Aristotle presented his perception of virtue by clarifying that virtues are not feelings and should not be treated as one. As such a virtue can’t be treated as a person’s capacity, but a better explanation of it illuminates the evident relation of a settled disposition in reaction to the passion that can be referred to as a properly functioning example of a human being. Virtuous actions can satisfy a person and ensure pleasure in doing so. However, it is only enjoyable if the person performing the act believes in his actions and knows they enjoy what they are doing. The sole purpose of defining a Virtuous act is to identify the fundamental understanding between right and wrong.
All points considered, it is safe to establish the basis of an ethically correct virtue and the practice involved in performing it correctly. From the ethical point of virtue, it is best elaborated as a practice entirely focused on improving the morality of the agent’s character rather than their actions. Through this perception, acts can be perceived as a symbolic representation of a person’s preference toward what they wish to become, and their approach to defining themselves. Aristotle explained virtuous acts to be a way of life that brings joy and happiness to people who perform them and continue to do so as they live on. From Aristotle’s defined perspective of virtue, the acts of trustfulness, loyalty, and honesty can be categorized as acts of virtue. These three present a state of satisfaction that people cannot measure but accept its contribution towards a better feeling. Loyalty, for instance, can be rewarding by itself. By adopting the role of a loyal friend, husband, or employee, one can have a stress-free relationship or association with the people around them. This will eliminate the uncertainty of being unfaithful and will award another person’s loyalty in response.
