Cyber security law greatly affects federal agencies. Government organizations officially under the firearm to modernize their data innovation capacities have another arrangement of principles to meet because of an official order President issued earlier The upcoming order related to cyber security not exclusively will influence organization supervisors in their IT tasks and procurement exercises, yet additionally will significantly affect IT, sellers. There could be an increase in responsibilities for cyber protection at different levels of the agency’s organizational structure. Due to the cyber security law, heads and the executive department are made accountable for managing cyber security risks to their organizations. Organizations or federal agencies are required to comply with NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology ) or any earlier document to cope with the agency’s cyber security risks. The agency’s reporting may increase. The agency’s report might include cyber security mitigation and acceptance choices.
Bill support Sen. Stamp Warner (D-Va.) presented the Internet of Things (IoT) Cyber Security Improvement Act of 2017 to the Senate on August 1, 2017. The bill’s expressed design is “To give insignificant cyber security operational principles to Internet-associated gadgets bought by Federal offices. The bill characterizes IoT expansively to incorporate any gadget that is associated with and utilizes the web. Further, the bill’s reality sheet ponders there being more than 20 billion IoT gadgets by 2020. Along these lines, the extent of this proposed charge goes past center-associated gadgets, for example, cell phones and PCs, to involve makers, merchants, and affiliates in all segments whose items are at last gained by the national government (by and large, “government temporary workers”). The bill is pending as it is criticized for its equivocalness, particularly in accordance with the meaning of IoT gadgets and the extent of the exploration exclusion. The bill characterizes “Web associated gadget” as any physical protest “fit for interfacing with and . . . in standard associated with the Internet” that “can gather, send, or get information.” This definition is possibly clearing in its broadness, and accordingly, commentators contend that Congress ought to give a more positive explanation of its plan as to which gadgets will and won’t be secured.
This is the era of IoT, and many innovations are being done in this field like an autonomous vehicles. There should be proper laws related to IoT. Otherwise, there will be an increase in cyber crimes. The pending legislation can be improved by adding a detailed explanation about IoT, its future, and its impact on social lives. There should be proper media coverage of the pending legislation related to IoT. Especially media can pressurized government to pass the law regarding the IoT.
