Academic Master


Duty Ethics on Torturing Terrorists


The physical or mental harm given to any human being can be referred to as torture. The studies that have always included torture, enemy, and ethics stay under the controversial talk. The torture of terrorists, which is being selected to undergo during this paper, 9/11, should also be part of the main issues that had brought the practice of torturing the captured terrorists in the name of the war on terror. There are different ways that are being used while getting out the information from the captured people, and all the ways come under torture. Every human being holds a moral and ethical obligation towards another human being regardless of the conduct being done by that person. The claim of human rights for considering torture highly unethical contradicts the practice of law enforcement agencies. The security of people and the torturing of others to stop terrorist attacks comes under the moral dilemma (Pojman & Fieser, 2017). Furthermore, the discussion will consider all the aspects of moral and ethical concern by analyzing the policy of torture of terrorists.


The idea of a free society, which is under practice in America, holds morality and ethics in high regard by emphasizing it. In the meantime, the torturing that is being done on the terrorists should be considered the influence on the ethical and moral values that Americans hold in high regard. The law of internationally recognized standards have confirmed that torturing, to some extent, is illegal, but it is being ignored by law enforcement agencies in America (Vaughn, 2015). The emphasis of the international human rights wing is on prosecuting the terrorists in accordance with the law commonly practiced in the country rather than torturing those people inside the hidden stations, which are also being criticized globally. During the time of war, morality was the thing that came under question. Ethics and morality have always been damaged during wartime because thousands of people were killed during that war. The other aspect of war after the 9/11 incident is that Americans, not just on their own soil but around the world where they are fighting the war on terror, established stations for torturing the captured prisoners (Alison & Alison, 2017).

It is not an essay task to take morality under consideration when torturing comes into place. Those who speak of the right to torture provide valid reasons. In order to keep the peace and avoid incidents which will not only bring down the peace but also thousands of innocent people will lose their lives. Terrorism is considered to be a disease that is affecting the peace of the whole world. The innocent people who have lost their lives not just in America but also in those nations who were currently facing the same issue of terrorism have been suffering since. The war is being undertaken in those areas, and the terrorist groups are creating instability (Conrad et al., 2016).

Several of the moral theories that discuss morality and its meaning sometimes defend torture and sometimes go against it. Utilitarianism theory states that if the outcome that is being needed requires any action, no matter to any extent, then that action is justifiable. That means the gain from the torture is bringing peace and ending terrorism, and then the torture is defendable. The other theory of morality is the Categorical Imperative, which suggests that one never acts irrationally, which affects another human being. Terrorists are mostly people who are angry by the consequences of war, and these aspects should be considered (Broad, 2014).


In conclusion, regardless of any reason, torture of any human being is unethical and against the law of morality. Justifying the torture should never be done in any case. The terrorism and the terrorist who are spreading it are in need of help because of their conditions, both economic and mental. There is not a single problem in this world that can’t be solved by talking.


Vaughn, L. (2015). Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton & Company.

Pojman, L. P., & Fieser, J. (2017). Cengage Advantage Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. Nelson Education.

Alison, L., & Alison, E. (2017). Revenge versus rapport: Interrogation, terrorism, and torture. American Psychologist72(3), 266.

Conrad, C. R., Conrad, J., Walsh, J. I., & Piazza, J. A. (2016). Who tortures the terrorists? Transnational terrorism and military torture. Foreign Policy Analysis13(4), 761-786.

Broad, C. D. (2014). Five types of ethical theory (Vol. 2). Routledge.



Calculate Your Order

Standard price





Pop-up Message