Assessing medication adherence among adult psychiatric patients in an outpatient setting

Introduction

According to the World Healthcare Organization, the term medical adherence can be defined as the extent of the coherence between a person’s behavior and the professional’s proposed medicine recommendation (WHO, 2003). Failure to medical adherence is referred to as medical nonadherence, and it can be fatal for the psychiatric patient and the overall healthcare system. The failure of medical adherence is significantly high in outpatient settings owing to the lack of surveillance. Also, medical nonadherence is remarkably high in old age psychiatric patients due to various baseline reasons; the literature shows that failure of medication adherence in psychiatric patients can lead to the severity of the condition and also lead to an increased hospitalization cost (Semahegn, A., 2020). This essay focuses on analyzing medication adherence among adult psychiatric patients in an outpatient setting from the viewpoint of various nursing paradigms and theories.

Patient adherence to the medication is one of the critical factors in determining the progress of the medication. The more the patient adheres to the medicine, the swifter will be the remission of the illness. Medication adherence has been raised as a serious concern for all psychiatrists, as nonadherence to the psychiatric patient’s medication can have chronic outcomes. The extent of the medication adherence to the patients affects the whole targeted population affecting all age groups from children to elderly patients. The problem also has an association with the outpatient setting.

Metaparadigm:

The concept of the Meta paradigm implies the set of globally acknowledged concepts about a particular field. The metaparadigm concept is also concerned with establishing the relationship between these concepts (Chaffee & McNeil, 2007). Like any other field, the concept of the metaparadigm also implies the nursing profession, which it helps in determining nursing as a standalone profession. In this regard, in 1978, Fawcett presented a four paradigm nursing concept; the paradigms were

• Human Beings
• The Environment
• The Nursing staff, and
• The Health (Lee & Fawcett, 2013).

Briefly stating Fawcett’s concept: the first paradigm, namely the humans, are the individuals who are receiving medical treatment. The human concept is broad in that any patient is under the surveillance of either hospital, nurses, or family. The environment can be taken from narrower and broader perspectives: the overall society or the immediate surroundings. While health is one of the natural processes of dying and living, in the end, the nursing profession encompasses taking care of all health processes in the monitored environment (Chaffee & McNeil, 2007). The idea of the imposition of medical practices relies on all four factors. Additionally, the success of the treatment or the elevation of the disease’s remission is also dependent on all the Meta paradigms of nursing. There is a need to inculcate all these paradigms in all the nursing theories, explicitly explaining the four paradigms’ inculcation while describing or devising these nursing theories can make its application easier.

All these four units can be regarded as the key stakeholders, and the theory’s imposition is upon all. So if any new theory encompasses all the paradigms’ roles and responsibilities, it can help in the easy application as everyone knows their expected responsibilities. The nursing paradigms concept is broad enough so that they can include any of the nursing theories. Moreover, all the concepts are relevant enough, and the central focus always remains on the client/person who is obtaining the treatment. So the nursing paradigm structure emphasized the client or the patient should be the central focus while devising any of nursing theory.

Although it may look like a trivial task, the medicine’s nonadherence globally causes much strain on the overall healthcare budget. Recently in England, a nonprofit organization has discovered that nonadherence to the medication caused an expenditure of 290 billion dollars in the year (wood, D.).

One of the main paradigms of nursing is the Fawcett theory. Nursing has the highest impact on the general quality of the healthcare setup. Adherence to medication has been a challenging problem since the last century, as medication adherence determines healthcare procedures. The need for the topic has urged researchers to have thorough research on the topic. Recent research in the journal of medicine in England has evaluated that almost half of the patients don’t take their medication as per the prescriptions. However, the reasons may vary widely (Brown, M. T., 2011). Nurses being the frontline dealers, can train the patient very well to understand the medication.

An interactive session with the patients can also do wonders in convincing the patients to follow the plan vigilantly. A team of researchers at Harvard University recently took a survey at the Birmingham women’s hospital and a Caremark pharmacy; the research showed the influential link between the nursing paradigm and drug adherence efficacy. The researchers concluded that the nurses who used to instruct their patients about the medication before leaving the hospital setup had a higher proportion of drug adherence than the others. Likewise, the patients with whom the pharmacists interacted and talked to them during the medicine selection procedure had a better impact on the patient’s adherence to the medication (Lauffenburger, J. C., 2018). Thus nursing paradigm has a more significant and direct influence on medication adherence than print media and emails.

The second paradigm the people paradigm also has a significant impact on medication adherence efficacy. Elderly patients’ nonadherence to the medication is a common scenario; the nonadherence among elderly patients is most exaggerated in psychiatric patients. In psychiatric patients, the behavior of the nonadherence to the medication not only varies between the individuals but also among the same individual at different times. The pattern of the behavior depends on the condition and severity of the illness. Patients’ compliance rate with medicine adherence varies from 38 to 57 percent in elderly psychiatric patients (Jimmy & Jose, 2011).

Inadequate knowledge about health and medical procedure is also one of the significant lackings of the people paradigm. According to estimation, the failure of medication adherence in elderly psychiatric patients often arises due to inadequate knowledge (Jimmy, B., 2011). Hence, they are reluctant to make medical decisions on their own. Moreover, the interventions’ success also heavily relies on the social and economic condition of the patient. Also, in the outpatient setting, the family’s involvement poses a greater risk in some cases. Sometimes, the family cannot spare much time to be physically and emotionally present with the patient throughout treatment.

The environment is one of the significant contributors to the attainment of the human experience. Thus the environment is undeniably a significant paradigm affecting human behaviors. Considering our POI, medicine adherence in the outpatient setting, the environment plays a more crucial part. In Fawcett’s paradigm model, the term environment encompasses the physical and geographical surroundings and includes all the social norms, rituals, and beliefs (Lam & Fresco, 2015). Thus if the environment is not made feasible for psychiatric patients, then medication adherence will significantly burgeon.

Health can be considered the interaction between the environment and the patient’s struggles to cope with a psychiatric disorder. According to the chosen POI, this paradigm will be the outcome of better medical compliance of psychiatric patients. If all the other paradigms perform their associated responsibilities in the outpatient settings, then the health paradigm will emerge as a promising result/outcome. However, the overall concept of health can be rational. But still, compromised health can be improved by caring nursing interventions, thus regulating medical adherence (Bahramnezhad, Asgari, & Afshar, 2015).

Grand Nursing Theory:

Generally, Grand Nursing theory refers to the set of ideas and concepts that help decide the actions’ core. In nursing, many theories have been proposed over time. The central theme behind these theories was establishing better work practices. In conclusion, the nursing theory can be referred to as a set of concepts driven by the nursing models and other interrelated disciplines. The nursing theories have a higher circle of application. These theories can help explain the patients’ behaviors, predict the intervention’s outcome, and guide further prescriptions. Nursing theories have been of two natures: inductive and deductive.

Many theorists like Myra Levine, Virginia Henderson, and jean Watson presented many grand theories to improve nursing practices. All the theorists mentioned above have presented grand theories that are patient concentric. In some way, all these theories emphasize designing and practicing the nursing course of action according to their requirements. The grand theory that has been selected is of jean Watson.

Jean Watson’s Grand Nursing Theory

Jean Watson’s grand nursing theory focused on the principle of caretaking. He defined care from a broader perspective in the medical environment, as unconditionally supporting, respectful, and non-judgmental while treating the patients. He also identified care as one of the significant contributors to psychological, emotional, and physical healing. Jean Watson’s theory defines care beyond the physical realms and insists on establishing the spiritual relationship between the medical healthcare professional and patients. Thus, it can be evaluated that jean’s theory was also targeting the nursing metaparadigm (Revels, Goldberg & Watson, 2016, p.234). Also, jean targeted the environment paradigm too. If a conductive and professional environment is provided to the nursing staff and the patients, it eases the nurse’s and the patients’ spiritual connection.

Medication Adherence in Psychiatric patients is very crucial, as stated earlier. Nonadherence to the medication is very often; the literature also shows that the outpatients with major psychiatric disorders are generally not medicine adherent on account of baseless reasoning, ignorance of the severity of illness, and the lack of surveillance (Colom F, 2002). The reasons mentioned above for the medicine’s nonadherence can easily be understood by applying jean Watson grand nursing theory. Moreover, as per the suggestion of Jean Watson, the transpersonal caring relationship can further help in devising the actions for coping with the issues. As previously mentioned, jean’s theory is patient-centric and emphasizes considering the individuals via a holistic approach. Thus the adaption of the theory will compile the healthcare professionals to let the individuals adapt to their illness and treatment procedures; so that they have better chances of recovery (YANGÖZ, Şefika & ÖZER, Zeynep, 2020).

Middle Range Theory:

Middle-Range Theories are operational in nature, especially when it comes to addressing problems in nursing practice, mainly the problems affecting vulnerable populations. These theories have a wide range of applications in nursing practice settings despite addressing definite phenomena in nursing practice. In this section, Bandura’s social cognitive theory will be explored for patients with mental disorders, precisely its relation to poor medication compliance in such patients. This theory states that a person’s cognitive processing is a form of reflective thinking that helps him set a behavior standard and then acquire a specific set of skills to meet that behavioral goal (Bandura, A., 1977). Bandura also asserts that self-efficacy is a crucial facilitator of cognition, behavior, and other environmental and personal influences. (Stacey et al. 2015) the elements of self-efficacy suggested by Bandura are the outcome expectations and self-efficacy expectations. He further explained in his theory that outcome expectation as a person thinking that his particular behavior will result in an individual income could be explained as believing that he can carry out a specific behavior to develop the desired outcome. In this case, a person may believe that his particular behavior can produce the desired outcome but may not necessarily believe that he can successfully continue that behavior in a longer run

Bandura’s approach has proposed self-effective sources, which were interrelated to each other. From the broader perspective comparing them to Fawcett’s paradigms, this approach encompassed the human paradigm specifically. In the first step, Bandura proposed that human behavior in response to various treatments has a particular relation to the individual’s physiological state. Relating it to our discussion, the physiological indicators of anxiety can have conformable influences on the psychiatric patient’s medication adherence. If the physiological indicator, i.e., anxiety, is left untreated, the patient can undergo severe behavioral changes affecting the medication procedure’s overall progress. The other area targeted by Bandura was the significance of verbal assertion. Verbal communication and verbal suggestions can have a long-term impact on the behavioral changes of psychiatric patients. As if the patient is undergoing medical nonadherence, then verbal persuasion can cast an impact.

Complexity Theory:

Upon discussing the complexity theory, it must be kept in mind that it does not refer to a single theory; however, it results from interdisciplinary theories. These theories are used to test and validate the systems that originate from interdisciplinary actions. These complex theories show the mechanics of these systems, but they also suggest how order can be kept in the system. The healthcare sector’s contemporary concerns can quickly be addressed by applying these complex theories (Braithwaite et al. 2017). The contemporary healthcare paradigm encompasses the staff’s professional development, research, development, clinical practice, etc.

Medical adherence can be increased in psychiatric patients by analyzing the healthcare setup’s organizational structure using complexity theory as modern-day healthcare issues need an intuitive approach and dynamic view (Anthony & Vidal, 2018). In our POI case, the healthcare professional can adapt varied communication techniques to alter the behavioral changes that hamper medical adherence.

Ethical Framework and Principle:

For keeping the medical adherence ratio higher following ethical frameworks can be implemented. As many of the grand nursing theories suggest keeping the patient-centric system, so devising the medication plans after analyzing the behavior and response of the patient can increase medication adherence. As digital records have replaced paper-based records, if the hospital setups make sure that they introduce the centralized patient record database for the out setting patients, it can bring magnificent changes. As the in-house admitted patients have routine procedures, and the nursing staff is quite well familiar with each patient’s psychiatric behavior, it’s easy for them to develop medication adherence in them. However, for the outpatient setting, this is not feasible. Also, there are fair chances that the patient loses track of the medication between the visits. In these scenarios, the centralized server’s use can keep the patient medical history, prescribed medicine, and dosage. Suppose the hospital shares the server access with the rest of the paradigms like the physician, psychiatrist, and pharmacist. In that case, each one can perform its job by better understanding the process specificity (O’Connor A, 2007). For out-setting patients, the education of the family members is essential. Raising concern, knowledge, and awareness regarding psychiatric disorders can make the family members more considerate and responsible, and thus they can create a feasible environment for developing medical adherence (Kamran, A., 2014).

The promotion of the one-to-one sessions and introducing the shared decision-making strategy can increase the psychiatric patients’ involvement in making the medication plan (Ramli, A, 2012). The greater the patients’ involvement will signify the mutual agreement, the greater the chances of developing medical adherence. Also, sets of standardized questionnaires are present to evaluate adherence rates like the Morisky adherence scale and BMQ (brief medication questionnaire) (Elwyn, G., 2012). These questionnaires greatly help in identifying the root cause and minimizing the incidence of noncompliance with the medication.

Conclusion

The adherence to medicine in elderly patients can be significantly improved by understanding the noncompliance’s actual cause. Once the actual cause of the nonadherence to the medication plan is understood, the outpatient setting nonadherence incidences can be reduced significantly (Hugtenburg, J. G., 2013). As in the wake of jean’s theory, if the treatment plan will be devised according to the patient’s concerns, significant gaps in the psychiatric patients’ handling will be bridged. Increasing the patient’s awareness and literacy about the actual illness and its severity level can positively reform medication adherence. Moreover, effective patient monitoring plans have proven to be of higher accuracy than conventional self-reporting. Thus inculcation of the technology, digital devices for keeping track of medication adherence in outpatients setting can work correctly as the conventional practice of self-reporting is often objected to with low sensitivity.

References

World Health Organization. (2003). ADHERENCE TO LONG-TERM THERAPIES (W 85). WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.

Semahegn, A., Torpey, K., Manu, A., Assefa, N., Tesfaye, G., & Ankomah, A. (2020). Psychotropic medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with major psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1274-3

Chaffee, M. W., & McNeill, M. M. (2007). A model of nursing as a complex adaptive system. Nursing Outlook, 55(5), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.04.003

Lee, R. C., & Fawcett, J. (2013). The Influence of the Metaparadigm of Nursing on Professional Identity Development Among RN-BSN Students. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26(1), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318412466734

Wood, D. (n.d.). Home. Retrieved October 31, 2020, from https://www.rn.com/Pages/ResourceDetails.aspx?id=3411

Brown, M. T., & Bussell, J. K. (2011). Medication adherence: WHO cares?. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 86(4), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0575

Lauffenburger, J. C., Choudhry, N. K., (2018)  A call for a systems-thinking approach to medication adherence: Stop blaming the patient. JAMA Internal Medicine 2018;178(7):950-951.

Jimmy, B., & Jose, J. (2011). Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman Medical Journal, 26(3), 155–159.

Lam, W. Y., & Fresco, P. (2015). Medication adherence measures: An overview. BioMed Research International, 2015, 217047.

Jimmy, B., & Jose, J. (2011). Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman medical journal, 26(3), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2011.38

Bahramnezhad, Fatemeh & Shiri, Mahmoud & Asgari, Parvaneh & Farokhnezhad Afshar, Pouya. (2015). A Review of the Nursing Paradigm. Open Journal of Nursing. 05. 17-23. 10.4236/ojn.2015.51003.

Revels, A., Goldberg, L., & Watson, J. (2016). Caring science: A theoretical framework for palliative care in the emergency department. International Journal for Human Caring, 20(4), 206–212.

Colom, F., & Vieta, E. (2002). Nonadherence in psychiatric disorders: misbehavior or clinical feature?. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105(3), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1e003.x

YANGÖZ, Şefika & ÖZER, Zeynep. (, 2020). Nursing Approach Based on Watson’s Theory of Human Caring in Treatment Adherence in Hemodialysis Patients. Bezmialem Science. 8. 189-195. 10.14235/bas.galenos.2019.3546.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Braithwaite, J., et al. (2017). Complexity Science in Healthcare-Aspirations, Approaches, Applications and Accomplishments: A White Paper. Macquarie University

Anthony, M. K., & Vidal, K. (2018). Innovative Approach to Reconstruct Bedside Handoff: Using Simple Rules of Complexity Science to Promote Partnership With Patients. Journal of nursing care quality, 33(2), 128-134

Ramli, A., Ahmad, N. S., & Paraidathathu, T. (2012). Medication adherence among hypertensive patients of primary health clinics in Malaysia. Patient preference and adherence, 6, 613–622. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S34704

Kamran, A., Sadeghieh Ahari, S., Biria, M., Malepour, A., & Heydari, H. (2014). Determinants of Patient’s Adherence to Hypertension Medications: Application of Health Belief Model Among Rural Patients. Annals of medical and health sciences research, 4(6), 922–927. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144914

O’Connor A, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, et al. Toward the “tipping point”: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007;26(3):716–25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.

Hugtenburg, J. G., Timmers, L., Elders, P. J., Vervloet, M., & van Dijk, L. (2013). Definitions, variants, and causes of nonadherence with medication: a challenge for tailored interventions. Patient preference and adherence, 7, 675–682. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S29549