Introduction
US Counter-Terrorism Policy has been one of the most controversial and often extensively debated policy. Critical analysis of the policy reveals that it has certain drawbacks and loopholes that need to be addressed immediately and efficiently to make the policy more effective and efficient. Otherwise several issues can surface including national security, social integrity and increase terrorism incidents or allegations.
Problem with US Counter Terrorism Policy
Not, one or the other the new 2011 US National Strategy for Counter terrorism, nor the as of late distributed counter-radicalization strategy give a model whereupon Federal, State and neighborhood law enforcement and regular person organization could successfully arrange what’s to come Us defense against terrorism.
Rationale
Currently, American is facing multiple challenges and issues in counter terrorism domain. The National Strategy for Counter terrorism, which was exhibited on 29 June 2011, endeavors to audit those tests in an extensive way. Upon the arrival of production, the US was energetically included in military operations especially in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, etc. Secretive counter terrorist operations run much further away from home.
The US military engagement in Afghanistan is currently the longest and costliest war. The resultant cost of America’s counter terrorism deliberations as far as US losses and fiscal consumption throughout the most recent 10 years has been limitless. The planet’s political and budgetary scene has been all in all characterized by America’s counterterrorism exertion. As the 2012 Us Presidential decision approaches, numerous Americans are currently asking how the US can withdraw from these abroad wars in which it is locked in.
The new National Counter terrorism Strategy tries to answer that address. It offers much that is natural from past strategies about debasing al-Qaeda’s proficiency abroad and working with international accomplices to accomplish triumph. It even heads off so far as to prescribe al-Qaeda is well on the way to rout. Nonetheless, it then plots the counter terrorist circumstance in nine separate theatres of operation over the planet. Those rundowns don’t prescribe that success or dominance against al-Qaeda, its associates and its sympathizers is impending. Unfortunately, al-Qaeda-identified terrorism against America and its interests, and the West all in all, will remain a risk for the near future.
The second main consideration that requires point by point attention is the planet’s rate of technological change. This is happening at the speediest rate in history and is having a sensational effect on both international relations and the danger of terrorism. Whilst governments can now control data in the ballpark of a subject’s close to home foundation, their travel histories and their accounts, the rate of technical change, the sheer volume of data, protection concerns, the expenditure of national IT anticipates and inter office turf wars all utmost a government’s adequacy when taking care of mass It data.
Contrast that and the force the Internet has now given a dissenter or terrorist. Interpersonal interaction by people has as of late expedited spontaneous upsets over the Middle East in the ‘Arab Spring’. Nonetheless, it stays to be seen if the foundation of new governments in the Middle East really decrease the risk of terrorism against European and western countries. The National Counter terrorism Strategy claims that the ‘Arab Spring’ is a sum vanquish for al-Qaeda. Sensibly, it is so unanticipated it is not possible make such a clearing claim. Just time will tell. The singular frustration that started the ‘Arab Spring’ might truth be told advance into yet more terrorism pointed at the West. This is unavoidably set to happen if the new administrations backed by the US end up being no preferable for their populaces over those that the prevalent uprisings supplanted.
In both nations al-Qaeda will clearly remain alarm to enlist an alternate era of frustrated Muslim adolescents to its ranks. The part of informal communication throughout the later revolts in the UK demonstrate how technological change can likewise be utilized by culprits and terrorists.
Conclusion
Critically evaluating the given conditions and loopholes of the US National Security and Counter Terrorism policy, it is evident that it has critical and severe inefficiencies and deficiencies that need to be considered immediately. Some of the most critical issues include its negligence over social, economic and technological perspectives of terrorism and social reforms.
