Since the emergence of the film industry, film has been considered a relevant art and a valuable commodity, forming part of human livelihood. However, today, many people seem to question whether film producers do their work responsibly and as required by society, suggesting they should mobilize moral obligation in their actions.
The question as to whether filmmakers of Hollywood should consider morality in their production is not merely an ethical issue. Still, it is intrinsically linked to the way people are affected by what they see as per their interpretation of what they watch. They are applying the film action in their actual contexts. As a result, the issues become crucial and controversial, attracting various arguments as to why filmmakers should maintain moral obligations during their production process. However, This essay will give an overview of why filmmakers should not be restricted from considering moral obligations during their productions. They should do their work freely.
People define art in different ways. For example, one would set architecture as an inspiration to truth and beauty, whereas another views art as entertaining and informing us of what we don’t know. Max, from anomalous materials, for example, stated that films are produced to entertain people, help them understand themselves, know better things around them, and transform them into better people. Therefore, given an artwork, various judgments will arise based on what the viewer expects of a film or his belief of what forms a movie. A filmmaker cannot choose whose view to adhere to, for they do their work for all, reflecting all the good and bad constituted in real society. Therefore, viewers should select and watch films that interest them. How about every viewer restricting them from accessing the kind of cinema they detest? Since filmmakers do ample production suiting the audience at large, the task is for the viewer to choose.
Moreover, there are different types of films: War tales and historical-based movies. War films, for example, are paired with other genres, such as action, romance, and suspense. We can’t expect a filmmaker of a war film to neglect the romance part of a movie because it’s dirty or immoral. He introduces that in his movie only tells it forms part of the film continuation. Art is good when completed and standardized. Given the role is violent or exposes sexual acts, it can be skipped or stopped in control of the audience. Viewer’s guides are available in most film productions. Thereby, one is allowed to check the guide to realize if it’s of her morals. If it’s of some genre termed immorally, you can avoid watching. Parental guides are available in most programs; hence, children are guided by the kind of film that suits their view. The moral obligation will only restrict filmmakers on subjects to write about for no good reason when the resolution to the viewer’s concerns is identical.
It is argued that Young viewers are subjected to practicing what they watch. Immoral films can negatively hinder their thinking, leading to a corrupt society, thereby killing the visions of that community.
Since the future relies on them, a Filmmaker must reflect humanity in all dimensions. If immoral acts like unintended pregnancy in a film seem okay, it doesn’t mean viewers should consider applying them in the real world. Films are only used to inform and make viewers understand their society in depth.
In conclusion, it is essential that we support Filmmakers in their productions without considering moral obligation. Instead of debating about it, we should play our role as viewers. By accepting, we can create a conducive environment for the filmmakers and us, too.
References
Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style & mode of production to 1960. Columbia University Press. Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66-78.
