Academic Master

Education, English

Death Penalty Is Against Human Rights

The death penalty is rewarded to individuals who commit crimes of serious nature. But everyday people in different countries are executed for different types of crimes. Sometimes, these crimes are serious, or they can be minor, too. Different laws prevail in different countries about the death penalty. The death penalty punishes people where their lives are ended. People who are rewarded with the death penalty sometimes have to wait for years in prison for their time to come. They don’t know when they will be rewarded with the death penalty. Different laws prevail in different countries regarding the death penalty. Some countries reward the death penalty for crimes including terror or murder, while some countries execute people for acts that even shouldn’t be criminalized. Thus, the death penalty law is different for different countries.

The death penalty, in my view, is against human rights. Nobody has the right to take away anybody’s life except God. Crimes must be penalized, but not with death. Giving the death penalty gives the impression that there is no way of forgiveness or rectifying oneself. The death penalty not only violates human rights, but this act is inhumane, cruel, brutal and degrading. The death penalty must be banned. In some countries, death penalties are even rewarded to individuals under eighteen years old or to people who have a mental illness. This is inhumane. Individuals under eighteen years of age must be counselled and helped to get rid of their bad habits rather than just hanging them to death.

There are many reasons why the death penalty must be banned. The first reason is that the death penalty risks the lives of innocent people. In many countries, criminals belonging to wealthy families can easily blame poorer people for committing a crime. These wealthy people can turn laws in their favour. In this way, real criminals always find a way out, but innocent are executed. Another reason why the death penalty must be abolished is that there are several other options available that are better than the death penalty. For instance, counselling criminals and helping them adopt a healthy lifestyle and good habits will help criminals get rid of criminal behaviour. The death penalty is not the only way of abolishing sins; there are many other ways sins and criminal acts can be abolished.

The sad part of the justice system is that poor people of colour are punished much more severely than wealthy and white people. Crimes are most often associated with poor society or with people of colour. If a black is involved in a crime, he will be punished much more severely than a white person committing the same crime. In the same way, people of colour and poor people make up the highest proportion of those who are penalized with death.

There are many ways the death penalty is executed. Shooting, beheading, hanging, injection or electrification are some ways the death penalty is rewarded. All these acts are inhumane. The death penalty violates two very important principles of human rights. The first one is the right to live one’s own life, and the second one is the right to enjoy liberty and freedom. As the death penalty violates very basic human rights, it must be abolished immediately (Why the Death Penalty should be abolished, 2013).

The United States is among very few countries where the death penalty still prevails. About thirty countries in the year 1990 abolished the death penalty, but the remaining countries still applied this law. Countries like China and the United States reward a very high number of wealth penalties for those who are involved in serious criminal offences. Although strict laws and regulations need to be made if such serious penalties are to be rewarded, the truth is that the justice system is still weak in recognizing the right suspect. In America, about twelve per cent of the population is African American people. Unfortunately, about forty-two per cent of the prisoners in America are people of colour, and the death penalty and other such punishments become victims of racism. People of colour suffer from such penalties than white people (Six Reasons to Oppose the Death Penalty, n.d.).

There are cases where people charged with a similar crime are offered different penalties. A case shows that two men were involved in the murder. One of them was rewarded with the death penalty, and he was electrified. The second men were able to get some state evidence. As a result, he was able to escape the death penalty. This sort of discrimination affects the integrity of justice. If the death penalty had to exist, then it must be the same for all.

The death penalty also gives the media and press a chance to publicize some of the worst kinds of offenders. When the death penalty is offered, the media and press get a new story. They cover the matter to give it a sense of entertainment. For instance, last dinner, meeting with the family for the last time, last wish, and all such stories are created by the media to capture public attention. In my view, the justice system should be free from the media and the press. Publicizing an execution is making the matter much worse (Meehan, 1982).

Thus, there are many reasons why the death penalty must be abolished. It an inhumane act, it violates human rights, it becomes victim to racism, discrimination risks the lives of innocent people and media gets a chance to publish stories to grasp public attention for no particular reason. The death penalty is not the only way of abolishing a crime. There could be other ways through which societies could be made much more secure for people to live in. Thus I believe that death penalties must be banned.


Meehan, M. (1982, November 20). Ten reasons to oppose the death penalty. Retrieved from

Six Reasons to Oppose the Death Penalty. (n.d.). Retrieved from NO Death Penalty Website:

Why the Death Penalty should be abolished. (2013). Retrieved from International Commission Website:



Calculate Your Order

Standard price





Pop-up Message