The initial impression is an elaborate but specific paper. The author is particular on the topics to discuss. Also, there are few sentence construction structures, but the paper otherwise suffices in conveying the intended information. Further, the author uses long sentences showing the lack of sentence-construction skills.
I relate to the bullying by students towards teachers theory. Being a female student, I have experienced abusive and sarcastic students. Also, over the last few years, there have been rumours about me; both personal and professional. However, from my experience, these are mostly harmless student’s ways of getting back at teachers.
Through my career, I have been a victim of bullying from teachers and schools heads. I have recently concluded that, even though seeking help from the supervisors and other relevant officials to be effective, it only lasts a while. The bullying is as a result of some inferiority complex noticed in me. Hence I have resolved to change; be more principled and decisive.
The article on Paternalistic Leadership relationship with Bullying shows how proficient the author is. The summary illustrates the problem, analyses the cause and concludes with a solution.
The article on bullying of women refers to women in higher university but the author, in his summary, talks about the employed female. The author should have limited the summary to the women in higher education only. Because the author lacks a flow of ideas, the paragraphs in this article seem not to belong to the same topic. The author should proofread the article to ensure proper flow and sentence construction.
The paper portrays a writer that implored critical thinking of his ideas and arguments. Though with a few grammatical errors, the main ideas are presented correctly. Conformity to the APA styles of writing is also commendable. Proper in-text citations further better the first impression of the work.