In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
The Doctors need to tell James that the decision he has made is unreasonable and damaging to his son. The Doctor is very aware of the fact that James has a complicated illness, and he knows that James would require a kidney transplant in a short period of one year or maybe less. The nephrologists know that if they fail to do that, then James will suffer huge consequences, and it may take his life. Hence, with the expertise, wealth of knowledge and experience in the medical field, nephrologists are required to take more action in order to save the life of Mike’s son. Though God is the only one who heals, what Mike was unsuccessful to realize is the phrase that “God helps one who has helped himself” This phrase suggests that God heals the person who has taken medical intervention. Consequently, the doctors are required to notify their parents of James that they are required to pursue medical support for their child and also have trust and faith in God that he will get healed soon.
The relatives and patients frequently face challenges due to the fact that most of the time, their selections are not grounded on scientific ideas of rationality. However, In the case of physicians, it is a very different case as they are very educated persons and make their decisions based on scientific evidence. The Doctor is capable of using rational-choice-based models in order to explore making decisions. As a result, the doctor, in this case, study, must apply the rational-choice-based model in examining the risky effects that are linked with Mike’s judgment and counsel him in order to change him for the better.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian to think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike, as a Christian, do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honouring the principles of beneficence and no maleficence in James’s care?
The Opinions on illness and health vary and depend on numerous quantities of Christians. Several Christians observe health and sickness as the punishment for sins that they have done in their life, whereas others view it as an inducement from God. Through others’ viewpoints, it is the trial of their trust and faith. In this case study, it is very obvious and clear that Mike is a loyal Christian who has faith that the illness is a trial of his trust and faith. And for the same reason, Mike has chosen spiritual-based healing as opposed to the medical treatment from the hospital. There are many Christians who trust and believe that illness is a disturbance of the physical functions and trust that the physicians are willing to help in the treatment of James.
Christianity has a major role in medicine and curing. Several Christian morals and values go in contradiction to the ethical practices of rejecting medical care to patients in clinics and hospitals. The Autonomy of the patient enlightens the moralities of the patients with respect to their judgments on their medical well-being. The narratives of Christianity have an effect on treatment refusal, organ transplant, and the autonomy of the patient. The doctors should, thus, take this into their consideration. The narratives of Christians notify the patients of the risks that are involved in it. I consider that Christians must be capable of putting their faith and trust in God in addition to receiving the scientific approaches to healing in our culture.
The further pressing matter which Joanne and James are fronting is their belief in spiritual healing and their faith in good health from God. As stated by the Christian viewpoint of healing, the final healing originates from God’s will. The Christians have numerous faiths and beliefs in their excursion of faith, for example, fasting, prayer, anointing of oil, and healing. They have faith and belief that God sanctifies the process of the anointing of oils which contributes to the process of healing. As understood in this case study, Joanne and Mike decide to delay James’s dialysis by putting their belief and faith in God for healing. Observing one of their friend who got Christian healing from a stroke is one of the main reasons why their parents, James, have decided to put their faith and trust in healing from God. The healing has given Joanne and James a new hope that their child would soon recover by putting their trust and faith in God. Though the healing services that are attended by the paternities don’t act instantly to heal their child, and as a substitute, the condition of James turns out to worsen than it was before.
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike in determining appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
According to Hastie & Dawes (2010), there are many aspects that bound an individual’s ability in order to take rational judgments. First, as an alternative to execution of the study of all of the accessible alternatives, the human tendency to appraise an inadequate number of options at the time and this is understood by Mike’s parents when they were relying on God’s healing first and put the medical treatment on the second choice. In place of doing a concurrent analysis of the choices, people would choose sequential exploration, which is, of course, risky. In this process of making sequential-based analysis, the human would choose the option which they observe is going to deliver an acceptable result. In accord with James’s parents, it is the spiritual healing process which gives a reasonable conclusion that this is the reason why they first moved from medical dialysis towards spiritual intervention. Thirdly, the choice-based evaluation is meaningfully prejudiced by the earlier practices. In this circumstance, the spiritual-based healing of the patient who is suffering from the stroke affects their parents, James, to move towards clinical-based treatment in order to get healed spiritually. Fourthly, the relatives and patients frequently notice the evidence appraising clinical practices and outcomes as imperfect and undefined. In this particular case, the parents of James don’t want to depend on clinical treatment to be their first option.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
