| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
Rahul Pathak, Anish Patel, Hilary Enuh, MD, Oluwaseyi Adekunle, MD, Vasanthy Shrisgantharajah, MD, Keith Diaz, MD https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420154/ |
Moi Lin Ling, Anucha Apisarnthanarak, Namita Jaggi, Glenys Harrington, Keita Morikane, Le Thi Anh Thu, Patricia Ching, Victoria Villanueva, Zhiyong Zong, Jae Sim Jeong, Chun-Ming Lee https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-016-0116-5#Declarations |
Robert B. Dawson and Nancy L. Moureau http://accessscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/ICT-Midlines-Essential-Tool-in-CLABSI-Reduction-Publications.pdf |
Richard J. Powers, David W. Wirtschafter http://www.perinatology.theclinics.com/article/S0095-5108(10)00015-1/fulltext#sec4 |
| Article Title and Year Published | Midline Catheters: An Essential Tool in CLABSI Reduction 2015 |
APSIC guide for the prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI)
2016 |
Midline Catheters: An Essential Tool in CLABSI Reduction 2013 |
Decreasing Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infection in Neonatal Intensive Care 2010 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study | The key question to check for midline vein catheters is fitting in place of central-line vein catheters that reduce the central-line catheters on ventilators. | Contamination avoidance and device specialists from the Asia Pacific expanse to generate the idea for central-line related bloodstream contaminations | Its key objective is to decrease the CLABSI and to check the cost associated with this. | It defines the approaches to decrease CLABSI in the newly born intensive care unit on the basis of certain evidence. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative or Type of Qualitative) | Quantitative design | Qualitative design | Quantitative design | Qualitative design |
| Setting/Sample | Group A and Group B were formed for half a year | The site has been nominated on the basis of infectious or non-infectious problems. | An area that yields the most surprising results for midlines | Two rate-based and two qualitative measures have been supposed |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments | Z Test has been conducted between the two samples | Discussion between the two groups of executives was conducted to check the suggestion in the Asia Pacific region and then sent to the APSIC executive committee to check this evidence. | Introduction to certain tools associated with the CLABSI has been thoroughly discussed. | Methods in this started from hand hygiene to insertion and maintenance of central lines, along with the monitoring of emerging practices that have been adopted. |
| Analysis | X2 Test has been conducted to calculate the catheter days | Analysis has been done on the basis of previous endorsements along with the hunts on the computer with the keywords | It was analyzed that because of the financial issues, the use of central venous access devices is less required than in the previous time | Different strategies have been adopted to reduce CLABSI and prevention in the hospitals discussed |
| Key Findings | There is a substantial decline in the overall number of catheter days in Group A from Group B | In the Asia Pacific region, CLABSI showed a joint density of 4.7 per 1000 catheter days, and advanced countries have a zero percent rate | Evidence revealed that the midline device is becoming a valuable method for the harmless treatment | CLABSI has measured the inevitable episode that results in delays in the methods |
| Recommendations | Decrease the number of inhabiting days when eliminating catheters Escape femoral supplement spots Proper techniques for CVC’s should be adopted |
Improve the statement to share the data Execution of CLABSI addition and conservation bundles |
One of the useful methods to decrease the CLABSI is to only place it in the central line where it offers the procedures for ultrasound | For CLABSI, decreased attention and methodical tactics have been followed, and also address them in the public essentials of modification |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project | It is available online, easily accessible, and at the same time authentic, as well | Articles are easily accessible and available online | Supports the project because it gives the total insight into the project cost through different tools | Categorically explain the different concepts with full precision |
| Criteria | Article 5 | Article 6 | Article 7 | Article 8 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
Jona V. Caparas1, Jian-Ping Hu2 http://3g033q44pk4o4eo9td3bwjsx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/Safe-Administration-of-Vancomycin.pdf |
Naomi P. O’Grady Mary Alexander Lillian A. Burns E. Patchen Dellinger Jeffrey Garland Stephen O. Heard Pamela A. Lipsett Henry Masur Leonard A. Mermel Michele L. Pearson Issam I. Raad Adrienne G. Randolph Mark E. Rupp Sanjay Saint https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/9/1087/319064 |
Gary B Deutsch, MD, Sandeep Anantha Sathyanarayana, MD, Narendra Singh, MD, and Jeffrey Nicastro, MD https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/46529485/j.jss.2013.03.04720160616-4150-11rjr0p.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1520678525&Signature=S9ANYurniJmw2ymrbnSRnWko2E4%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DUltrasound-guided_placement_of_midline_c.pdf |
Morrison, Theresa Ph.D., RN, CNS-BC https://journals.lww.com/cns-journal/pages/contributorindex.aspx?year=2012&issue=11000 |
| Article Title and Year Published | Safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial 2014 |
Summary of Recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections 2011 |
Ultrasound-guided placement of midline catheters in the surgical intensive care unit: a cost-effective Proposal for timely central line removal 2013 |
Qualitative Analysis of Central and Midline Care in the Medical/Surgical Setting 2012 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study | The main aim is to determine if venous vancomycin can be easily checked through the original midline catheter. | The main aim of this research is to give evidence associated with intravascular catheter-related infections. | Central intravenous catheters in the surgical care unit are difficult to use, but they can be enhanced through ultrasound-guided midline catheters. | To study the concept of central-line catheters from the social viewpoint and to improve the concept. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative or Type of Qualitative) | Quantitative design | Qualitative design | Quantitative design | Qualitative design |
| Setting/Sample | A measured, scientific, and randomized trial was conducted | Catheters were used on the basis of the intended purpose | The study of 31 subjects admitted to the surgical intensive care unit was performed | Was completed in 400 to 600 beds municipal hospital in Florida |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments | Different patients get venous vancomycin through a midline catheter or a central catheter device. | Different catheters and sites have been used through various methods | Midline catheters (20m) length were employed under the ultrasound guidance | A phenomenology background was useful for this research |
| Analysis | In this, the difficulties and rate analysis of insertion of the midline catheter and the central catheter have been done. | It was analyzed on the basis of hand hygiene aseptic technique, skin preparation, catheter site dressing regimens, and patient cleansing. | The total cost for the midline catheter was 87$ per catheter without any associated labor cost. | Practices from 45-minute telephone conferences allocated by the nurses to 4 units, through the highest CLABSI occurrence, remained examined. |
| Key Findings | By the insertion, it has been determined that venom vancomycin can be securely managed from the mid-line catheter. | The area of an actual avoidance platform must deduct the CLABSI from all patient-care regions. Though it’s stimulating, plans verified accomplishment; however, constant removal needs constant strength. | The entire practice money was $87 per catheter for the Surgical intensive care unit team. This is equal to $1500 per catheter after being done by an interventional radiologist. 283 central-line days remained eluded with money probably of $13,614 during This study period |
Nurses suggested the organization to minimize the infection rate Administering the proper techniques and CLABSI |
| Recommendations | The study for this was conducted at the local or low scale, so the large-scale study has been recommended. | Teach the healthcare person about intravascular catheter use Considered qualified people for this job |
An ultrasound-guided catheter was a reliable, economical substitute for patients in the SICU. | Half a year after the operation of the proposal, made on the nurses’ existing practices, the ratio of impurities has fallen 64% |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone | There was no conflict of interest of the author in this, so the study is available online | Articles can easily support the Capstone because it can be re-written | This research has been conducted to further elaborate on the cost-effectiveness associated with the surgical care unit | This article is fully based on the results of the on-ground experimentation. It will be recommended.d |
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
