1. Introduction
1.1. Background
Cultural differences have become a major determining factor for business as markets, operational processes, and human resources are becoming global. This study dwells on the Indian cultural practices in an Australian outlook. Being tagged as one of the most diverse countries when it comes to culture, India has an impact on the functions of a business, such as the way communication is performed, decisions are taken, as well as the style and structure of leadership and hierarchy within the workplace (Canestrino et al., 2020). Often, Indian businesses or professionals face major challenges and opportunities while working out of their cultural practices in Australia, a country that also has its own distinct cultural practices.
This study will try to find out how Indian cultural variables such as collectivism, respect for authority, and the building of relationships impact business operations in Australia. It will also examine how such cultural differences are managed within an Australian business, exploring both the potential benefits and challenges. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to good business relationships and efficient working between Indian and Australian parties. It shall add to the growing knowledge base in cross-cultural management studies and provide a strategic perspective on how businesses can overcome cultural differences to achieve synergy in their operations within a multicultural environment.
1.2. Problem Statement
Challenges and complications arising out of the interaction between the Indian cultural practices and Australian business operation processes form the statement of the problem for the present research. Businesses operate across cultural boundaries more frequently with increased globalization, presenting situations wherein different cultural norms and practices have to be accommodated together. Indian culture, being more collective-oriented, hierarchy-based, and relationship-based, almost always seems to contrast with the business approach, being more individualistic, egalitarian, and task-oriented, which is commonly found in Australia (Cherian et al., 2021). Such polarized contrasts give birth to various challenges faced by professionals and businesses operating in Australia, along with their businesses dealing with Indian counterparts. Cultural expectations can clash, thereby leading to misunderstandings, miscommunication, and conflict that might cause reduced efficiency, impairment of business relationships, and also lost opportunities. A better understanding of how the Indian cultural practices impact the business operations in Australia lies at the heart of the matter, the research tries to clarify this (Sarwar et al., 2020). This study should, therefore, focus on finding the precise ways in which these cultural differences manifest themselves in the business context to identify strategies that would help bridge the gap culturally for better collaboration, communication, and mutual understanding of companies both in India and Australia. This will be fundamentally instrumental in promoting cross-cultural business and achieving successful outcomes in a multicultural business environment.
1.3. Aim
This research aims to gather relevant data on the cultural diversity effect on the practices of business after examining “how Indian cultural practices” encourage business operation in relation to Australia.
1.4. Research Objectives
Evaluating the various elements regarding the practices of Indian culture encourages Australian business practices
To analyse the advantages of the practices of Indian culture motivates Australian practices of business
To analyse the challenges regarding Indian cultural practices influencing the business practices of Australia
To identify different strategic approaches to mitigate all the identified issues related to Indian cultural practices impacting Australian business operations
1.5. Research Questions
What are the various elements regarding the practices of Indian culture that encourage Australian business practices?
What are the advantages of the practices of Indian culture that motivate Australian practices of business?
What are the challenges regarding Indian cultural practices influencing the business practices of Australia?
What are different strategic approaches to mitigate all the identified issues related to Indian cultural practices impacting business operation of Australia?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Analyse different factors related to Indian cultural practices that encourage business practices of Australia
Relationship Building: The Indian culture is oriented towards building long-term relationships and trust, which can further collaboration and partnership in Australian businesses. As opined by Ashok et al. (2021), because of this emphasis on connection, businesses can form networks that are stronger and able to adjust.
Respect for Authority and Hierarchy: Indian businesses generally work under a clearly defined hierarchy, with an aide effective leadership and decision making. This cultural regard for authority can often offer a disciplined and methodical manner to undertaking business in Australia.
Adaptability and flexibility: An Indian cultural propensity towards adaptiveness as a response to being in the midst of diverse environments that change very rapidly can provide inspiration for Australian businesses about how much more agile they need to be. Their flexibility is key to responding complex and changing market environments.
As mentioned by Mitra (2024), the cultural diversity aspect of Indian practices encourages inclusiveness and, therefore, enriches the business landscape in Australia by fostering innovation and creativity through diverse perspectives. Indian cultural practices have been fastened on collectivism and teamwork, hence encouraging collaborative efforts that might contribute to the cohesiveness of Australian businesses, especially in team-based projects that improve productivity.
2.2. Evaluate the benefits of the practices of Indian culture motivate Australian business practices
Diversity will create an avenue for innovative solutions, creative problem solving, and an understanding of global markets. Indian collectivism will hence reinforce teamwork and cooperation, making the enterprise in Australia more productive and moral. Emphasis on collective success may hence be transformed into effective project management and community sense inside the workplace. Indian cultural practices possess certain benefits that could inspire and improve the same in Australian business practices, particularly in a multicultural setting. As stated by Stahl & Maznevski (2021), Indian culture nurtures relationships and strengthens a collectivist approach in work. Australian businesses can learn from this that building better partnerships and alliances would yield much better cohesive teamwork and long-term business success. Respect of the Indians towards authority and structures of hierarchy contributes to making the leadership of an Australian enterprise more organized and full of determination. This could be very helpful in those industries that require clear decision-making and strong leadership. According to Fam et al. (2023), the adaptability of Indian culture to different circumstances helps Australian enterprises be more flexible and responsive. The flexibility accorded to businesses enables them to navigate the fluctuations in the market with varying consumer demands for sustained growth and innovation. Inclusivity and diversity that characterize Indian cultural practices enrich the Australian business environment with varying perspectives.
2.3. Analyse challenges regarding Indian cultural practices’ influence business practices of Australia
Barriers to Communication: Indian communication styles are mainly indirect and subtle, which easily get misconstrued in this direct and forthright Australian business atmosphere. This subsequently leads to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of intentions or expectations that may affect business negotiations or collaborations.
Hierarchy versus egalitarianism: Indian businesses have a tendency to show strong hierarchical levels of organization, with decisions often emanating from senior leaders. This is sometimes in contrast to the more egalitarian approach seen in Australia, where values of input across various levels are common (Canestrino et al., 2020).
Over-personalization risk: The relationship-building focus in Indian culture may also spill over into over-personalization in business relationships. This could make others feel uncomfortable or be perceived as unprofessional within an Australian setting, where there is often a more clear-cut separation between personal and professional relationships.
Adaptation and Integration: Whereas in India, this adaptability or flexibility is valued, it produces problems of integration into a more ordered and regulated business world in Australia (Cherian et al., 2021). This flexibility also has to be balanced with consistency and the ways of doing business in Australia.
2.4. Theoretical Approaches
2.4.1. Herzberg Two-factor theory
Examining Indian cultural traits in relation to their contribution towards the business operations in Australia, one may consider Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory as an additional motivating and satisfying factor framework. According to Rai et al. (2021), the workplace contains hygiene factors such as policies and working conditions and directors and motivators such as group satisfaction and individual responsibility of both Indian and Australian nationals. All factors are non-exhaustive; as such, when mastered benefit the formation of the right work environment by mitigating discontent but also help people from different cultural orientations to work. For instance, building relations in India may be a task, but in ICC, it may be, good relationships are a retention strategy. As Thant (2023) states, even in these situations, hygiene factors such as proper documentation and honest practices in making decisions can help avoid such cultural clashes. What has been formulated as an answer to the question is Herzberg’s theory, which makes it easier for businesses to formulate strategies for the construction of a workforce that is motivated and culturally balanced, hence, more productive and effective teamwork would result even in the midst of multiculturalism.
2.4.2. Hofstede Cultural differences
As stated by Adamovic (2023), the application of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory has immense benefits in the understanding of how Indian cultural practices influence business operations in an Australian context. Hofstede’s framework provides a systematic way to analyse the different cultures on dimensions such as individualism versus collectivism as well as uncertainty avoidance and power distance. Precarity of these dimensions by a business is a sure way of anticipating and managing cultural conflicts that might arise, thereby guaranteeing smooth communication and collaboration between Indian and Australian teams. For instance, it would be observed that India is highly power-distance, and hence the Australian businesses may change their leadership styles to one that is hierarchical when dealing with the Indians, for the simple process of decision-making and commanding respect. In the same way, it would be seen that the Indian culture is that of collectivism, and hence, Australian businesses may guide projects that would increase efforts directed toward teambuilding initiatives that best suit the cultural values of the Indians.
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Philosophy
The project will be considering the research philosophy as a positivist philosophy because it will help gather all the data which are truthful and factual. It will also help to follow a relevant and properly described structure for conducting the research work and reach a logical conclusion at the end of the study.
3.2. Approach
Deductive approach is the research approach which will be included in this research topic for creating all the questions for doing the research based on the selected topic through theories that already existing theories. It will help the researcher to understand and differentiate the causal relationship between concepts and variables.
3.3. Design
This study will be applying a descriptive design as one of the factors of research design because it mainly focuses on the situation and challenges related to the topic, after considering and focusing on in-depth analysis. It will also help focus on the different factors like what, when and how instead of focusing on a single element that is why factor.
3.4. Data Collection Method and Instrumentation#
The researcher will be applying the primary research method by conducting a survey as the research instrument on the employees of Australia and Indian business employees. Survey will help to gather all the first and current information as per the topic.
3.5. Data Analysis Method
Quantitative data analysis techniques will be considered for evaluating all collected data through a survey by making charts, tables and diagrams in an Excel sheet.
3.6. Sample and Sampling Technique
A purposive sampling technique for selecting participants by the researcher based on personal experience and judgment. The total number of participants for this research will be 100 sample size in the context of Australia and Indian businesses for doing the survey.
4. Proposed Timeline
| Different Tasks | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9 | Day 10 |
| Finalising Topic | ||||||||||
| Explaining the Aim, the objectives define | ||||||||||
| Rationale of research | ||||||||||
| Performing a Review of the Literature | ||||||||||
| Method Selected | ||||||||||
| Collection of Data | ||||||||||
| Analysis of Data | ||||||||||
| Submission |
Table 1: Proposed Timeline
(Source: Created by the Researcher)
References
Adamovic, M. (2023). Unlocking the cultural mosaic: A comparison of Hofstede and modern cultural value frameworks. Cross-Cultural Business and Management: Perspectives and Practices, NA, 181. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mladen-Adamovic-2/publication/371577443_Unlocking_the_Cultural_Mosaic_A_Comparison_of_Hofstede_and_Modern_Cultural_Value_Frameworks/links/648afc439bc5e4366831bfec/Unlocking-the-Cultural-Mosaic-A-Comparison-of-Hofstede-and-Modern-Cultural-Value-Frameworks.pdf
Ashok, M., Al Badi Al Dhaheri, M. S. M., Madan, R., & Dzandu, M. D. (2021). How to counter organisational inertia to enable knowledge management practices adoption in public sector organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2245-2273. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/95994/1/How%20to%20counter%20organisational%20inertia%20to%20enable%20knowledge%20management%20practices%20adoption%20in%20public%20sector%20organisations%20Jan2021.pdf
Canestrino, R., Ćwiklicki, M., Magliocca, P., & Pawełek, B. (2020). Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research. Journal of Business Research, 110, 132-143. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://e-tarjome.com/storage/panel/fileuploads/2020-01-29/1580296616_E14240-e-tarjome.pdf
Cherian, J., Gaikar, V., Paul, R., & Pech, R. (2021). Corporate culture and its impact on employees’ attitude, performance, productivity, and behavior: An investigative analysis from selected organizations of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 45. https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/7/1/45
Fam, K. S., Liat Cheng, B., Cham, T. H., Tan Chia Yi, M., & Ting, H. (2023). The role of cultural differences in customer retention: evidence from the high-contact service industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(1), 257-288. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10963480211014944
Mitra, S. (2024). Investigating the effect of organisational values on sustainable practices and the moderating role of family influence in Indian SMEs. IIMB Management Review, 36(2), 99-112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389623000289
Rai, R., Thekkekara, J. V., & Kanhare, R. (2021). Herzberg’s two-factor theory: A study on nurses’ motivation. RGUHS Journal of Allied Health Sciences, 1(1). https://journalgrid.com/view/article/rjahs/36
Sarwar, H., Ishaq, M. I., Amin, A., & Ahmed, R. (2020). Ethical leadership, work engagement, employees’ well-being, and performance: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(12), 2008-2026. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Huma-Sarwar-4/publication/342610623_Ethical_leadership_work_engagement_employees%27_well-being_and_performance_a_cross-cultural_comparison/links/628e19c8345118162aa644ec/Ethical-leadership-work-engagement-employees-well-being-and-performance-a-cross-cultural-comparison.pdf
Stahl, G. K., & Maznevski, M. L. (2021). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(1), 4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812115/
Thant, Z. M. (2023). Assessing the determinants of Myanmar government employees’ job satisfaction through Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(1), 27-38. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15396754221137193
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
