Abstract
Introduction: This is a research based study which based on the passenger satisfaction on the system failure. Henceforth, the focus of the author is to determine the factors that can hit the customer integrity in terms of delivering poor services to customers. The topic is based on the systems service failure for the passengers at the airports for example (online check-in ,self-service check-in ET)
Research Purpose: The purpose of this study is to measure the level of customer expectation in the premises of aviation industry by keeping the system high-tech and automated.
Research Objectives: To conduct a passenger’s perception from system failure in check-in and self-service check-in and to discover the types of system failures that may occur in the aviation industry.
Research significance: This study contributes an understanding to aviation industry by determining the different issues to the system failure in order to determine ways to resolve the issue to provide satisfaction to the passengers.
Problem Statement: To analyze the passenger’s perception from system failure in check-in and self-service check-in by discovering the types of system failures that may occur in the aviation industry. Individual diversion is imperative factor in flying choices of traveler. Online seat booking, call focus offices and reservation/cancelation is most elevated affecting component in flying choices of the travelers.
Title: Passenger’s satisfaction on the system service failure
INTRODUCTION
This is a research based study which based on the passenger satisfaction on the system failure. This study is conducted in the aviation industry and it is based on the passenger satisfaction. The aviation industry is one of the important industries that play its significant role in the economic development. This industry has its own unique significance which cannot be neglected. Therefore, the focusing on all the related consequences is really important to determine. For this purpose, it is essential to measure the level of customer expectation in the premises of Aviation industry (Smith, 2018). It is very important to make a Check-in process quick and responsive. It is because passenger hate to you stays in the long ques. Henceforth, the focus of the author is to determine the factors that can hit the customer integrity in terms of delivering poor services to customers. The topic is based on the systems service failure for the passengers at the airports for example li (online check-in ,self-service check-in ET) main issue is about when the airlines or airport when they have a failure in these system service failure so regarding to this the research focusing on the passengers satisfaction on the system service failure. It is determined in the study of Alsyof, (2018) that check in process has been existed since the very early decades of air transport. A lot of changes have been made in check in process in terms of making fair and traditional airport process.
However, later than this traditional process is started to replace by the very first self-service process. The automation or self-service process is started in 1990 in order to transform way of passengers for flight check in. This automation and self- service technology have significantly impacted the performance of Aviation industry in terms of satisfying passengers. The process of checking was all over considered as a single process but this is in itself a combination of different small processes. In addition to this, the efficiency and efficacy in such process is highly needed in order to deliver the best quality services to the passengers. In addition to this, check in process includes the confirmation of ticket, are confirmed place assigning on the flight mode board and delivering boarding passes you the passenger (Migacz, 2018). more over this process also include checking of the all travel documents and luggage holding which is done further carried out by the air craft cargo. But, with the implementation of self-services alternative or automation services provide a new way to aviation industry to attract and satisfy the customers. In the self-service process each of the entity is done under its own technique and it has made the process effective and efficient. The focus of this study is to analyses the reason behind the failure of automation process.
It is due to the reason that the failure of self-services or automation process in aviation industry is very disturbing for the passengers. The aircraft services are the most efficient and time saving services, therefore, it is highly needed to keep the system automatic and efficient in order to attract and satisfy the passenger. The failure of such system is very disappointing situation for the passengers. Therefore implementation of Hi-Technology practice in making his system coherent for the passengers is highly needed. The concern of the author is on determining the factors behind the failure of automation process in order to heap the process Bible and efficient one. Though, it is discussed in the study that how aviation industry focuses on minimizing such issues in order to deliver best quality services to the passengers. It is due to the reason that the main aim of the aviation industry is to the level best quality services to passengers in order to retain them. In this research an analysis is conducted on a passenger’s perception from system failure in check-in and self-service check-in (Billings, 2018). It is determined in the article about the relationship between passengers and IT technology services. It is identified in the research regarding the impact of the service recovery on the passengers and to determine whether the passengers can have a full service recovery from the system failure.
Background
It is highlighted in the study of that Zhang (2018); check in process has been existed since the early many years of air transport. A considerable measure of changes has been made under control in process as far as making reasonable and conventional airplane terminal process. But, with the passage of time this customary procedure is begun to supplant by the main self-service process. The computerization or self-services process is begun in 1990 keeping in mind the end goal to change method for travelers for flight check in. This mechanization and self-services innovation have altogether affected the execution of Aviation industry regarding fulfilling travelers satisfactions. The way toward checking-in a solitary a big giant procedure however this is in itself a blend of various little procedures that needs to be focused in order to complete the all formalities. Moreover, check in process incorporates the affirmation of ticket, are affirmed put doling out on the flight mode load up and conveying passes to the passengers. In addition to this, the procedure incorporate with the checking of the all movement archives and baggage holding which is done additionally did by the aircraft sector.
In any case, with the execution of self-administrations option or computerization administrations give another approach to flying industry to draw in attention and fulfill the passenger’s satisfaction. In the self-service process every one of the substance is done under its own particular strategy and it has made the procedure compelling and effective. It is noted that Aviation industry has dependably been celebrated for its ceaseless battle: cutting expenses, overseeing fluctuating interest, staying aware of best quality prerequisites while attempting to look after predominant benefits and fulfill needs of different passengers. Consumer loyalty has been on exceptionally low levels for a considerable length of time, and e.g. as indicated by American Customer Satisfaction Index, aircraft industry scores most minimal out of 47 different ventures. It is due to the reason that, the interest for air transportation has been found in a stable state but many of the reasons including long check-in process has taken the aviation industry in the account of deep crises. In this hardest condition, aircrafts are compelled to move their concentration towards passenger-oriented services (Ecolab, 2018).
It is critical for aircraft not exclusively to comprehend the impression of passengers to deliver quality services. However, the focus is on to discover what passengers anticipate from the aircraft employees and what sort of qualitative services passengers considered imperative in general. In the aviation business, administrations are made out of extremely complex blend of intangibles because the aviation industry does not offer any physical products but the unique experience and performance to the passengers. Thus, providing qualitative services to the passengers is a key to attract passengers in order to retain them.
The focal point of this study is to examinations the purpose for the failure of computerization process. It is because of the reason that the failure of self-administrations or computerization process in avionics industry is exceptionally irritating for the passengers. The flying machine administrations are the most effective and efficient administrations, in this manner, it is exceedingly expected to keep the framework programmed and proficient with a specific end goal to draw in and fulfill the passenger (Khan, 2017). The failure of such framework is exceptionally disillusioning circumstance for the passengers. In this way execution of Hi-Technology rehearses in making his framework rational for the passengers is exceptionally required. The worry of the creator is on deciding the variables behind the failure of computerization process with a specific end goal to pile the procedure Bible and productive one.
However, it is talked about in the examination that how development industry centers around limiting such issues keeping in mind the end goal to convey best quality administrations to the passengers. It is because of the reason that the primary point of the aeronautics business is to the level best quality administrations to passengers with a specific end goal to retain the customers. The systems service failure for the passengers airplanes terminals for instance like (online registration, self-benefit registration ET) is the primary issue centers in the examination. It is resolved that when the carriers or airplane terminal have a disappointment in this system benefit makes issues for the passengers. It is the idea of human that sitting tight too yearn for the specific thing causes the unsettling influence and it transforms into the disappointment and disillusionments (Bing, 2017). The worry of the creator, with respect to this the examination is concentrating on deciding the level of the passenger’s fulfillment on the system service failure and what the influence is of system failure on the passengers (Stamolampros, 2018).
Research Purpose
The purpose of the research is to determine the systems service failure for the passengers at the airports for example like (online check-in, self-service check-in ET). The purpose of this study is to measure the level of customer expectation in the premises of aviation industry by keeping the system high-tech and automated. This study is conducted to determine the different types of system failures that may occur in the aviation industry and the impact of the service recovery on the passengers.
Research Gap/ Rationale
It is determined that the research gap is essential to focus during conducting any research. However, it is evaluated that, there is a few studies available on this system failure of various implemented check-in or self-services processes at the airport. It is analyzed there is no significant studies conducted or available on the relationship between the IT implications and delivering better quality services to customers (Newton, 2017). Therefore, this study is conducted to determine the different aspects of the failure of system and its impact on the passengers level of satisfaction and what are the consequences of Information Technology is essential to focus to create a better relationship between it practices and passengers satisfactions
Research Problems
The systems service failure for the passengers at the airports for example like (online check-in, self-service check-in ET) is the main issue focuses in the study. It is determined that when the airlines or airport have a failure in this system service creates problems for the passengers. It is the nature of human that waiting too long for the particular thing causes the disturbance and it turns into the dissatisfaction and disappointments (Helmreich, 2017). The concern of the author, regarding to this the research is focusing on determining the level of the passenger’s satisfaction on the system service failure and what the influence is of system failure on the passengers. However, the problem statement is stated as follows:
To analyze the passenger’s perception from system failure in check-in and self-service check-in by discovering the types of system failures that may occur in the aviation industry.
Research Aims/ Objectives
Following stated are the research aims and objectives of the study; it essential to make objectives to achieve the study target;
- To conduct a passenger’s perception from system failure in check-in and self-service check-in
- To discover the types of system failures that may occur in the aviation industry
- To identify the relationship between passengers and IT technology services
- To determine whether the passengers can have a full service recovery from the system failure
- To identify the impact of the service recovery on the passengers
Research Questions
Following stated are the research questions of the study; it essential to make questions to analyze the purpose of the study;
- Question 1) what are the types the system failures that affect the aviation industry?
- Question2) what the impact of the system failure on passengers?
- Question3) can the passengers have the full service recovery from the system failure
- Question 4) what is the passenger’s perceptions from the system failures?
Significance of the Study
It is observed that the aviation industry is one of the most effective industries that elaborate its role in the development of the economy. This study contributes an understanding to aviation industry by determining the different issues to the system failure in order to determine ways to resolve the issue to provide satisfaction to the passengers. The study is contributing an understanding between the passengers and IT technology services in order to determine whether the passengers can have a full service recovery from the system failure or the aviation industry is going to suffer.
Limitation
The examination of the degree of study was constrained to a specific demographical lands ere tended to in the study. The flights with mid-run full system transporters and minimal effort aircrafts have been taken into thought in the study and also the aircraft order is additionally discussed. It is noted that the extravagance aircrafts and over delayed flights were removed from the extension with a specific end goal to confine various properties what’s more, adjust the service desires of the passengers. Ordinarily, services desires are unique and more mind boggling when flying on longer flight in business or top of the line which is not offered by many flights. Such key administration and quality measurements of services as a wellbeing, flight recurrence, dependability and so on were considered on different level with the examination concentrating on service traits, for example, speed of registration, stimulation and providing food on board and also workers’ disposition at the board. At the last, the exploration does not have much effect between ground and in-flight services however the conceivable contrasts and intricacies identified with such refinement and recovery of the system is determined in the study in order to visualize its influence on the satisfaction level of the passengers (Dekker, 2017).
Chapter 2 Literature Review
Introduction
In this segment, the writing of the literature review is exhibited in expounds the further comprehension of the theme. It is basic to done the literature review to recognize the point of view and impression of the previously held research with a specific end goal to decide the noteworthiness of the system failures that may occur in the aviation industry. Furthermore, it is part to demonstrate the examination of the distinctive writing identified with the issue of the exploration. The related data have been observed from the past examinations, articles, and writings. In this area the main focus of the author is identifying the basic examination acquired from the past writing to convey the hypothetical comprehension of the acts of the system failures that may occur in the aviation industry (Mariuno, 2017).
It is denoted in the study of the Doly (2018) the online check-in is the way of checking the passengers at the air terminal in order to deliver them the best services in the aviation industry. It is highly significant to make the online check-in process effective and efficient in order to deliver the best services to the passengers. However, the failure in system will not be acceptable by the passengers. It is due to the reason that aviation industry is one of the unique service selling industries and no compromise in delivering the services to the passengers is acceptable. Therefore, it is essential to make the systems work in the fast pace process and with technological implementation in order to deliver the best services to the customers.
According to the author Deneete (2018), it is sated that it is significant to identify the relationship between passengers and IT technology services. It is due to the reason that high technological factors will enables aviation industry to bring significant changes in the system in order to deliver the best and unique services to the customers. It is essential to make the system highly dependable on the latest technology in order to stay highly competitive in terms of delivering best services to the customers. In addition to this, it is important to check the system on regular basis of the for the maintenance of the system. The aircraft services are the most efficient and time saving services, therefore, it is highly needed to keep the system automatic and efficient in order to attract and satisfy the passenger. The failure of such system is very disappointing situation for the passengers. Therefore implementation of Hi-Technology practice in making his system coherent for the passengers is highly needed.
Passenger fulfillment in aircraft has turned out to be basically essential and according to the study of Darby (2018), it is recommend that as rivalry made by deregulation has turn out to be more extraordinary, benefit quality in the aircraft business has additionally gotten more consideration. Carrier organizations likewise endeavored to separate their administrations using mechanized reservation frameworks which were likewise intended to make customer reliability in the circulation channels. In addition to this, regardless of the airlines‟ endeavors to separate their administrations, a broad study of continuous fliers led. It is determined that customers did not see any distinction starting with one transporter then onto the next. It is begin with the experimental arrangement for the possibility that apparent administration quality prompted fulfillment and contended that administration quality was really a precursor of consumer satisfaction. It was confirmed that administration experience fulfillment was very particular from general fulfillment and saw quality. Administration quality will change; the definitions are altogether defined from the customer point of view: that is, the thing that customers perceptions are the vital measurements of value. It is pioneers in the conceptualization of the administration quality develop, these creators kept up that the general impression of value was a disconfirmation of a customer’s desire and assessment of an administrations conveyed by keeping the system effective and efficient.
It is meant in the investigation of the Corine, (2018) the online registration is the method for checking the travelers at the air terminal so as to convey them the best administrations in the aeronautics business. It is exceptionally critical to influence the online registration process powerful and effective to convey the best administrations to the travelers. In any case, the disappointment in framework won’t be adequate by the travelers. It is because of the reason that flying industry is one of the novel administration offering enterprises and no trade off in conveying the administrations to the travelers is satisfactory. In this way, it is fundamental to influence the frameworks to work in the quick pace process and with mechanical execution keeping in mind the end goal to convey the best administrations to the clients.
From three sorts of class of experience decisions, the travelers are greatly evaluated to the context of transporters. While analyzing measurement profile of the travelers, educated and high wage travelers are using flights more frequently. Failure to give quality organizations to travelers may hurt the improvement of flying machine picture and cause negative impact on passengers‟ behavioral points. These revelations recommend that flying machine companies‟ in-flight advantage quality depends on the assorted movement techniques passed on. It is featured in the investigation of that Zhang (2018); check in process has been existed since the early numerous times of air transport. A significant measure of changes has been made under control in process the extent that influencing sensible and regular plane terminal to process. Be that as it may, with the progression of time this standard method is started to supplant by the principle self-benefit process. The computerization or self-administrations process is started in 1990 remembering the ultimate objective to change strategy for explorers for flight check in. This motorization and self-administrations advancement have by and large influenced the execution of Aviation industry with respect to satisfying traveler’s fulfillment (Billings, 2017)
The flights with mid-run full framework transporters and insignificant exertion air ships have been taken into thought in the examination and furthermore the air ship arrange is also talked about. It is noticed that the indulgence flying machines and over deferred flights were expelled from the expansion with a particular true objective to restrict different properties what’s more, modify the administration wants of the travelers (Sun, 2017). Usually, administrations wants are extraordinary and more personality boggling when flying on longer flight in business or top notch which isn’t offered by numerous flights. Such key organization and quality estimations of administrations as a prosperity, flight repeat, and trustworthiness et cetera were considered on various level with the examination focusing on benefit characteristics, for instance, speed of enrollment, incitement and giving nourishment on load up and furthermore laborers’ mien at the load up (Puri, 2017). At the last, the investigation does not have much impact amongst ground and in-flight benefits however the possible stands out and complexities distinguished from such refinement and recuperation of the framework is resolved in the examination with a specific end goal to envision its effect on the fulfillment level of the travelers (Baher, 2018).
As indicated by the author Chang (2018), it is satiated that it is critical to recognize the connection amongst travelers and IT innovation administrations. It is because of the reason that high innovative components will empowers avionics industry to get huge changes the framework keeping in mind the end goal to convey the best quality service to the customers. It is basic to make the framework profoundly reliable on the most recent innovation with a specific end goal to remain exceptionally focused as far as conveying best administrations to the clients. Likewise, it is imperative to check the framework on standard premise to keep the system framework effective and efficient (Washington, 2014). The air ship administrations are the most effective and efficient administrations, in this manner, it is profoundly expected to keep the framework programmed and proficient to pull in and fulfill the traveler. The disappointment of such framework is exceptionally disillusioning circumstance for the travelers. In this manner execution of Hi-Technology hone in making his framework sound for the travelers is exceedingly required (Marasi, 2018).
The process of checking was all over considered as a single process but this is in itself a combination of different small processes. In addition to this, the efficiency and efficacy in such process is highly needed in order to deliver the best quality services to the passengers. In addition to this, check in process includes the confirmation of ticket, are confirmed place assigning on the flight mode board and delivering boarding passes you the passenger (Migacz, 2018).
It is critical for aircraft not exclusively to comprehend the impression of passengers to deliver quality services. However, the focus is on to discover what passengers anticipate from the aircraft employees and what sort of qualitative services passengers considered imperative in general. In the aviation business, administrations are made out of extremely complex blend of intangibles because the aviation industry does not offer any physical products but the unique experience and performance to the passengers (Bitner, 2018).
The motivation behind this examination is to research the effect of the in-flight benefit quality on passenger satisfaction. This examination involves that aircraft showcasing administrator’s needs to create different arrangements to give ensured quality administrations to passengers (Kettunen, 2018). Aircraft benefit measurements were found to have critical and positive impacts on carrier picture and passengers satisfaction goals. In this examination, passengers are fulfilled to the administration provision and general offices conveyed by the aircraft organizations. The passengers are happy with the administrations quality conveyed in-flight benefit, in-flight computerized benefit and back office tasks (lehaman, 2018). From three sorts of class of adventure choices, the passengers are much appraised to the context carriers. While dissecting statistic profile of the passengers, taught and high wage passengers are utilizing flights all the more often.
Inability to give quality administrations to passengers may harm the development of aircraft picture and cause negative effect on passengers‟ behavioral aims. These discoveries suggest that aircraft companies‟ in-flight benefit quality relies on the diverse conveyance procedures conveyed. It is highlighted in the study of that Zhang (2018); check in process has been existed since the early many years of air transport. A considerable measure of changes has been made under control in process as far as making reasonable and conventional airplane terminal process. But, with the passage of time this customary procedure is begun to supplant by the main self-service process. The computerization or self-services process is begun in 1990 keeping in mind the end goal to change method for travelers for flight check in. This mechanization and self-services innovation have altogether affected the execution of Aviation industry regarding fulfilling passenger’s satisfaction (Stolzer, 2018).
The flights with mid-run full system transporters and minimal effort aircrafts have been taken into thought in the study and also the aircraft order is additionally discussed. It is noted that the extravagance aircrafts and over delayed flights were removed from the extension with a specific end goal to confine various properties what’s more, adjust the service desires of the passengers (Dercekers, 2018). Ordinarily, services desires are unique and more mind boggling when flying on longer flight in business or top of the line which is not offered by many flights (razie, 2018). Such key administration and quality measurements of services as a wellbeing, flight recurrence, and dependability and so on were considered on different level with the examination concentrating on service traits, for example, speed of registration, stimulation and providing food on board and also workers’ disposition at the board (Billings, 2017). At the last, the exploration does not have much effect between ground and in-flight services however the conceivable contrasts and intricacies identified with such refinement and recovery of the system is determined in the study in order to visualize its influence on the satisfaction level of the passengers. It is imitated by the aviation industry to implement more in the research and development department to bring appropriate changes in the systems and to execute into the high mechanical variables to acquire huge changes the general public circumstances (Proctor, 2018).
The aviation industry is one of the prominent industries that play its highly significant role in the economic contribution. Therefore it is required to keep the system in aviation industry prosper to qualities circumstance in order to delivers best services to the customers. This is a research based study which based on the passenger satisfaction on the system failure (Jaffari, 2017). This study is conducted in the aviation industry and it is based on the passenger satisfaction. The aviation industry is one of the important industries that play its significant role in the economic development. This industry has its own unique significance which cannot be neglected. Therefore, the focusing on all the related consequences is really important to determine. For this purpose, it is essential to measure the level of customer expectation in the premises of Aviation industry (Smith, 2018). It is very important to make a Check-in process quick and responsive. It is because passenger hate to you stays in the long ques. Henceforth, the focus of the author is to determine the factors that can hit the customer integrity in terms of delivering poor services to customers.
The topic is based on the systems service failure for the passengers at the airports for example li (online check-in ,self-service check-in ET) main issue is about when the airlines or airport when they have a failure in these system service failure so regarding to this the research focusing on the passengers satisfaction on the system service failure. It is determined in the study of Alsyof, (2018) that check in process has been existed since the very early decades of air transport. A lot of changes have been made in check in process in terms of making fair and traditional airport process. However, later than this traditional process is started to replace by the new technological system that enables the organization to achieve its goal in effective and profound manner (Wiegmann, 2017).
References
Alsyouf, I., Kumar, U., Al-Ashi, L., & Al-Hammadi, M. 2018. Improving baggage flow in the baggage handling system at a UAE-based airline using lean Six Sigma tools. Quality Engineering, (just-accepted), 00-00.
Billings, C.E., 2018. Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. CRC Press.
Bitner, M.J. and Hubbert, A.R. (2018), “Encounter satisfaction vs. overall satisfaction and quality”, Sage Publications, pp. 72-94.
Boyd WL, Leonard M, and White C. (2018). “Customer preferences for financial services: An analysis”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 12(1), pp. 9-12.
Butler, G. F. and Keller, M. R. (1992). “The cost-constrained global airline industry environment: what is quality?”,Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp.599-618.
Chang, Y. and Keller, M. R. (2018). “A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 139, pp. 166-177.
Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S.A. (2018), “Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, pp. 55-68. ]
Darby, I. (2018). “NatWest hires shop to build community links”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 26(3), pp. 23-35.
Dennet, C.E., Ineson, M., Stone, G.J., and Colgate, M. (2018), “Pre-Bookable Services in the Chartered Airline Industry: Increasing Satisfaction through Differentiation”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 20 (2), pp. 82-94.
Doyle P, and Wong V. (2018), “Marketing and competitive performance, an empirical study”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32(5/6), pp. 514-535.
Migacz, S.J., Zou, S. and Petrick, J.F., 2018. The “Terminal” Effects of Service Failure on Airlines: Examining Service Recovery with Justice Theory. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), pp.83-98.
Smits, R., 2018. A research to the influence of failure severity on customer satisfaction and loyalty. Does failure type influence the impact on the customer in the airline industry(Master’s thesis, Open Universiteit Nederland).
Stamolampros, P., Korfiatis, N., Kourouthanassis, P. and Symitsi, E., 2018. Flying to Quality: Cultural Influences on Online Reviews. Journal of Travel Research.
Zhang, A. and Zhang, Y., 2018. Airline economics and finance. In The Routledge Companion to Air Transport Management(pp. 171-188). Routledge London and New York.
Stolzer, A. J., Friend, M. A., Truong, D., Tuccio, W. A., & Aguiar, M. (2018). Measuring and evaluating safety management system effectiveness using Data Envelopment Analysis. Safety Science, 104, 55-69.
Rezaei, J., Kothadiya, O., Tavasszy, L., & Kroesen, M. (2018). Quality assessment of airline baggage handling systems using SERVQUAL and BWM. Tourism Management, 66, 85-93.
Proctor, R.W. and Van Zandt, T., 2018. Human factors in simple and complex systems. CRC press.
Lehmann, E. E., Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Stockinger, S. A. (2018). Approaching effects of the economic crisis on university efficiency: a comparative study of Germany and Italy. Eurasian Business Review, 8(1), 37-54.
Kettunen, J., Reiman, T. and Wahlström, B., 2007. Safety management challenges and tensions in the European nuclear power industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(4), pp.424-444.
Bahr, N.J., 2014. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. CRC Press.
Marais, K., Saleh, J.H. and Leveson, N.G., 2006. Archetypes for organizational safety. Safety science, 44(7), pp.565-582.
Wiegmann, D.A. and Shappell, S.A., 2017. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Routledge.
Maurino, D.E., Reason, J., Johnston, N. and Lee, R.B., 2017. Beyond aviation human factors: Safety in high technology systems. Routledge.
Stolzer, A.J., 2017. Safety management systems in aviation. Routledge.
Dekker, S., 2017. The field guide to human error investigations. Routledge.
Helmreich, R.L. and Merritt, A.C., 2017. Culture at work in aviation and medicine: National, organizational and professional influences. Routledge.
Dekker, S., 2017. The field guide to understanding’human error’. CRC Press.
Newton, V., Greenberg, A. and See, J., 2017, July. Project Management Implications and Implementation Roadmap of Human Readiness Levels. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations (pp. 99-111). Springer, Cham.
Billings, C.E., 2018. Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. CRC Press.
Khan, F. and Hashemi, S.J., 2017. Introduction. In Methods in Chemical Process Safety (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Elsevier. Dismukes, R.K., Berman, B.A. and Loukopoulos, L., 2017. The limits of expertise: Rethinking pilot error and the causes of airline accidents. Routledge.
Sun, Z.Y., Zhou, J.L. and Gan, L.F., 2018. Safety assessment in oil drilling work system based on empirical study and Analytic Network Process. Safety Science, 105, pp.86-97.
Washington, A., Clothier, R. and Silva, J., 2018. Managing Uncertainty in the Unmanned Aircraft System Safety Performance Requirements Compliance Process. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 5(5).
Bowers, C.A., Oser, R.L., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A., 2018. 12 Team Performance in Automated Systems. Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, p.145.
Scerbo, M.W., 2018. Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In Automation and human performance (pp. 57-84). Routledge.
Puri, N. and Spevetz, A., 2018. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PATIENT SAFETY IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. Critical Care Secrets E-Book, p.71.
Jafari, L., Naderkhani, F. and Makis, V., 2018. Joint optimization of maintenance policy and inspection interval for a multi-unit series system using proportional hazards model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(1), pp.36-48.
Nesbitt, K., Rasiah, R., Levett-Jones, T. and Gilligan, C., 2018. Safe dispensing in community pharmacies: applying the software, hardware, environment and liveware (SHELL) model. Stroke, 13, p.57.
Dekker, S., 2017. The field guide to human error investigations. Routledge.
Stolzer, A.J., 2017. Safety mGill, G.K. and Shergill, G.S., 2004. Perceptions of safety management and safety culture in the aviation industry in New Zealand. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10(4), pp.231-237.anagement systems in aviation. Routledge
Wells, A.T., 2001. Commercial aviation safety. McGraw Hill Professional.
Hales, B.M. and Pronovost, P.J., 2006. The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvement. Journal of critical care, 21(3), pp.231-235.
Hudson, P., 2003. Applying the lessons of high risk industries to health care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 12(suppl 1), pp.i7-i12.
Thomas, E.J., Sherwood, G.D. and Helmreich, R.L., 2003. Lessons from aviation: teamwork to improve patient safety. Nursing Economics, 21(5), p.241.
Wiegmann, D.A., Zhang, H., Von Thaden, T.L., Sharma, G. and Gibbons, A.M., 2004. Safety culture: An integrative review. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14(2), pp.117-134.
Pizzi, L., Goldfarb, N.I. and Nash, D.B., 2001. Crew resource management and its applications in medicine. Making health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices, 44, pp.511-519.
Hetherington, C., Flin, R. and Mearns, K., 2006. Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of safety research, 37(4), pp.401-411.
