Academic Master


Neurophysiology of Perception about Philosophical Issues

Neurophysiology of perception is the condition where depending on the perception or rather the initial view about something determines our judgment when the situation becomes real. Philosophical issues, according to my understanding, are some philosophical questions that are unproven or are in the process of being proven. A typical example of a philosophical issue is the question of whether God exists. People will have different views about these, but no one can be certain that their thoughts are true. A thought experiment is a theory or principle for thinking through the results or consequences, which, in this case, is a story (Fransen et al., 15). A thought example can, therefore, be explained as the device for performing unintentional intellectual deliberation to speculate its results.

Thought experiments always show the possible outcomes of a principle question. An example of a thought experiment is Galileo’s thought, in which he said that two objects fall at the same speed despite their difference in weight. By this, Galileo meant that all conditions are constant, like the friction of the atmosphere, and two objects fall at the same time. Armstrong confirms this when he visits the moon and lets a hammer and a feather fall, and both reach the ground at the same time. This example of an experiment connects to Plato’s cave in that Plato talks of human beings being in a cave where they can see things in bigger ways. From Galileo’s thought experiment, we see him think much bigger by saying things fall at the same speed despite weight difference when friction is eliminated (Fransen et al., 15). This example connects to Descartes’s demon theory in that the thought looks like a delusion to human beings unless they think outside the box. A common human being cannot believe Aristotle just like Descartes never believed the demon. Descartes’s preposition provides the foundation for his knowledge theory in that it expands one’s thinking capacity and makes him believe that despite the fact that you have been thinking in the same way as another person your whole life, everything is same, including experiences, doesn’t justify you two being different in the future. Justified true belief defines knowledge as a process of approving conditions or statements. It gained approval and, where justifiable, was said to the process of standing out to reveal the truth. It says that to believe something is true, one must have a preposition or, rather, a reason for doing so.

Work Cited

Fransen, Anne MM, et al. “Neurophysiology of Tactile Perception: A Tribute to Steven Hsiao: Distinct α-and β-band rhythms over rat somatosensory cortex with similar properties as in humans.” Journal of Neurophysiology 115.6 (2016): 3030.



Calculate Your Order

Standard price





Pop-up Message