Ethics And Social Responsibility

Ethics and social responsibilities are the essential components in the establishment and development of strategic plans in an organization. The code of ethics for strategic planning defines the set of ethical rules that every stakeholder is obliged to follow to ensure the implementation of legal practices while the implementation of social responsibilities fortifies those practices beyond needs. Companies with a robust code of ethics boast excellent reputations in the industry. Contrarily, firms with impractical social and ethical charters not only lose their stature but, in case of extreme violations, face a permanent termination of the license, too.

In a recent incident of a grave breach of ethical boundaries, one of the biggest social networks “Facebook” was found involved in a violation of civil laws for user privacy, as the users’ data were sold to Cambridge Analytica without the consent of the users. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution does not allow anyone to misuse an individual’s personal data for personal usage, as it comes under data theft and privacy violation. The amendment maintains that the individual’s personal information must be kept protected from all kinds of public scrutiny unless adequate evidence is available to justify surveillance, and no one must be allowed to get access to it as long as the subject allows others to view or use it (Bernal, 2014). It is the responsibility of the business firms, before the government and the law enforcement authorities, to protect the privacy and liberty rights of all stakeholders, look after all such violations, and secure the data of the people. State and federal privacy efforts must be enhanced to address any issues related to data theft or privacy violations.

The use of data by Cambridge Analytica is exceptionally unlawful since it not only violated the privacy of users, but it managed to use it to manipulate voters too, and hence, national security is put at risk with such a malign intent. Thus, to satisfy a few stakeholders, other stakeholders are overlooked. The use of a person’s attributes to research personal traits is not wrong and can be used to promote research behaviors. However, using data to shape people’s opinions by sharing information with them that may change one’s viewpoint is immensely unethical (Cate & Litan, 2002).

The breach of privacies, whether online or not, should be dealt with with an iron fist. An independent body, similar to the International Court of Justice, should be formulated that looks after the implementation of the code of ethics and social responsibility of every organization to prevent violations of stakeholder agendas. The department or the firm involved should be penalized with a considerable penalty, and in extreme situations, the subject should be barred too from operation as long as a viable amendment is made. The victims should be compensated with an appropriate amount of money, and the sold data should be destroyed at the purchasers’ end under the surveillance of independent bodies. Moreover, it should be left to the victims to decide through a referendum whether or not the violators should be allowed to continue. Privacy campaigns in recent times have taken the world by storm, and people’s concerns should be settled precisely and effectively.

Corporate social responsibilities and business ethics have become one of the chief concerns for stakeholders and the general public. The companies should move ahead of only cosmetic improvements and should ensure extensive implementation of ethical codes and CSR, even at the cost of short-term gains (Lindgreen and Swaen, 2010). By gaining an excellent reputation in the industry and market, companies can expand their consumer base significantly in the long run.

References

Cate, F. H., & Litan, R. (2002). Constitutional issues in information privacy. Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev., 9, 35.

Bernal, P. (2014). Internet privacy rights: rights to protect autonomy (No. 24). Cambridge University Press.

Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1-7.