Introduction
European Union, the (EU), is a union of 28 member states, mainly situated in Europe. To some, the nature and scope of this massive union or alliance are only a political and an economical initiate, but in reality, the citizens of these nations have some strange, but extremely strong cultural bounding among them since centuries. Few people say that the European Union and its article would fall one by one due to the lack of cooperation between the stakeholders of these nations, and which might well prove to be a reality shortly. But the reality is that this unparalleled and unprecedented integration between the citizens of different nations, with different languages at large, by itself is an evidence of everlasting process of future integrations, may the policies and interests of member states allow its citizen as freely as they have been, or put some formal limitations on further integration among with people.
The phenomenon of European unity is not only an outcome of Lisbon treaty, as in 2009, or because of some economic or trade memorandums, like of treaty of Paris of 1951, and treaty of Rome of 1957, which were purely economic joint ventures between these nations to improve their monetary condition after the scars of 2nd world.
The real basis of the European Union was set by Latin Empire or by the Holy Roman Empire of west even before the historians had begun writing the history of nations and empires. All these 28 member nations which are included in today`s European union were the part of greater Roman Empire.
Background
As we have covered earlier that neither the idea, nor the existence of combined European states is new, but if we talk about the formal process of integration among these nations in 21 century, historians like “Victor Hugo” 1945 who dreamt and promoted the idea of Europe brotherhood. They even argue that even after the fall of Roman Empire back in 476, almost all of previous European nations viewed themselves as an unfortunate part of usurped Latin empire, and many young bodies waged wars of salvation against the invading usurpers (Nugent. 2013).
Though having a long history of union among these nations, the American and French revolution stirred even further new momentous for the proponents of the integration among European states. Though in very different and warlike style, European countries were even held together before under the rule of Napoleon’s Empire (Pollack 2015).
According to few historians, the demise of Napoleon marked the actual beginning of the renaissance of European integration, since Napoleon had his political reasons to curb any official and documented unions or charters of integrations among themselves.
Breakage, and emergence of nationalism
As we see a set of a family which lives together mostly in harmony, carrying a great amount of love, care and respect for each other, since their habits, lifestyles, and natures are similar due to their genetics approximations. Even they with such natural love and loyalties for each other disagree on many occasions and subsequently end up bickering and physical fighting(Versluis et al., 2010)
So always remained the case of Europe. The bloodiest of wars of written human history were fought among these European neighbors. Those people who shared cultures and thoughts became at each other’s neck. As there were progressive citizen federalist movements voicing for combined and harmonious future of Europe, there were few extreme nationalist and fascist thundering from behind the curtains, who wanted their nationalities to regionally dominate. Those who were filled with nationalistic ideas came out victorious, though they were quite a few in numbers, like in Germany. But they somehow took over power at home firstly, and then unleashed their brainwashing and propaganda tools. They were so successful in their efforts of spreading hatred, and raising the temperature of these nations, that they ended up causing two, one after another world wars.
But right after these wars and the penalties and patch-ups between these nations, ideas of re-integration began to flourish as swiftly as ever before (Cini, 2016). The word “United States of Europe “was delivered by Williston Churchill right at the end of 1st world war.
Though these apparently idealistic theories couldn’t thwart the mayhem of 2nd world war, the efforts of these integrationists were evident by the formation of organizations like League of Nations in 1929.
Post world II events which led the bases of modern day European Union
Right after Second World War, a need arose more desperately to bind and combine all the nation of Europe, to avoid flames of fire to reignite in the shape of interwar primarily, and as a joint defense against any invading power secondarily ( Kenealy., et al. 2015)
Subsequently, in 1948, practical steps were initiated in Hague congress. This Hague congress proved to be pivotal for the future of European countries and their integrations process. It was in this congress that College of Europe and European Movement International came into existence, which to this day are serving as a center of European Integration research forum.
The Pact of Rome
Though emotional, cultural and ethnic similarities do play amazing roles in human lives, but in real world of hard and rough realities, the main focus on each living human remains on sustenance, and that is why I, in my opinion, consider the “Pact of Rome” to be the most logical foundation of the present day European Union, and the magnificence it achieved after the signing this free trade economic pact.
Countries like West Germany, France, Netherlands, Italy, and Belgium formed together to develop an economic consortium in 1957, which they called it European Economic Community (EEC) (Sandholtz.1998). In the same period, this group of six nations also signed an atomic energy pact, which was named European Atomic Energy Community. Both of these six-nation cooperation treaties can come into effect in 1958.
The pact of Rome was severely objected in next coming years by France, since it wanted nuclear development to be limited, and précised. So in 1965, another set of an agreement was reached, which elaborated the aims of the nuclear program, and its future objectives.
Enlargement of Nations entering economic Pact of Rome
After the success of combined efforts by the signatories of Rome pact, in 1973, other countries like Denmark, United Kingdom, and Norway also joined the pact. Later in 1981, Greece joined the economic pact, and in 1986, Spain and Portugal joined the club.
One of the most significant developments which spurred out of Rome Pact was the pavement for the “Schengen Agreement” in 1985; this agreement gave the real sense of union and integration to the citizens of the entire European world. The opening of the borders, and vise free traveling for European, within European countries, opened new doors of opportunity in every signal aspect of European life (Wiener.1998).Subsequently, a single European Union`s Flag was designed and used as a trade mark of unity.
Four years later, in 1990, a major event of the fall of Soviet Union occurred, which set Eastern Bloc, the west of Germany free, and allowed a greater a Greater Germany to reunify and strengthen the already massive power of combined nations.
Further disintegration of former the Soviet Union brought countries from Eastern Europe like Malta and Cyprus came into the fold of European Union in 1993.
Treaty of Maastricht & Lisbon
In the 21 century, the phenomenon of European Union was officially established in 1993, when the treaty of Maastricht was formally signed by all nations including Austria and Sweden and Finland. Later in the year 2002, official currency was lounged from banks to replace national currencies in all of its member states. This currency was called “Euro” (Baldwin. 2006), which became second largest currency within a year of its circulation.
In 2013, Croatia became 28th and the last nation to join the European Union, but before it, major structural and regulatory legal laws were, made and enacted for each nation of the union to follow while dealing with other member nation of the union.
Difficulties faced by the Union
As we have been discussing in detail that the European relationship has remained one of the unique of all others ones to be found in the history of unions and alliances. When we were talking about the romantic side of this unparalleled integration of around 28 different nations, we didn’t mean that there are no problems whatsoever.
Infect the journey of European Union had generally been very complicated to manipulate since we are talking about around 4,475,757 km2 (1,728,099 sq mi) of the landscape, over 510 million people from 28 countries with 24 different languages. So as per this baffling number, to believe that there can be such massive institutionalization integration of such diverse ethnicity by itself is an achievement worthy of highest appreciations.
But the problem are there, yet unsettled, and few deteriorating to the extent no return, and others are in the pipeline to get worse, let’s have a look on the major and existential problems faced by the organization called European Union:
The United Kingdom, Brexit, and EU
The United Kingdom, second most powerful and stable economy of European Union, has been on disagreement on many different issues, she considered to be just a liability to its economy (Gros, 1996). Though one of the oldest proponent, and the facilitator of European integration, later found itself to be in the middle of depression ridden nations. Considering itself to be stranded, the house of Common, the United Kingdom`s elected members took a decision and called polling on either to stay in the union or not. Each time the votes have been poll, the thumping majority have voted in the favor leaving the membership of European Union, as per the privilege given to all member states in article 50, and adopting a term”Brexit,” which officially means “Britain to Exit.”
Though some sections of British intelligentsia have been foreboding any such move like of Brexit because they had some calculations about massive economic slump due to it. And it remained true to some extent when British pound went into 15% slump on very next day it voted in favor of Brexit. But it didn’t affect the overall British economy seriously, and the pound recovered its losses against the dollar within few days.
Paris-Berlin Strife
One of the major problem faced by the entire working structure of European Union is the adamant and fractious strife between two of the most leading countries of European Union. The relation between two neighbors and member states of the organization gets so heated that incidents of heads of states
Accusing each other of interfering in internal politics of the other states, and trying to topple governments were recorded European Union`s yearly general meetings. Pictures of German Chancellor “Angela Merkel” were transformed into “Hitler`s” in local newspapers of France due to her austerity policies enforced in Europe (Majone. 2006). Few German diplomats had complained about increasingly anti-German behavior from their counterparts. Though stakes are high, and track record of both the countries tell their prowess of leading and maintaining affairs, but in their inter-relations, they have proved themselves childishly intransigents, blocking with others ways, which is subsequently hampering the process of progress. Though both sides accuse each other of deliberate Obstinacy, few of the current, as well as unsettled historical issues, have remained the bone cause of this behavior by both sides. Few of them should have some elaboration.
Monetary policies
The present disagreements are genuinely about monetary policies, primarily caused by Germany.
The matter of fact is that Germany is gradually finding itself to be in a situation, where Great Britain found itself and finally decided to leave the union as a solution to its impending burdens. So Germany somehow tries to make and enforce such monetary policies, which might help them reduce the pressure on their economy, and allow others to share the burden collectively. While France and other Southern European Union member states don’t let any such moves by Germans, which might cause their economy to suffer from repression. Likewise any proposal France is believed to be self-centered, and rejected abruptly the Germans, even without considering the proposal`s objectives, as was the case of French prosed “European Banking Union.”
Revenge policies between the two Nations
Since France has been one of the most significant colonial power of 20th century, only next to Great Britain, had to this day some liking of jumping in others conflict as peacekeeping. The matter of fact is that France along with five African countries from Sahel region has formed an anti-terrorism force of 5000 soldiers, specialized and dedicated to counter terrorism in Sahel region. So France remains at the heart of all warring activities actively (Borzel, 2000).
Back in 2012, France was preparing a force of peacekeeping for its Mali mission, which by law by was French responsibility, since Mali was a French colony. France, in pursuit of sharing the moral responsibility and garnering troops for peace purposes, submitted a proposal to European Union Headquarters.
The proposal was discarded quite abruptly and unceremonially mainly by the German Chancellor “Angela Markel.” In argument during the discussion on the proposal, German maintained that since this was the sole responsibility of France to look after her former colonies, it wasn’t binding on other members of the organization to spare their men for war. So France, dispelled, dishonored and furious was blocked and consequently had to go out alone for its peacekeeping mission.
Later that same year, came the usual session for “Greek and Italy” monetary Bailout. This time it was France which was ready to strike back as revenge for the callous treatment it had from its co-member states at large, and by its German foe in particular. Since Germany is considered to the most stable and affluent nation among the entire European Union economically, so naturally, responsibility lies primarily on the Germans to help co-members in need of the hour. But France had the other view about the helping fiction. France, while straightly and rather bluntly denying taking any part in granting monetary bailout to these co-members stated: That since it’s the Germans who are exporting their products for business to these courtiers who are looking for bailouts, so it’s not a binding on any other nation to help them buy German productions, but it’s only the Germans, who have to take care of the situation!
Refugee influx crisis
The Arab spring of 2011 marked one of the worst refugee crisis in history mass migration worldwide. It was estimated only in 2015, around one million crossed into Europe, caused an overwhelming crisis for the respective countries to cope with. Mass migration from civil war-ridden countries like Syria, Iraq, Libya, Eritrea, and Afghanistan in fluxed towards Turkish seas to sail into Europe for better future.
Germany stood first and most kind to these helpless migrants, and granted asylum to around 476,000 asylum seekers, mainly from Syria. Hungary was next in line who received, and granted gave asylum to around 177,130 refugees in 2015.
Though very generous on their part in helping stranded and homeless people, concern was raised abruptly because of lack of preparations, funds, and even human resource. Especially countries like Greece, which is already facing acute monetary depression since almost half a decade and which is the gateway for almost 90% of refugees pouring into Europe from Turkish maritime passages, load became unbearable. On the other hand, the majority of European people are afraid to live side by side with these migrants, who are mainly Muslims (Van Houtum. 2007). Even there is discontentment among the general European mindset that there are potential extremist elements among the refugees, who can wreak havoc at any time, once they are given equal rights of living between them.
Turkey, on the other hand, is the main facilitator of refugees traveling from Turkish mainland through its sea, to around the world. Member nations European Union have repeatedly requested turkey to curb or at least, lessen the flow of the migrants, but turkey has repeatedly shown its inability in helping out in the situation. Rather Turkish foreign office is using scenario to its political advantages.
Russian Re-emergence
Along with all the up stated problems, one of the most serious concerns for the European Union and its member states is the re-emergence of Russia as a superpower or regional power on the international stage once again. Russia is finicky about meddling in its neighbor`s affairs. Being neighbor is not the only qualifying standard for Russia to start causing a disturbance in other countries, but the matter of fact is that Russia, under the dynamic leadership of “Vladimir Putin” has changed the approach of making interest out of countries. Russia is not only looking for its interest anymore, but rather it’s looking to dominate once again the region, which engulfs large parts of Balkans and adjacent, which is part of European Union, as part of its satellites, or to form a collision, similar to Warsaw of the cold war era.
Conclusion
As we have discussed in fair detail about the past and present of the European Union, the area to predict or speculate is its future. The future of the organization, its member states and their relationship among themselves.
According to a very high number of political scientists and thinkers, European Union and its institutions are bound to dissolve in utter dysfunction and failure. And one of the reasons for it is their ever-increasing reliance on the United States of America. The United States and E.U are partners in NATO, which has a united fighting force with the name of Security Council United Nation. Now the presence of entire E.U nations in that fighting force is not even symbolic. Instead, almost all of European Union member states rely on united states when the threat resound from the Russian side.
So all of E.U members have to timely plan and invest lot more in its military spending to avoid Russian slow but visibly steady encroachments toward the center of Europe. Secondly as has been the case of the United Kingdom and Brexit, Brussels had no satisfying answers to the logical questions of United Kingdom. Since the example is set by Brexit, and many like Germans and French must have the same questions, there have to be some basic changes in the policy-making of Brussels, changes which might make deals mutually beneficial for all the countries included, rather than the culture of one consecutively giving and other constantly asking.
Mutual benefits would be the interest of nation involved in EU, which would determine the future and existence of union and its future dream of integration in years to come.
References
Buonanno, L. and Nugent, N., 2013. Policies and policy processes of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollack, M.A., 2015. Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, USA.
Versluis, E., Van Keulen, M. and Stephenson, P., 2010. Analyzing the European Union policy process. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cini, M., 2016. European Union politics. Oxford University Press.
Kenealy, D., Peterson, J., and Corbett, R. eds., 2015. The European Union: how does it work?. Oxford University Press, USA.
Sandholtz, W. and Sweet, A.S. eds., 1998. European integration and supranational governance. OUP Oxford.
Wiener, A., 1998. ‘European citizenship practice: building institutions of a non-state. Westview Press.
Baldwin, R.E., Wyplosz, C., and Wyplosz, C., 2006. The economics of European integration (Vol. 2). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
Gros, D. and Thygesen, N., 1998. European Monetary Integration: from the EMS to EMU. Longman.
Majone, G., 1999. The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), pp.1-24.
Borzel, T.A., 2000. Why there is no’southern problem’. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. Journal of European public policy, 7(1), pp.141-162.
Van Houtum, H., and Pijpers, R., 2007. The European Union as a Gated Community: The Two‐faced Border and Immigration Regime of the EU. Antipode, 39(2), pp.291-309.
