to healthcare providers was not solely associated with medication adherence, suggesting that the quality of patient-provider exchange and not the amount of time spent is very important.
Alaska Overview
Alaska presents a unique challenge in diabetes medication adherence, most notably because of the huge size of the state, the number of isolated communities, and the size of the area that is medically underserved. Other factors, such as cultural and linguistic variation, have also contributed to these challenges. With an area of 663,268m2, Alaska is approximately a fifth of the entire size of the United States. However, it has the lowest population density. The population of Alaska is approximately 800 625, with the most populated areas being Anchorage and Matanuska–Susistna. Alaska does not have counties like other states. Rather, the state is divided into boroughs, the largest one being the North Slope Borough. The unorganized borough of Alaska covers approximately 78149 square miles. The boroughs are divided into census areas for the purpose of statistical analysis and record-keeping.
Key Legislators
Policy interventions are very important and can be very effective for the community, with a focus on improving public health. Public health policy intervention has a huge impact on system development and social and organizational reforms in order to promote improvement in health care. Alaska State Health Department chronic disease programs are well-positioned to connect with other public health department programs. The programs have primarily focused on various issues such as affordable care, transport and chronic disease control in larger societal-level efforts where necessary.
Policy interventions on medication adherence are important. It is system-based and has a huge impact on the entire population by transforming the context in which diabetes patients take action or make their decisions. They have a huge influence on decisions or creating an environment or structure in which everyone is safer. While the policy intervention focuses on behavioural change at the individual level, the policy has also established the parameters for many individual choices, thus taking more direct actions at the population level. This kind of population-based approach is often less expensive. However, the ultimate effectiveness of the policy intervention depends on numerous factors such as compliance, education, and awareness of the policy, as well as the necessary resources that can support the implementation of the policy.
While most state health departments are used to playing the biggest role in identifying challenges, some programs might involve other important domains during the policy process. Involving legislators in the process of policy implementation helps ensure that public health policies are founded on the best available evidence, reflecting the needs of the audience and are improved as evidence evolves.
Methodology
The APCA executive directors invited 88 participants who represented a range of practices and locations. Forty-six of the entire group had a positive response regarding the policy. Apparently, 35 interviews were completed. The reason is that potential interviewees declined invitations due to the length of the interview, conflicts in scheduling, and some of the participants changed their minds. However, the Alaska PCOE retains the consent to participate.
A review of the information provided by the 35 respondents helped identify a number of themes. The open-ended questions, together with the follow-up questions, provided the required themes in response to medical nonadherence while at the same time focusing on broader topics. Therefore, the findings are presented with general themes rather than specific questions. Legislators together 2 Alaska PCO reviewed and organized all the detailed notes individually and then met to discuss the themes that came out of the interviews. Rural, as used in the research, means areas of Alaska that are outside Anchorage, Wasilla, Juneau, and Fairbanks.
Findings
A majority of the respondents pointed out that care coordination is a fundamental service in healthcare practice and medication adherence among diabetes patients. A review of the study shows that 28 interviewees indicated that care coordination is either being offered by the facilities or it would be very important to the facility. Seven respondents pointed out that care coordination is needed and are very supportive of increasing quality. One respondent provided that “a case manager is very important as they help with all the details of the patient, ensuring that medication is running effectively.” Care coordination is very important in the diabetes management. The value is reinforced in the response from a majority of the respondents. Of the 35 respondents who answered all the questions, it indicates that the common challenge in offering care coordination for diabetes patients is that the payers do not usually reimburse it.
Two key respondents reflected on this matter, indicating that lack of sufficient reimbursement is a huge challenge in offering coordinated care in various facilities. However, in spite of the various issues, a third of the respondents stated that their respective facilities have yet to offer coordinated care. The respondent indicated that care coordinators or case managers only offer support in addressing several issues. They help with facilitating referrals, providing important information, and coordinating with the healthcare team. However, most don’t focus on working with patients towards medication adherence.
