Employees’ safety is an aspect that every organization should embrace to not only improve the working relationship but also consider the health of an individual. Nothing is more precious than life, and it is prudent to take the right measures into consideration to improve it at all costs. OSHA is an Act that strives to improve the relationship between the employer and the employee through a set of regulations intended to address the main issue of concern and create a healthy working environment. Moreover, the body offers the necessary training, information as well as any other form of assistance that plays a key role in enlightening individuals in the workplace. Various job environments may present health and safety hazards, and the Act is considered to offer protection to workers. That arises since the Act sets the respective duties as well as the rights of workers. The various workplace hazards need the best approaches, which certain organizations fail to embrace in improving the quality of life. In other instances, lack of voluntary compliance is the main cause of risk associated with it, and companies must be liable for such to improve the relationship among individuals.
Question 1
According to rules set by OSHA, it is not appropriate to allow participants who are not experienced in a risky venture to explore the place. It is apparent that only Bob was aware of the activities taking place in the mines, and that should not guarantee the involvement of a third party in the site. Moreover, the activity being executed on the site was different from what Kelvin and Kate had to execute while on the premises. Work Network operated from an intentional violation of the worker’s policies. The ability to document the paper was under duress. The organization itself knew the consequences of being part of the mine. It was proper to offer training from being part of the documentary. That should have acted as the best preventive measure to avoid harming the lives of Kelvin and Kate. It is also evident that Conglomerated Mining had a business perspective while addressing the issue and valued its reputation by airing its location on TV shows. That is an aspect that violates the health and safety of individuals according to OSHA rules and regulations (Madigan, Forst & Friedman, 2017). It is not proper to value reputation as well as profitability at the expense of life. As a consequence, the two organizations are deemed to pay handsomely to compensate for the damages caused. Even though Kate failed to comply with the rules and have protective devices on, it is likely to help since the team lacked the necessary skills to navigate through the mines. The organization, in every instance, should be able to provide information, training, and supervision to ensure smooth operations. That never saw the light of the day and contributed to the casualties.
Question 2
The existence of compensation law in every part of the work is key in paying the expenses to those hurt while executing various processes that concern the organization. From an ethical perspective, compensation is helpful since it enables the culprit to recover from the ordeal and become part of the organization once more. It is not a stepping stone but offers the space for growth. The state plays a crucial role in administering the system. That happens with the help of the employer, who must remit contributions to the same. The ability of the state to enact such laws helps in removing the risk that relates to the employer as well as the employee (Wuellner, Adams & Bonauto, 2017). The only thing that employees need to be part of is filing a lawsuit. Employers posit that such workers’ compensation removes the aspect of litigation that also has a tremendous impact on the success of the organization. The employer tends to have a constant contribution no matter the state of the injury. From the business perspective, the most important aspect is signing the deal, which the employees execute initially. It stands that they accepted the terms and conditions and should not obtain any form of compensation. Nevertheless, the state still comes and offers the best spot to accommodate the demands of every corner (Hood, Hardy & Simpson, 2016).
Question 3
The Americans with Disability Act clearly states what a person should be part of within an organization. Kelvin got amputated while executing work-related tasks. That alone is enough to offer him the necessary compensation. Kate and Bob suffered similar problems. The Act makes it clear that such individuals’ rights were violated, and the compensation should be enough. Even though the business perspective might hold that such occurrences happen after signing the agreement, it is not ethically sensible.
Question 4
After going through the case and the study materials, it is imperative to enlighten that safety is paramount in the workplace. It is the responsibility of the organization to offer the necessary insight and training to prevent any occurrence that hurts the employees. In case such occurs, rules are clear that compensation should be proper to cater to the needs of the affected. Any disability that arises in the workplace, as seen in the case of Kelvin, should attract good compensation to improve the quality of life.
References
Hood, J., Hardy Jr, B., & Simpson, L. (2016). Workers’ compensation and employee protection laws in a nutshell. West Academic.
Madigan, D., Forst, L., & Friedman, L. S. (2017). Workers’ compensation filings of temporary workers compared to direct hire workers in Illinois, 2007–2012. American journal of industrial medicine, 60(1), 11-19.
Wuellner, S. E., Adams, D. A., & Bonauto, D. K. (2017). Workers’ compensation claims not reported in the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: Injury and claim characteristics. American journal of industrial medicine, 60(3), 264-275.
