Politics and the English Language is literature written by George Orwell that reflects the relationship between politics and the degradation of language. The author focuses on the language used in politics, which is designed to imply lies sound truthful and make killing respectable. In this context, the author connects the decline of English to the tarnishing of politics and its processes. He emphasizes the importance of fighting against vague and incorrect language. According to him, the English language becomes ugly and inaccurate since the orator’s thoughts are as well erroneous and indistinct. Based on these ideas, he concludes that compactness and clearness should be adopted instead of indistinctness and self-interest over political conformism.
The fundamental concept of Orwell’s essay is that how people utilize language is a political ideology. He reminds language users to be constantly on guard against tripping into any standard English that limits society to the prevailing political ideologies. In this essay, Orwell gives insight and exposes political jargon in full analysis and how it impacts English terminologies. His facts are based on political issues, and politics itself is full of hatred, lies, and folly language.
Orwell is aware of discrepancies in the political atmosphere which are absurd and therefore language is bound to suffer. He perceives language as a political matter, and that language usage and clichés ease political supremacists to use perverse language to conceal undesired political facts deliberately. He believes that bad language was a lead for repressive ideologies and no wonder the English language was developed after World War two. George sets forth the corrupting habits that mislead English users to reason poorly, resulting in poor grammar when writing. He gives full insights into the fake, pretentious, compromised, and fact-less language in his list. Mostly, in his arguments, most people are indolent and, therefore, misusing language. By setting phrases, political authors result in facts and opinions that do not meet intellect criteria. Independent thinking is essential in ensuring an effective political life. However, compromised language drives away independent thinking and hence serves a political purpose.
With the objection to language use, Orwell effectively demonstrates the effect of deception brought by numerous political vocabularies, depicting how prominent, composite, and conceptual language directly covers inappropriate and violent actual truths. In this way, conceptual language becomes a base through which political writers can justify wrongs done by political leaders. He also sets forth a roll of measures that can be used to counteract deceitful language. The author views the usage of authentic language as a political act by itself as a way of resisting all manipulation. He supports his claim that language is a weapon, not a natural evolutionary growth, and it’s easy to manipulate. However, writers need to apply conscious efforts to avoid language alteration.
In conclusion, Orwell believes that thoughtless and enthusiastically misleading language can be pinpointed and opposed through mimicry and most of all through an industrious obligation to true representation. He connects the thick language line to politics and economy. Still, he blames English users for having folly thoughts and imitations which can be exempted if language users take the necessary steps towards political regeneration. Struggling against language decadence would help to curb general abuse of language as well as bad language beliefs.
