Abstract
This paper will discuss the legal issues that are related to violence and assault in the case and their legal liabilities, the risk management concerned with the case and the method to prevent such type of assault and violation. The prevention of the incident includes team management, Law enforcement facilities management and league-wide in-game practice. This Paper also proposes Laws to avoid the specific situation.
Introduction
Assault and violence have been a part of ice hockey games since the beginning of the 19th century. In 1904, only four players got killed in ice hockey games from frequent clashes and violent stick work. Furthermore, recent cases of assault and violence comprise fights, fan-related violence, bodily abuse of administrators, and intentionally hurting adversaries. Assault and Violent activities, for instance, jerking, beating someone from behind and banned stick work, are punished with holdups or even imposed fines. Aggressive, or fisticuffs, is also punished but is deliberated by several hockey fans, mostly in North America, to be fairly discrete from stick vacillation or other acts related to assaults and violent activities. They esteem fighting as an ingrained, satisfactory and vital part of the ice hockey game(Carter & Norman, n.d.).
In the ice hockey game, referees could enforce penalties for any banned actions. In the game, the NHL (National Hockey League), from time to time, imposes penalties and expels or suspends the players. The criminal justice system (CJS) has also been recognized to inspect, take charge and imprison the players. Therefore, ice hockey has to turn out to be further planned, and the assaults and violent components are much more organized. This has been assisted, is not a small portion, by intense upsurges in punitive methods and expertise that are allowed for a higher level of inspection of any unpleasant occasion which happens.
This Paper will discuss the scenario of a hockey game in an ice city. One of the fans of a home team throws a beer to the visiting team’s bench. Firstly, the visiting team ignored the actions of the fans. There was no event security at that time to monitor such an unpleasant behavior. After a few minutes, another home team fan throws a mug of beer to the visiting team players. As this time, one of the visiting team’s assistant coaches turn out to be angrier, he mounted on the divider that splits the team-players from the crowd starts moving up toward the crowd, and tried-out to reach towards the fan who has thrown the beer. The assistant coach reached the fan and, in full swing, started bodily assaulting him. As these happened, other home team supporters also got involved in it and started bodily assaulting the assistant coach. The event security team at last reached, and then the police department and emergency workers reached the place of the incident, and the incident was settled. The supporter, beaten by the assistant coach, was carried to the nearby hospital with major cuts and a flow of blood out of one ear. The assistant coach got a wrecked nose afterward being attacked by several supporters.
This paper will discuss the Laws that should be imposed on the fans and the assistant coach, the risk management related to it, The role of team management and facilities management and propose an appropriate Law to avoid these violent acts.
Discussion
Initial ice hockey, in particular, was famous for its incredible violence and assault-related activities, from the point where two players were murdered in three years in brawls. In these circumstances, the alleged assailants were innocent, but these and other physically violent occasions led to a call for the sports department to clean up its acts or to be banned besides the likes of cock-fighting. The vilest of the assault and violence decreased, predominantly with the arrival of rules and Laws for quasi-legal fisticuffs, however violent and assault based events are unable to stop till now.
Ice hockey player Billy Coutu was the 1st and only player till now who was expelled from the NHL for his whole life for a violent assault in 1927. He assaulted the referee and undertaken the referee earlier to the starting of a bench-clearing fight in a Stanley Cup game in-between the Ottawa Senators and Boston Bruins, speciously on the instructions of the coach of Bruins Head. The League’s 1st president, Calder, disqualified him from the NHL for his whole life, but the ban was lifted after two and a half years. Coutu never played hockey in the NHL again(Weinstein, Smith, & Wiesenthal, 1995).
Another violent incident occurred on December 12, 1933, on this occasion when Eddie Shore hit Toronto Maple Leafs star Ace Bailey from behindhand, which caused Bailey to attack his head to the ice; Bailey did not play hockey after that. In recent times, disagreement and criminal charges also ensued from the assault and violent outbreaks by Marty Morley, Chris Simon, and Todd Peruzzi.
The awareness adjacent to the current specialized hockey environment is that disruptive fan conduct is rising, obliging relatives to stay far away from this gradually uneven environment. Continuing this disgrace is a stable streaming of videos that shows the fan’s aggressiveness at hockey stadiums all over the world. Bad Incidents used to occur inside the stadium, and nobody really always knew the exterior of that venue; however, due to the cell-phones and further new technology, we can see these bad occasions being more exposed; not only that, it could upset the whole stadium, but it can also hurt the sporting league and affect its reputation.
Laws For The Situation
There are several laws that should be implemented for the fans and the assistant coach. There should be laws imposed on the security staff as they should be present there to handle the situation.
The fans have made unethical conduct by throwing the mug of beer to the table of the player. The fans should be charged fines for their misbehavior. Secondly, the assistant coach committed a violent crime to reach the fan and started beating him. The coach should be imprisoned, and heavy fines should be imposed on him with a permanent ban for coaching any hockey or another match. The criminal behavior of the coach has made the situation worse. The National Hockey League should also take action against the coach for his offensive behavior. The security staff is also responsible for the incident. His absence in the situations marks a question of their credibility. The license of the security company should be canceled, and the security company should be imposed with hefty fines for their questionable absence in the situation(Bloom & Smith, 1996).
So, I consider that the three factors are involved in this criminal incident. The 1st factor is the fan, 2nd factor is the role of assistant coach, and the 3rd factor is the role of law enforcement.
The security of the visiting team is compromised in the incident. The fan could attack the player also, but the law enforcement staff controlled the situation. So, this incident revealed the security-related risks that are linked to the visiting team. There should be enough distance between the spectators and the players so that the fans cannot go through anything with the players.
Detailed Responses To The Fan Violence In The Stadiums
The subsequent are some of the specific responses to the fan violence in the hockey stadiums. Several evaluations and research-based studies straightly inspect the difficulty of the fan violence. Several of these studies, yet this report mixed the outcomes concerning the usefulness of assured reactions. It is vital that one should frequently appraise his reaction to evaluate its influence in the specific community. To enable the study of the problem and plan, the reactions are planned based on the three fundamentals of the fan violence triangle.
Stadium
- Making the access fences.
It is essential to stop the audiences from attaining admission to offstage or routine parts, balcony areas to which they are not allowed to go, and the media rooms, and to avoid the arrival of those who don’t have the permits to enter the stadium. Some European nations have made moats around the fields to stop the fans from meddling with the gameplay. More than fifty such types of thrilling measurements are normally redundant or permissible in the U.S. Simple physical (e.g., entrances, barriers) and public (e.g., attendants, safety) fences are frequently enough to stop admission to constrained places. However, one must select the sites and fence types carefully. An unsuitably positioned fence may inspire persons to hike or to be seated on the railings, or individuals might use it as an armament if it is not correctly protected(Bloom & Smith, 1996).
- Tactically engaging sound equipment, stages, and screens.
Those Places where the actions can be evidently seen and perceived logically attract more persons to it. Stadium staff can deliberately place sound systems, stages and big video screens to regulate the get-togethers within the crowd. More than fifty sound systems and video screens could assist in breaking up large crowds. At larger trials, additional screens and bigger stages can discourage persons from pushing them to the main stage over the arena to have a better view.
Posting signs.
For viewers, correctly positioned and observable symbols could help to notify (for example, for exit only), warning signs (for example, side-walk turns out to be slick in extreme weather conditions), instructions (for example, only one mug of beer for each customer), and guidelines (for example, rest-rooms are behind the snack bar). When they are used correctly, these signs could decrease the requirement for the worker and could lessen the clashes that are because of frustration or misperception. Ciphers must be simply clear and big enough that they could be seeable over a big crowd(Faulkner, 1974).
Changing the venues for higher risk-related occasions.
When the risks are higher, it could be helpful to change places or change amongst sites till an occasion or sequence of occasions is accomplished. These methods do not continually stop the violence, as seen in the outcome of the Red Sox victory in the year 2004.
Creating meting-out and holding zones for the viewers who are detained or refuse to leave the locations.
When the police take custody of the violent fans or eliminate them from their positions, it is significant to have an elected and safe place to distinguish them from the other spectators. This can stop them from annoying the other crowd participants while transferring the violent fans.
Reshaping the stadium in such a way that facilitates the violence.
Several stadiums have been modified to insert the defending passageways and balcony areas for the players and representatives. Some have made the family insertions isolated, exposing people from the unruly admirers. One could reflect the operational variations to the hockey stadium if the study discovers that violence could frequently arise in the specific place inside the hockey stadium.
Providing segmented and private balconies.
It was revealed earlier that private seating could decrease the probability of fan-related violence. Private seating could additionally decrease violence if the seatings are segregated into exact places. Breaching the crowds down into minor sets could help to enable crowd regulation. This type of seating plan could also assist in enabling rapid segregation and the elimination of violent audiences and fans, with negligible disturbance to other viewers’ practices (Robinson, 1998).
Conclusion
There must be strict rules and regulations for the fans so that the audience cannot throw anything into the chamber of the player. There should be enough distance between the player’s area and the audience. Alcoholic drinks should also not be allowed on the premises of the stadium. In line with the opinions of numerous investigators in this case, and with the ideas of the legislatures of official and informal fans’ collections throughout the United States, we have seen an ongoing requirement for a stronger participation of the hockey clubs themselves in assisting to redirect and control the seldom troublesome and violent behavior of a minor minority of their admirers. This could best be attained over the augmented formation of native fans’ mediums, over which fans and club Managers could have a much sturdier network of the message. These, associated with the fan training structures that are tracked by the native experts, might prosper in varying the fan’s behavior on the modest assumption that they are less likely to injure the status of a hockey stadium in which they sense they have real participation.
References
Bloom, G. A., & Smith, M. D. (1996). Hockey violence: A test of cultural spillover theory. Sociology of Sports Journal, 13(1), 65–77.
Carter, J., & Norman, M. (n.d.). VIOLENCE IN HOCKEY.
Faulkner, R. R. (1974). Making violence by doing work: Selves, situations, and the world of professional hockey. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1(3), 288–312.
Robinson, L. (1998). Crossing the line: Violence and sexual assault in Canada’s national sport. McClelland & Stewart Limited.
Weinstein, M. D., Smith, M. D., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1995). Masculinity and hockey violence. Sex Roles, 33(11–12), 831–847.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
