The Intricate World Of Language And Focused On Women’s Representation In The Pakistani TV Series Baaghi

Abstract

Using the case study of a Pakistani television drama series, Baaghi [rebel], based on the life story of Qandeel Baloch —the scandalous and contentious social media figure who defied traditional codes of gender conduct until she was murdered in an honor killing— this paper explores violence against women as it is inscribed via clearly visibilized objectification processes. This research, through Visual Critical Discourse Analysis (VCDA), investigated how visual and narrative elements in Baaghi play into the objectification of its female protagonist Fauzia Batool. The study finds that the visual semiotics in dramas such as male gaze, framing, lighting and symbolic use of colour are used to perpetuate traditional gender roles. It also confirms that the non-symbolic narrative of Baaghi continues to reinforce stereotype about ‘good’ and ‘bad’ women, depicting female status as inherently destabilizing alternately being seen good or evil —unchangeable. The drama touches on important social issues but falls into a patriarchal square hole, using Fauzia’s squeal to warn the Nadeem-like father. — Publicity photo Taken together, these results indicate that Baaghi may very well reflect and constitute cultural notions of gender in Pakistan; extenuating the dialogue on how women are represented in media. The paper ends by calling for more inclusive and just Pakistani representations of Pakistani women in the media.

Introduction

All human interaction is language-based. Language is an almost transcendent tool that enables humans to communicate ideas, emotions, and thoughts with unparalleled breadth and depth. Language has forms, from the threads of spoken words and narratives; the unwritten, silent rhyme dramatically recited through the language of signs unite cultures. This paper covered the intricate world of language and focused on women’s representation in the Pakistani TV series Baaghi. It should be noted that primordial language is geared towards explaining complex concepts, articulating feelings, and sharing facts. Language is an ordered system of signs, semiotics, symbols and rules, and grammar structures that activate the “complex” mechanism of meaning transfer. Linguist Ferdinand de Saussure argued that language is a system of semiotics. In the area of signs, any sign in language or language culture is composed of a signifier and a signified. The Saussure model emphasizes the interdependence of meanings within the linguocultural code. Noam Chomsky subsequently theorized generative grammar, elaborating that the human brain has universal grammatical rules. Russian linguist Mikhail Bakhtin insisted that language is dialogic, implying that meanings are renegotiated as a result of social action and cultural parameters. He was later influenced by Michel Foucault, who insinuated that language is integrated with power and knowledge structures. Objectification is the process of reducing someone to an object, denying them their personal identity and agency. It is a concept relevant to gender studies, media studies, and cultural criticism because it affects societal attitudes and gender power relationships. There are numerous media representations of objectification, which influence social expectations and prejudgments, thereby maintaining gender discrimination. This type of objectification must be eliminated because it influences the way women see themselves and society views females and gets accustomed to the same. From the mid-1960s up to the present, the Pakistani TV drama industry has been a key element in shaping the portrayal of women, reflecting and influencing societal attitudes. One of the nation’s largest media sectors and a leading voice for the Pakistani depiction of women has been TV drama series since the mid-1960s. The role of women in the Pakistani drama series is seen as a roadmap to the future of the nation and its feminists. On the one hand, the media can empower women to be more forceful translators of change, but it also reinforces male values by reducing female characteristics through the lenses of T., Rida, T., & Shanzay, M. S.2019. Women as femininity and sexuality, thereby shrinking the gender gap. The objectification of women is not a recent phenomenon; it has existed in the Pakistani and international media portrayal of women for decades. Representation of women in the media has a sexual effect as secondly active agents in society. Women are conditioned in a patriarchal society. Mainstream media’s representation of men and women together creates a perception. The depiction of men and women non-verbally creates androgyny through intersexuality and heterosexuality, considering mass communication a gender specialization, it clears a human destination to what is in mothers and what fathers..

Such dynamics are at play in the play — and life (or death) — of Qandeel Baloch, ruffling norms along with resistant impulses as she did. Its visual and textual tempos work nicely within the liminal space of an exploration into how sex, style, or spectacle may further reinforce various modalities of sexual objectification, all while queuing to some rather saucy modern women bucking convention. This article examines the case of Qandeel Baloch, an online sensation whose candid and sometimes controversial public persona made her both a celebrity as well as a figure of scandal in real life, illustrating how specific gendered representations are produced through media.

It is an example of how media (re)produces a specific set of semiotic strategies to give us its signifiers of women. The way you see Qandeel — through what the words, production design and explicit statements document or selectively elide; her outfits, body language and position within frame (literally) — forms an anchor to these creators in order to build their own version of who this character might have been. Stereotypes, on the other hand, want all men to lust after her even if they are feeling a sense that she is disrupting traditional gender roles and asking them to be more like everyone else. At the same time, according to the lens, she is extraordinary, in her physical self with no eyes for anything else — home life balance, career and such like— striving against attendencies imposed by society on what makes an average person. Further focusing on her body and defiance tells its own story, that to stand outside traditional femininity was how women could break through “Re-runs: star in the last of Marilyn Monroe Photographs.

Textual semiotics in Baaghi(2016) reveal this clear (and hidden, clearly!) aura of bias that not only sprays but carries itself across the line. Qandeel and her actions or history are articulated in terms rich with moral judgment. Adjectives like controversial, bold and provocative are loaded cultural terms whose modern takes defy cross-generational narratives for women. This is sexist, too rounded a term of abuse, but ‘jugly’ enough – worth reinterpreting for its complex loadings that set the value of Qandeel not quite in traditional femininity; made genderqueer similarly. Such language further separates the “good” women from those deemed “bad,” and helps to punish menopausal, or otherwise out-of-place females. That idea was that women were to be valued based on whether they fulfilled the roles assigned, reducing individual people with multiple facets of being into clean categories.

The same went for the way Qandeel Baloch has been portrayed on Baaghi — a testament to how powerful men and women are in their orientation when it comes to media representations of gender. While the male gaze has a long history of objectification, often turning women into sex symbols or domestic goddesses, an equally powerful feminist gaze (especially one with industry-wide intentions to subvert patriarchal norms) is just as likely to villainize and pigeonhole defining roles for female characters. Qandeel is a sexualized woman, but well so—not in another idiom of patriarchy, she also comes across as “a resistance” for some. However, such interpretations often render her as one-dimensional caricatures rather than a full range of human pigmentation.

Despite taking inspiration from a real-life person who went on to break certain societal norms, Baaghi is an exemplification of how the platform of movies cannot stay completely immune to being used as a tool for media representation. This film could either capitalize on Yol — for it to come true, as anything but a vessel or an undefined emblem in the type of nerd-girls struggle narrative, meanwhile another scriptships Kan swooping down from above. The act of mirroring people in this way can erase their specificity, turn the actual lives of human beings into types and signs for some broader cultural narrative, which might be very far from who those individuals were.

Dastan — “Baaghi” treats Baloch by reclaiming the agency that forward-thinking women earn and channel to craft their own destinies; instead it writes her existence within a patriarchal framework of misery, casting her as suffering victim rather than powerful agent. In an attempt to break down and identify some dynamics of this discourse, we critically analyze visual motifs in a few scenes from Baaghi. It does this through focusing on how the textual and visual spectacle of the drama works to objectify the protagonist (its woman leading player) and, in turn, what these representations imply for gender attitudes within Pakistani society.

The objectification or subjugation of women is often shown through the media, long informed by underlying gender stereotypes and societal norms. The way in which the media presents women has been kept under control since criticism against it was first made (Isanovic, 2006). When women are used as objects in the media, depictions of them being objectified rob them of their humanity and individuality. These depictions reinforce deeply patriarchal ideologies and gender disparity within the framework of traditionalizing Pakistani media. Shraddha Kapoor plays the female lead Baaghi, which is inspired by Qandeel Baloch and received both accolades as well as flak for its portrayal of Fauzia Batool. The number of women has been few to none in this language, and a comparison between descriptions (even the ones about Women) is most often compared with men who live quite successfully on collecting “the media”. Warps the role of women in society (Tuchman, 1979). Women are traditionally neglected by the mainstream media, and when they do receive coverage, it is generally of a sexual nature, depicting them as little more than objects that can be either bought or accepted because how closely will any woman truly examine herself to an ideal her mind flits away. In “Out of Focus”, Dickey, J. (2006), adverts are as good as depicting women as sex objects. Her body is positioned to entice the man looking at it. According to Steven Heller in his article “Sex Sells,” the ad is a libido booster. They present women as sex symbols in order to market their products, which is are wrong impression. Dodd et al. An investigation by Brookes and Turner (1989) illustrated a bias in the representation of women’s bodies relative to that of men, with body parts more apparent when photographing women but face regions being less occluded for male subjects. Women are often objectified in the print media and commercial ads across South Asia (especially Pakistan), catering to the masculine gaze. Twingo, 3.000 Jyes員了! These trends do not only apply to all humanity. These illustrations of capitalistic reminders, enforced from one generation to the next, further promote devaluing women’s respect and dignity in order for them to be salable commodities. The play, Baaghi on the other hand is based off of Qandeel Baloch’s life and gives us a critical lens in this regard.

Women’s magazines and print media situate them as subordinate, passive bodies to be available for sexual service(McRobbie, 1996). Nisar Khan (2010) claims that the media in Pakistan does objectification of women. We see print media portray women as sexual objects and helpless abuse victims. These ads, particularly those cunningly tucked away in show buzz pages, are the fashion grooming God to prod us on what things we need so as not to be left out of this whirlwind excitement (Wood 2005) Newspapers and magazines that sell images of women may classify this type of stereotype sexism (Goldman 1992). The worrying trend is that the objectification of women by the media has gone to the extent where some photos are making women less human (Bwewusa, 2008). Men are presented as well-dressed, confident-looking looking strong male figures; whereas women are shown in a glamorous way or traditional role (Syed 2006). In sum, capitalist ideology is presented in printed media where women are portrayed on display as a “tag” for the advertisement of products. As McRobbie (1996) points out, for example, one way of selling products is by using the female body as an ‘anchoring device’. So when women have their bodies objectified under this system, then to hell with Hegel and his dialectics, capitalist demands blood. Gender stereotyping in the media by objectifying women is also perpetuated when images of them are depicted in advertisements.

It generally pertains to the social construct around how society expects men and women to behave, embodying deeply ingrained cultural definitions of masculinity & femininity. These roles determine how men and women are supposed to behave, serving as a “blueprint” for structuring day-to-day life within a culture (Lindsey). The gender related behavior that an individual will ever exhibit is determined from their birth. These roles are kept in place through gender stereotypes, fixed ideas of what a male or female should be like and done that go back generations (Suter, 2006). Boys and girls are typically socialized to learn their expected roles early in life; males lean towards being competitively independent, while females tend to become nurturingly submissive (Ridgeway & Balkwell, 1997). Throughout our lives, this process of socialization helps construct gender roles and provides us with strict rules regarding what is considered reasonable behavior for each sex (Lynn 1996). As a result, boys and girls are socialized differently from each other… For example, this could further entrench traditional gender roles by stigmatizing activities or behaviours that fall outside of what society has come to expect — for instance if in addition to wearing skirts rather than pants on certain days at school (or vice versa), boys were also discouraged from dancing because they felt it was too “feminine.”

For example, in patriarchal setups, societies like Akhtun, these stereotypes and gender roles are reified by giving the power to menospheres from PEOs (Naz & Rehman, 2012). The patriarchal system of society awards greater power to men, perpetuating their superior position and restricting the roles for which women are suited. We see this play out, for example, in the pervasive deterrence of boys from engaging with female-coded activities that contribute to the continued reinforcement of a familiar structure where gender is male on top, followed by everything else. Gender socialization also has a significant effect on the differences within the family. This creates and enforces traditional gender binaries, establishing a framework of male and female roles which are hard to transgress.

The patriarchal milieu ingrains the representations and performance of gender roles on individuals, especially through education, and media functions too along this line, but in various facets of life, including work. One example is that most schools reinforce gender stereotypes by having different standards for boys vs. girls Recently we have forced boys to perform better in areas such as science, mathematics and sports… traditionally male activities like men are encouraged even at an early level whereas girls were/are steered towards disciplines that fit well with their perceived nurturing nature i.e., humanities/social sciences. This initial educational sorting affects later occupational choices and opportunities, typically screening women into lower-paid careers.

One of the main tools in reinforcing gender stereotypes is through the Media, where men are generally shown as breadwinners and women are depicted at home. Women often are depicted as homebodies, nurturers or in jobs that stress looks, while men find themselves to be heads of the household/team/breadwinners. And these representations all serve to reify an idea of inherent male-versus-female nature, and ongoing-service function within society; that men are a certain way because Men Are Like That — or rather: This Is What A Man Does. In addition, women are often portrayed in the media, much more than men, as a means to an end, as a beautiful image of how they should look rather than for any personal talent or good looks (Ali et al.

In the workplace, we all play a role in maintaining mainstream gender roles. Masculinity itself is often associated with power and decisive logic, rendering men the natural choice to lead. Contrastingly, women are often encouraged to be nurturing and covert sympathetic maternal or secretarial/junior officer roles. Such stereotypes not only obstruct women from advancing in careers and negatively impact wage parity, job segregation, as well as the underrepresentation of men and women within certain occupations, especially STEM.

The Effect Of Socialization On Gender Roles Is Huge And Starts Right From Birth. In fact, from the moment they are born, children are treated differently according to their gender​and an attitude adopted by family members, educators and other adults as well as peers and society in general. This can include dressing boys in blue, girls in pink; buying gender-specific toys or guiding children toward each other’s types of play. This notion of boys being destined for power while girls are caretakers bleeds into these little exercises — they amount to action cues in the brains or primers, which have a powerful impact on how children view themselves and their perceived roles. Men may be encouraged to grow up playing with construction sets or end-of-route competitive sports, enhancing leadership and engineering problem-solving skills. On the other hand, girls may be given dolls or playsets that simulate domestic labor (e.g., kitchen sets), which send a message about where their most important place is meant to lie- home and family.

These early experiences are only further compounded as children grow up within a box of societal expectations and cultural norms dictating what men and women should act like. This may be seen when parents tell their son that because he is a ‘boy’ it wouldn’t make sense for him to do X thing, or where BAME individuals begin to see themselves as others, which later develops into a condition following the thinking. Girls, on the other hand, will be deterred from sports and science areas that are historically male-dominated, which adds to women not being in their rightful places (Heldman 2021).

Such standards are additionally strengthened and established by a culture that offers more power, rights, and assets to men in the patriarchal social order of most societies, including those from Akhtun (Naz & Rehman, 2012). It can be seen in all forms of life, from household decision-making to who runs the world’s politics and economics. Men demand mention as primary breadwinners and site for decision makers, while women are made to feel part of the home family domain due to patriarchal norms. Not only does this distinction prevent professional and personal growth for women, but it also perpetuates the idea that men are fundamentally more competent to have power.

Gender roles, positioned by the media that are widespread throughout society. And it is full of gender stereotypes, reinforcing ideas about men and women in society: what kind of people they are supposed to be or become due only to their genitalia. So men are often represented in media as strong, tough guys- leaders and just/while women have been shown a emotional, soft/followers /dependent. By reproducing existing stereotypes, these portrayals also restrict the possible roles that people can assume gender-wise and, in so doing, reinforce a vicious cycle where quintessential masculinity is consistently reinforced.

These stereotypes have serious repercussions. They impact self-image, career decisions and changes, as well as relationships with others …and mental wellbeing. For instance, in some fields traditionally dominated by men, pursuing a career could have been hard for women due to the level of institutionalized biases or policies against them, such as discrimination in opportunities, manual and access limited chances merging with reluctant resources. These issues can lead to reduced self-esteem, heightened stress and diminished job satisfaction, which contributes to a lack of female representation in leadership roles as well as the economic participation gender gap.

In addition, traditional gender roles and stereotypes can also harm the welfare of men. Men who demonstrate behaviors not consistent with local ideals of masculinity, such as being emotionally expressive or involvement in a career within a caring profession, much like childcare, may face stigmatization, harassment and social barriers. The pressure to be able-bodied and conform to rigid gender norms has been linked with mental health problems like anxiety, depression or even suicidal thoughts, especially those who do not feel comfortable along the lines of traditional masculinity (Tuchman, 1978).

This belief in traditional sex roles and gender stereotypes is also observed among policymakers and governance. In addition to failing to reduce these disparities, policies that do not take gender equity into account when they are developed and implemented tend only to perpetuate them. Policies like those around maternity leave (without a similar corresponding provision for paternity) further enshrine the idea that care is fundamentally and predominantly female. Similarly, social protection measures that are not gender responsive, such as childcare or reproductive health services, leave women further behind.

Cultural and religious norms also play a major role in gender socialization. Culture and religious beliefs significantly shape the norms of being an appropriate man or woman in many societies, like the Akhtun society. These norms are generally grounded in patriarchal interpretations of religious texts or cultural traditions that stipulate roles for men and women, respectively. In some cultures, for example, women are not only supposed to dress modestly, but they must also stay in the home and put their roles as wives and mothers above personal aspirations or careers. Of course, these expectations also reduce the autonomy and freedoms women may have to make decisions about their lives.

Socialization processes that teach us to embrace traditional gender roles play a part in systemic discrimination and inequality. For example, if a society places more value on male education and employment, women may have less access or be omitted from it. This hampers the economic independence of women, and continues rather than breaks cycles of poverty and dependence. In addition, the underrepresentation of women in decision-making positions at every level, from local governance to national politics, results in only rarely are policy considerations responsive and attentive to broader interests (Tuchman 1978).

To sum up, gender is a multifaceted sociological concept where men and women are rated on how they should act according to our generally followed rules of culture or society. These roles are not only established through various socialization processes from early childhood and adolescence, but they are also enforced throughout one’s life by family institutions like the home environment; education (formal or informal) media messages in newspapers/magazines & TV programs/the internet etc; workplace regulations among others vestigias of societal value norms. On one hand, such identities can be conceptualized as a convenient means to socially sort people; on another hand, they also represent the repression of each individual and lead to inequality. Challenging and also understanding these roles is fundamental to achieving a more just society where people are assessed for who they actually are rather than which sex they were born. The root causes of gender stereotypes must be targeted if we are to achieve equality between the genders and a society that is diverse, equal and inclusive.

Semiological codes and the objectification of women in video expectations

The whole civilization within the human community is built on a semiotic code, which is not just anything like a tool for interaction. Its complex lattice of symbols and patterns has many functions, but a few are related to modeling the universe from our experiences, enabling social transactions with others like us (retail in particular), and pushing on how knowledge spreads across minds. It is a vehicle for our ideas and thoughts (Pinker, 2018). It allows us to interpret data, complex mental, and even solve problems. Semiotic code is the bedrock of human communication to underpin our transactions, build relationships with each other, share experiences collaborate (Crystal, 2011)

Objectifying women — depriving them of selfness and reasonableness, treating them as if they are only bodies to be desired or used in order to serve (see? Feminine objectification) is the crime truly at hand. This is still a core concept of gender studies because it has had such an impact on society’s attitudes and dynamic ideas surrounding sex. Media in many ways dehumanizes and perpetuates gender inequalities & biases — objectification of men is also prevalent ~ Female objectification is a matter of paramount importance since it contributes to cultural standards, perpetuates discrimination between sexes, and the way women perceive their own self-identity.

Semiotic Symbols Signs and symbols within cultural representation are semiotic codes, which can provide meaning or signify something. It combines the textual, visual and audio elements of a message together to create unity. Visual semiotics play a key role as well in the objectification of women, such as colour, gaze and frame. The way women are framed visually (or where they seem to be looking) can also provide objectifying perspectives,

Baaghi: A reflection of female objectification and gender stereotyping

The results on gender stereotyping and cultural reinforcement of gender roles provide us with a framework for looking at the objectification of women in Baaghi.

At the same time, a study of how these stereotypes get staged in drama and if they are challenged or further concretised can be situated with regard to gender roles deeply entrenched within Pakistani society. Throughout the history of media, women have been objectified in ways that are demeaning and work to reinforce gender stereotypes. These representations should be critically analyzed as media still significantly influence societal norms. The biography of Qandeel Baloch in Pakistani drama serial Baaghi makes a great case study to analyse how visual and verbal semiotic codes represent and perpetuate the objectification of women. This research paper aims to explore the objectified female heroin Fauzia Batool of Baaghi through visual semiotics, and what society takes from it when it comes down redefining gender roles.

How media representation affects public perception and attitude towards gender is of significant importance. How men and women are represented in various types of media — television, film, advertising, and digital delivery systems — plays a large role en masse on how gender roles and identities are recognized/constructed by an audience. Media is both a mirror of society (showing norms, values and ideologies in our culture) and the window to another group who may be different from us. But it is also a weapon that helps in building and perpetuating many of these norms, often pushing stereotypes about what individuals can (and cannot) do or are expected to be when considering their gender.

On an open scale, the media representation of gender is usually hobbled with patriarchal norms that regard males as strong and dominant-rational, while females are exposed to be passive- passive-passive-passive-emotional-subordinated. The portrayal of gender as binary erases the various intersex experiences, and also crucially reifies what it means to be male or female. These representations play a role in the social construction of gender, which stipulates that people are expected to behave according to certain norms based on their own identity. For instance, it is very common to see men as CEOs of companies or politicians, central heroes… this can obviously confirm our traditional idea that a man is about power and strength. Concurrently, the roles women are expected to fulfill, be that of a nurturer or as an objectification of male desire, only prove that masculinity is equal parts cultivation and animosity.

These are a powerful reference, especially since media power is in the lives of practically every day. And over the years, since a very young age, our minds have been conditioned by what the media throws at us on understanding gender roles. For instance, children’s television programs and toys enforce traditional gender roles like girls being encouraged to play with dolls or participate in nurturing activities versus boys playing with action figures & competitive sports. The young age at which we absorb these gendered messages suggests why so many people end up seeing women as less capable or worthy than men; something that can impact career choices, interpersonal relationships, and the type of person you think can be president.

Especially when we consider the degree to which many societies are influenced by TV dramas, what popular television shows tell us about gender so clearly relates back to societal norms. South Asian media, including Pakistani television dramas, are often very gendered and depict women as dutiful daughters, wives or mothers whose main responsibilities in life involve taking care of the house and family. Women, on the other hand, are typically shown as homemakers, while men make the money and decisions, all of which reinforces a patriarchal power structure over both the public and private sectors.

The impact of the media in upholding gender stereotypes is real. These depictions only serve to further the marginalization and objectification of women by suggesting that a woman is not valuable unless she looks good, or can appeal in some way to those traditional gender roles. This is especially visible in how women are often stereotyped into vulnerable, weak and requiring maintenance (or serviced by men so as to be of use) or objects entirely for male pleasure. By portraying the female victim image, it limits the extent of female agency and helps to maintain gender-based discrimination (Lynn, 1996).

However, the media also has the potential to challenge and subvert these traditional gender roles. Progressive representations that depict women in positions of power, independence, and complexity can serve as a counter-narrative to the dominant patriarchal discourse. For example, the rise of female-led television series and films that portray women as complex, multi-dimensional characters—capable of making their own decisions, pursuing careers, and leading lives independent of male influence—offers an alternative to the traditional portrayals of women in media. These representations can inspire real-life changes in attitudes and behaviors, as audiences begin to see women as capable and autonomous individuals.

In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need for more diverse and equitable representations of gender in media. Feminist media studies have played a significant role in critiquing the ways in which media perpetuates gender stereotypes and advocating for more inclusive portrayals. These studies emphasize the importance of representing women not just as objects of male desire, but as active subjects with their own narratives, goals, and identities. This shift is reflected in the increasing presence of strong, independent female characters in both Western and South Asian media, although progress is often slow and inconsistent.

Pakistani television dramas, while often reflecting traditional societal norms, have also begun to explore more nuanced representations of gender. Dramas like Udaari and Cheekh have tackled issues such as sexual violence, women’s rights, and the importance of female agency, challenging the traditional roles assigned to women in Pakistani society. These dramas, by presenting women as complex characters capable of overcoming adversity and fighting for justice, offer a powerful critique of the patriarchal structures that dominate both media and society.

Despite these positive developments, the representation of gender in Pakistani media remains a contested space, where traditional and progressive narratives often collide. On one hand, there is a growing awareness of the need to challenge patriarchal norms and present more diverse and empowering portrayals of women. On the other hand, deeply entrenched cultural values and the commercial pressures of the media industry often result in the continued perpetuation of gender stereotypes (Lindsey, 2010)..

The drama Baghi, based on the life of Qandeel Baloch, is a case in point. While the drama attempts to portray the struggles of a woman who defied societal norms, it also grapples with the challenges of representing her in a way that neither objectifies nor vilifies her. The visual representation of Qandeel (Fauzia Batool) in the drama reflects the tension between these two imperatives: to tell her story honestly while avoiding the pitfalls of sensationalism and objectification. The way her character is portrayed visually—through the use of camera angles, lighting, and costume—offers a rich site for analysis of how media representations can both challenge and reinforce gender norms.

In conclusion, the representation of gender in media is a powerful force in shaping societal perceptions and attitudes. While media has the potential to reinforce traditional gender roles and perpetuate stereotypes, it also holds the power to challenge and subvert these norms, offering alternative narratives that promote gender equality and empowerment. In the context of Pakistani television dramas, the portrayal of female characters is particularly significant, as it reflects broader cultural values and has a profound impact on public opinion. As media continues to evolve, the ongoing critique and analysis of gender representation remain crucial for advancing a more equitable and inclusive society. The analysis of dramas like Baghi through the lens of Visual Critical Discourse Analysis provides valuable insights into the ways in which media can both challenge and reinforce societal norms regarding gender, offering a deeper understanding of the role of media in the construction of gender identities.

Female Objectification in Media

Female objectification in media refers to the portrayal of women as mere objects of male desire, reducing their worth to their physical appearance or sexual appeal rather than recognizing them as full, complex individuals with their own thoughts, feelings, and agency. This phenomenon is pervasive across various forms of media, including television, film, advertising, music videos, and even news media. The objectification of women not only reinforces harmful stereotypes but also contributes to a culture that normalizes gender-based discrimination and violence.

This is because the objectification of women has historically been entrenched in patriarchal attitudes, which see women only as vessels for men. It is imagined in a way that women are represented to be either passive, submissive or for the pleasure/service of male characters or audiences. The most obvious example of such bias is the “male gaze”, a term coined by feminist film theorist Laura Mulvey when analyzing visual storytelling in Hollywood filmmaking. It is an objectifying gaze, which makes women to be objects of voyeuristic pleasure for both the male characters within the film and by extension, its assumed audience — that presumed “man in a darkened room”, marginalizing of female perspective reducing women into mere spectacle: beautiful or desired (Lindsey, 2010)..

Those characterizations are more damaging. If women are constantly depicted as objects in the media, it is not an absurd idea to say that their worth will be perceived based on how good-looking and sexually available they may or may not be. Not only how men see women and the way they behave toward them, but it is also reflected in patterns of behavior within gender discrimination. These media messages are internalized by girls and women and result in problems of body dissatisfaction, low self-esteem, and growing up with unrealistic beauty standards. Focusing on looks can cause mental issues, like eating disorders and depression, as women strive to live up to unrealistic expectations of how they should look.

That objectification of women is very prevalent, especially in advertising. A popular method in which female bodies are used to commercialize products, from cars and food brands or cosmetics using their sexuality, is through sexualized imagery. Ads often use women as decorations or in sexy clothes and postures, focusing on parts of their bodies rather than any traits. This form of objectification functions very much like a slave log, reducing the female body to nothing but an instrument through which shit can be sold while not respecting women as individual entities with their own desires and dreams. The takeaway: Women are nothing but attractive, men-pleasing accessories — and that cycles back to the notion of women as objects who exist purely for the male gaze.

Another major contributor to the objectification of women is music videos. In numerous commercial music videos, women are frequently reduced to hyper-sexual dance partners dressed in barely discernible outfits. These images perpetuate the view that women are merely objects of sexual pleasure and that their main function is to be attractive in men’s eyes. Beyond representation, women continue to be objectified in song lyrics that depict them as nothing more than sexualized bodies and a myriad of exploitable orifices.

Yet another driver of female objectification is the movie industry. Typically, in popular films, women are usually two-dimensional characters whose existence seems only to benefit the growth and trials of a male hero. Many times, even in movies that are labeled as female-centered films, due to the manner in which they depict women (spending ample time on cashmere sweaters and frothy lattes but little showing of brains or muscle), we could argue differently still. In classic noir films, women often fill the role of a “femme fatale,” someone who spins an enticing sexual trap for men that is fatal in some way to the victim there-in reinforcing ideals about feminine power as rooted solely in her ability to manipulate with the use of sexuality (Bwewusa, 2008)..

TV, and sub-genres such as soaps or reality TV, too, reinforce objectification of women to a great extent. These genres have typically depicted female characters as cunning, superficial and fixated on their lives in relation to men. Reality shows have some of the worst offenders in their ranks, and female contestants seem to go from one show to the next, being portrayed not as accomplished women but rather examples that fulfill harmful stereotypes; think drama queens who start catfights, etc. Portraying women this way not only perpetuates harmful cliches about womankind, but it simplifies them as people too; transforming these individuals into one-dimensional caricatures of femininity to be defined by their bodies and penchant for sentimentality.

Even the news media, meant to be factual in nature, tends to objectify women. Female journalists and news anchors are frequently scrutinized for how they look in a manner not faced by their male peers. In the news business, women are often required to uphold beauty trends or else forfeit credibility if they stray too far from familiar models of attractiveness. This emphasis on looks above all else contributes to the objectification of women by diminishing their professional progress and experience as a second fiddle to how they look.

When women are objectified, the message being repeated again and again is that they are worth less by virtue of catering to a male standard of value (chiefly beauty/attractiveness) rather than defining their own terms for what has merit. Not only does this reaffirm gender inequality, but it feeds into a narrative culture that breeds and abets violence against women. When women are objectified unrelentingly, society begins to see them as so different from other humans that it becomes easier for some individuals and groups to dismiss the worthiness of a woman’s existence all; they become subhuman-objects. This is when many will start trying to separate themselves even further (humans vs objects) by justifying uncivilized behavior such as harassment intentions based on assaults or attacking each other with weapons against fellow “sub-human” beings: in short, more over-spiritual barbarism among ever-dividing false idols & icons instead fostering true human connection. (Bwewusa, 2008)…

Despite pushing back against these depictions, there is still a long way to go before half of the population is correctly represented as complete people deserving of respect and equal treatment. Only if the industry continues to be scrutinized, pushed and represented in an inclusive way will a media landscape emerge where women are appreciated for who they are, not just how they look (Bwewusa, 2008)..

Pakistani TV Dramas Sum-up

Pakistani television dramas have a reputation for their form of story-driven, deep emotional annealing and societal issues that very well represent the culture. These evergreen dramas have been an integral part of Pakistani pop culture since the 1960s, serving as entertainment and a mirror to the societal norms, values, and challenges of what their nation is undergoing. Pakistani dramas, over the years, have grown in terms of the content and production quality being broadcast on TV; however, there was a time when the Pakistani drama industry consisted of some stagnancy, but even that phase never decreased its viewership.

A dominant trend in the early years of Pakistani television (in particular during the 1960s and into the mid-1970s) was such drama serial programs that were directed towards a domestic market’s need to see melodrama, with them often focusing on domestication issues.AajaibKhana leads the prototype for this specific genre. The dramas of PTV from the 1970s (Waris, Koah e Yaqeen and Uncle Urfi) came to be an important cultural phenomenon, drawing over a hundred million viewers across the Arab world while Bollywood films were widely available. Neele Parbat was a talk show featuring classics like Waris (another Pakistani period drama), Sona Chandi; Mohabat subh ka sitara hai; Khaali Hath etc., these characterizations being iconic for Pakistan’s socio-cultural lexicon to date primarily continuing family solidarity issues affecting every one inside their daily challenges the normal life from any part all around this region. The stories in these dramas were complex and layered, the characters well developed and conflicted with themselves. The golden age of Pakistani dramas belonged to the programmes produced by state-run Pakistan Television Corporation (PTV), which aired several scripts that echoed with current socio-political environment in those days.

Dramas began with the magical touch of writing, where Pakistani dramas used to talk about new, interesting social issues like feudalism, poverty and women’s status in society when political regimes started coming into power. And in the time of 1980s and ‘90s, there was a gradual drift in themes — for example, dramas like Tanhaiyaan (aired in 1985) and Dhoop Kinarey, aired a few years later, had more open traditions tinged with contemporary thought around them. While these were entertaining to watch, they are also very educational, as they covered various social norms and the current trends in society that still gave their viewers topics for discussion. There were also some soaps which saw female leads who weren’t the standard small-screen women of old.

The beginning of the new millennium gave birth to fresh dramas along with an increasing number of television channels in Pakistan. These were the days when stories started getting a little bit different, and we saw more dramas that weren’t shy about touching on some of those controversial or taboo subjects. Issues such as domestic violence, child marriage and sexual abuse were spoken of more in the open now, along with Meri Zaat Zarra-e-Benishan (2009) and Humsafar (2011), two serials that not only followed international norms much before mining posed a serious concern within the commercial but also were big successes here! And the success of those shows pointed to a fact that was becoming clear for modern television, which had started out as an often-edgy medium meant in part (besides entertaining) to register and reflect social change — they could make society too.

Girls in Pakistani dramas are loved because they have strong female leads, and at the same time, girls in Pakistan don’t take ownership of their own rights. Matthew, so if some are praised for showing the burdens and empowerment of women, even more have been slammed as they seem to reinforce sexist beliefs and portray women suffering in a positive light. A typical one is if Female characters in many a drama are always seen praying incessantly for long sufferings and pitiless travail during the time that they took to wade through their torment. No, really, NONE of US ARE DOOMED TO CONTINUE ALONG THIS FILMSTRIP NARRATIVE WITH NO BALANCE because the plot has meaning— but most everyone else is doomed (as women) to read this sick movie narrative not typecast better by society.

One other signature of Pakistani Dramas is that all their holy sagas revolve around religion and tradition. Dramas that explore the clash between old ways and new, with characters trying to fulfill their cultural heritage during a time of dramatic social change. She is forced to forge her identity from the other conflicted selves in that bleak homestead, and in Shehr-e-Zaat (2012), this has been done through a spiritual journey of its main character, highlighting how faith intertwines with modern eras’ confusion-ridden Pakistan.

In recent years, Pakistani television dramas have become popular and well-known in India, the Middle East, along with a wide range of Europe & North America, where there is a large category from South Asia who have migrated. It reached millions of worldwide viewers With over 344 million combined streams in just two weeks, the views went global by virtue of streaming availability which meant that where ever you were watching from anywhere around the world —Iceland to Uganda to Korea— it was not displaced but widespread streamed dramas and easy access because no longer bound (or limited) like those traditional geographical territories. The same global presence of Pakistani dramas has also brought to the forefront a discussion on their shared cultural heritage with South Asia, as well as the possibilities for cross-border entertainment engagement.

But it has not been an easy ride for Pakistani TV dramas despite this success. One of the biggest complaints about the industry is that Philippine teleseryes, as they are called in the Filipino language, rely too heavily on mostly-similar storylines and often melodramatic content with very little innovation between them. In addition, despite the change in course and recede of themes towards a less patriarchal display of women still many shows maintain to dwell upon marriage/ dowry/ domesticity. Also, the rise of commercialization in Pakistani drama has raised worry about how much quality remains intact for content when many critiques conclude that Pakistani drama now focus on ratings and profitability before art.

But the industry is changing; fresh voices and interpolations are being added to replace those paved pathways. Independent production has grown and digital media has gradually become a more important platform, enabling some diversity & experimentation… Shows like Udaari (2016) that raised important questions about child sexual abuse and Cheekh (2019), which was the journey of a victimised woman in search for justice, are examples of this trend. These dramas, while entertaining are designed to make the viewer think and even do something themselves so they show TV as a medium for social change.

Introduction to Baghi

Baghi (English: Rebel) was a Pakistani biographical television drama serial that premiered on Urdu1 27 September 2017 based on life of social media sensationand national celebrity girl Qandeel Baloch who is famous for her controversies she got through facebook and twitter. Pakistani media called her the country’s Kim Kardashian when she was alive, both for her online posts and colorful private life. Her life, and the tragic end of it in an ‘honor killing’ by her brother in 2016 unleashed a huge debate on women’s rights, freedom of expression and how social media challenges traditional societal norms.

Baghi was developed specifically to dive deep into the life of Qandeel, looking at what brought her popularity both in social media and real world inexplicably lost lives under veils of shame threatening any women attempting liberation. Baghi, which is Urdu for “rebel”, hints at a story about women who do not comply with society’s norms and wage wars of their own to find themselves in the male-centric world. It was written by Shazia Khan, both directed and produced by Fahad Mustafa and Dr. Ali Kazmi under Big Bang Entertainment; the latter also served as an actor in the series while Kashif Nisar dually played a director when one of Rind’s episodes fell throughráival boycotts my scripts Versatile Pakistani actress Saba Qamar played the main lead of Fauzia/Qandeel, giving a strong and nuanced performance Kruger (1997),.

Baghi starts off with Fauzia in a small village where both the constraints of poverty and conservative family norms mean she faces certain limitations around what is possible for women growing up here today. The drama unfolds of her marriage to an abusive husband, escaping this man and then travelling to the city in hope for a good life. In her transition into Qandeel Baloch, the drama delves in these juxtapositions of a dual life: The persona she built up online and the trials away from home. In the story Baghi touches issues related to gender inequality, women getting oppressed and much more harsh realities that people have faced while trying not follow societal norms.

Another important issue brought forward in Baghi is the obsession with honour keeping that hes been suffocating women over ages and centuries. The hypocrisy of a society that would condemn women to adhere rigorously to traditional codes while giving men leeway is laid bare. She denied to follow these taboos, and her bold social media postings exposed her a source of both reverence and infamy. Baghi captures the contradictions in Qandeel; she was a victim, sure, but also a survivor: someone who used social media — arguably her only weapon as an uneducated small-town girl with few choices living in Pakistan’s patriarchal society at the time — to literally create space and place for herself.

The drama also deals with the role of media in moulding public opinion. Qandeel qua Qandeel achieved fame thanks to the media that made a spectacle of covering her, cleaving both profit and confirmation from them. He criticizes the media for promoting objectification and vilification of women who do not conform with traditional norms — ‘otherness’ yet also recognizes its potential to function as both a medium of self-expression, as well that can lead to or resist change in wider society. This is a complicated rendering of Qandeel and her dealings with the media, whereby she exploited it as much as it did her — an exchange that forms part of how we make ourselves visible to gain autonomy.

The drama became an instant hit due to its strong story telling and character of a woman that emerged as the face for both struggle and tragedy in Pakistan. Saba Qamar was specifically lauded for her on-point performance as she embodied the vulnerability, chaos and sharp contradictions that were part of who ‘Qandeel’ really. The incident led to global debate about women’s rights, so-called “honour killings” and the role of social media in questioning unwritten rules, garnering international headlines making it one of last year´s most talked-about serials.

Nonetheless, Baghi received its share of criticism which was mostly from those who believed the play either sensationalized Qandeel Baloch or did not explore her character further. Critics have said the drama failed to challenge entrenched patriarchal structures that helped lead Qandeel to her fate, and instead sensationalised aspects of a tragic life. Harms not withstanding, Baghi continues to be significant for its larger commentary on the media-gender-society triad in Pakistan.

To conclude, Baghi is not just a biographical drama but it also reflects the common problems faced by Pakistani women and criticizes on how societal norms gave birth to gender discrimination. The drama, by representing the life of Qandeel Baloch, is asking viewers to start looking at thinking differently about what they assume women should act like and getting us all a little empathy in there for a community that can only think in black or white. In Pakistan, Baghi makes an important addition to the gender-mainstreaming debate in media and social justice.

Review Literature

Female objectification in the media is a phenomenon that has been fully entrenched, thereby shaping cultural understandings of normalized behavior towards women and individual attitudes. The objectification of women is about seeing them primarily in terms of what might arouse heterosexual men and, therefore, stripping away any inherent value that a woman has as a human being with feelings & thoughts. What we also need to devour is the breath of women and their uteri (we are after all such big consumers) Women’s objectification continues in TV (Lindsey, 2010).,

Indeed, historically the portrayal of objects has been developed by written males to satisfy their needs as men. In this way, we can see how media representations have contributed to the portrayal of women as objects — constructs reduced solely for male sexual and service functions in popular cultures that marry othering post-colonial structures. This is an idea that has roots in visual and literary traditions old — a motif of the muse, nymph or siren all sold with beauty as key to their message. The male gaze, a term coined by feminist film theorist Laura Mulvey, reveals how media and visual narratives are often made with the Fictive theory of them being watched — where women become objects sexually shown off for men to enjoy. A gaze that is not confined to theatres but rather spans multiple media, reinforcing the idea of women as inherently valuable when they’re visually appealing to men.

The objectification of women as sex objects is not a passive process, it has been well-documented by media researchers to be an active strategy used in the industry to garner and keep viewers. For example, women’s bodies are often sexualized in advertising to help sell everything from cars and food, as well as beauty products. Advertisements frequently show women in suggestive poses, wearing seductive clothing and arranged to accentuate their… physical assets — at the expense of their personhood or competence. This objectification type commodifies the body of a woman and turn it into an instrument for marketing and profit instead to see women as human being. The images reinforce the idea that a woman is most valuable because she looks the best; her body becomes an effective selling point for keeping otherwise uninterested consumers coming back to buy on the ads. In Sanjay Mishra Vs DCS Television, the Defendant was selling Set Top Boxes that were pre-loaded to pick up various television broadcasts (including many from Sky TV), and stream them over the internet.

Media and Female Objectification, A Damning Year It also sends a loud and clear public message about their devaluation in society… that they are nothing more than tits, assholes and walking catering menus. Such message has a direct impact on the perception and behavior of men towards women, further reiterating sexist attitudes that degrades woman. Meanwhile, it affects the self-perception of women falling victim to problems like body dissatisfaction, low self-esteem and eventually internalizing toxic beauty norms. Research has shown that exposure to objectified media portrayals contributes to women’s negative psychological outcomes, such as anxiety, depression and eating disorders because these depictions create unrealistic expectations about appearance that are largely unattainable. For girls, the effect can be even worse: Girls are taught from a very young age to derive their self-worth based entirely on how they look which deepens these scars and manifests into identity deformation (Lynn, 1996)..

Additionally, this type of media results in detrimental stereotypes against women and the kinds of activities they can participate in. Media narratives have the power to solidify traditional gender roles that prescribe women into narrow categories, such as domestic sphere or dependent figures while marginalizing their potential in other areas through making them more prevalent on images than they are noticed and not heard. The example case is how women are more often then men showed as house-wives, care-takes or a romantic interest while man just a leader who makes decision and creator of the change. Such representations confine the reality of what can pass for a woman’s permissible conduct or dream hamper their chances to grow as an individual and at work. Media portrayals that continue to rely on overarching stereotypes only reinforces an imbalance in perception and ultimately, misrepresents the wheels of progress when lost female talent has so much to contribute (Ridgeway & Balkwell, 1997)..

Media-driven objectification has societal-level effects: it affects not only how individuals think or behave, but also the norms and policies that a society adopts. So, when the media continually sexualizes women, it reinforces attitudes that condone or normalize gender-based violence and harassment – essentially suggesting this is an acceptable way to behave. Objectifying the female half of humanity on account of their physical and biological attributes destroys the essence, they become less human in his eyes, then it is easier to manipulate them for purposes that are not at all College. In turn, policies and practices that do not effectively deal with gender inequality mirror the normalization of objectification. Workplace discrimination, pay unfairness and all the marginalization of women are rooted in systematic values that media keeps promoting. This means media not only mirrors current power structures, but plays an active role in constructing and maintaining them McRobbie (1996),.

Although this is a worldwide issue of the objectification of women in media, what it means and how it’s done varies within different cultural contexts. Media playout, Pakistani television dramas in particular seems to focus on women characters quite often idealizing them with traditional values and norms only. Women are often represented as devoted daughters, wives or mothers and that their major duties lay in the home with family. This representation perpetuates patriarchal ideals of measuring a woman through her familial duties. However, media narratives that diverge from these norms not only are met with backlash but also can easily be repackaged in a way to fall back on the very stereotypes they claim to dismantle. This means that female characters who do not conform to traditional standards can be represented as evil or marginalized from the rest of society, sending a message on what is and is not socially appropriate for women.

While female objectification in the media is so common, there has been an increasing acknowledgment of its necessity for change. Feminist media scholarship has been instrumental in investigating how the traditional gender schemas of different cultures are reproduced by sexist representations within mass communication. This is causing a slower change in the overall representation of women as more nuanced and less restricted roles being introduced. Today, movies and television programming are beginning to focus on more than just women playing traditional female roles — i.e. wife/mother/daughter/sister/grandmother/girlfriend/fiancée; one-dimensionally nurturing/passionate femme fatale/vamp/ditz/perfect mistress/filter-freak friend/jock-chick trumpet or some other stereotype passive-aggressive cretin designed by men pendejos (unicorns). These representations confront the patriarchal discourse and counter-climactic stories of gender equality is power (Lindsey, 2010)..

But the journey to achieve more equitable media representation is long and riddled with detours, many driven by commercial imperatives or rooted in age-old cultural norms. Because the media producers and those that they hire to write shows continue to be concerned about potentially alienating their audience, many are too afraid to go where no one has gone before (pun intended) with traditional gender roles. In addition, the global media market is increasingly concentrated in a few mega-corporations that still prioritize profit before social responsibility, making it almost impossible to ensure structural transformations. However, it is still important to criticize the objectification of women and try to move towards more balanced representations for progress on gender equality.

Ultimately, the sexual objectification of women in media is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences for gender parity and social justice. Again, It simply reflects deep-seated social prejudices — which, not coincidentally, is precisely what this phenomenon does as well the gendered messages that underlie them. Eventhough the media continue to act as a reflection and levying abuses making system consequently, creating or reflecting social norms then many potential movements can be created that oppose objectifying forms where women are taken into account sexual objects. Media — showing women as they truly are, rather than through the glorified lens of beauty that holds them back from playing out their potential — has to be an agent for social change: a proponent in our pursuit towards an open and inclusive society where not just men but also every woman can thrive.

Gender Analysis in the Media Objectification—Frameworks

Similarly, holding dozens of tentacles that reach to all corners of the lives of those under its boot-heel like a wrathful cephalopod opening up lady-legs in an alleyway on Chicago’s North Side until civilization is done spending everyone talking about how they’re godless. As feminist analysis weaves through this rape culture and commodity fetishism it does not forget thanatebiosis with magic threads made from labia, nostril hair or Quinn Martin Productions circa 1972. It lays emphasis on feminist perspective, notion of male gaze (cheque Trent) and analyses the visual grammar other frameworks that it implies to understand how media objectification works as well as provide an insight into what kind of social norms nurture such behaviours and delineates in detail about its consequences at individual level Notable works within these theoretical framework includes the Feminist Theory,theory Male Gaze,CDA are studies based off Visual Grammar by Theo van Leeuwen & Gunther Kress. Together, the frameworks suggest a new way of thinking about how women are depicted in media and even broader implications in society (socially, politically and culturally).

Key to this restored view on media objectification is a feminist theory approach which situates the pervasive impact of dominant forms from culture it teaches us ( Leonard, 2003 ) and brings back our attention to gender inequality as deeply rooted not only in cultural/social practices but also-institutional ones—e.g., power mediated by organizations with transformative powers—to that score. Feminist Theory questions the male-oriented media production and content that locuses on story-telling style of masculinity narrative supporting to achieve hegemony as at work. Media scholars, e.g. (Mulvey 1975), and especially feminist media critics have posited that the camera itself is constructed as a “masculine gaze” which orders all filmic texts—most acutely movies and advertisements—as fulfilling male power over women wishing to look at sexuality in patriarchal societies. It is what has been disgustingly labeled the ‘male gaze’ and it reduces women to zombie-eyed consumers waiting on products not capable of having their own narratives or autonomy. Feminist Theory, therefore supports altering or subverting these cultural representations by examining power dynamics in narratives and working to make images more diverseable (Bwewusa).

Understanding Female Objectification in Media: An Introduction to the Male Gaze The concept of The Male Gaze, developed by Laura Mulvey (in her seminal essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” 1975), is at the heart of understanding female objectification in media. Mulvey claims that Hollywood cinema pits women as an object of desire for the heterosexual male, ultimately perpetuating patriarchal ideologies and power structures. The male gaze appears in the camera as a man, whether it be what can be seen or who is looking through, and more generally by how men act within the story (active) opposed to women( passive). By examining the male gaze, Mulvey illustrates how visual media frequently objectifies women as little more than a visually pleasing image existing for the enjoyment of (male) spectators. It is especially good for dissecting the ways in which visual components like camera angles, lighting and framing are utilized to depict female characters as objects of desire instead of fully fleshed-out individuals. One widely accepted application of it is the male gaze theory, through which we can understand why women characters in media are usually represented narrowly and superficially – focusing mostly on their looks rather than agency or personal narratives.

Another important tool to use in the analysis of media objectification– The visual grammar concepts by Theo van Leeuwen and Gunther Kress. This framework is designed to consider how visual elements (color, composition and spatial arrangement) in media texts create meaning. Van Leeuwen and Kress have considered that each of the visual aspects represent certain meanings which provide a particular message to the entire here. For instance, close-up shots and unusual camera angles can be used to create a feeling of closeness or superiority while color schemes might suggest emotional tones or denote cultural background. Visual Grammar has an interest in the representational, interactive and compositional meanings found within media texts. Representational – how events/subjects are seen, interactive- refers to the gaze or contact that image holds with its viewer including angle and distance between subject from photographer and compositional which focuses on arranging visual ideas within a frame making it functional as narrative. These researchers apply a similar framework to videos — in this case, advertisements as well as films or TV episodes where visual signaling is used manipulatively to reinforce certain gender norms and sexualize women (McRobbie, 1996)..

Critical Discourse Analysis is a methodological perspective that focuses on the way language and other semiotic resources are used to construct social realities such as those related to gender—roles, relations etc. This type of CDA, is mainly concerned with the power relationships i.e. how they reinforce social hierarchy through discursive practices [2] and so on. CDA is applied on media objectification to examine the ways in which verbal and visual language contribute to reproducing patriarchal norms and values within MEDIA TEXTS. CDA analysis can thus unpack through choice of words, narrative structures and imagery how media texts support the construction and perpetuation of gender hierarchies. In another instance of this, we might look at the ways in which media constantly refers to women as “beautiful, “young”, and even “sexy”; thereby helping to consolidate a sense that their worth resides solely within their physical features or attractiveness (CDA). Moreover, it can be used in the analysis of other social and cultural texts to indicate that media representations are products as well as producers for power relations within societies which is one key point what counts – here I reconsider an argument later — when using sentences.

The intersectionality framework expands our understanding of media objectification(s) by accounting for the ways different social categories (e.g., gender, race, class, ability and sexuality) intersect to produce unique experiences of oppression and/or privilege. Feminist theory of objectification — Kimberli Crenshaw introduced the idea that women’s experiences of objectification can only be understood in relation to other features about their identity_ intersectionality. These stereotypes include the “exotic” and/or “submissive” woman, othering Latina women as the wretched migrant or African American women as a welfare queen. An intersectional lens allows and encourages scholars to further investigate how media objectification takes on different functions depending upon the groups of women in which it is impacting, highlighting a nuanced understanding about combination(s) of social inequalities that manifest as hierarchy[](4). This practice refutes the tendency to depict women as monolithic characters in media, instead reiterating for a more comprehensive depiction about what it means to be female.

This essay asserts that postcolonial feminist theory presents a useful framework to help understand how media objectification is happening within areas of the world beyond just Western cultures. Postcolonial feminist scholars posit that media constructions of women are influenced not only by gender but also by the broader contexts and histories informed by colonialism, imperialism and globalization. They discuss the ways in which Western media frequently martyrs as well as fetishizes and infantilizes women from non-Western cultures, perpetuating their positioning being “backwards,” “oppressed” or save-worthy. This framework is especially useful in looking at media within South Asian contexts, where colonial histories continue to shape cultural narratives and gendered discourses. Through the use of postcolonial feminist theory, researchers can investigate how media images of women in countries such as Pakistan are influenced by both local patriarchal values and globalized forms on media discourses which highlight a dialogue between the influence(s) introduced from global platforms (Bwewusa, 2008)..

Social Learning Theory proposes that people learn from others by observing them, through imitation and modeling the behaviors of those they perceive in television, games etc. Identified by Albert Bandura, this theory implies that fictional models affect what the viewers attitudes and behavior may be especially in regard to gender roles. An example of this might be how the repeated depiction of women in media as little more than objects to ogle can encourage audiences to conclude that these ideas are normal which they may then further internalize until it gets replicated into real life. Social Learning Theory can provide the means for understanding how repeated exposure to objectifying media contributes, over time, to reinforcing gender stereotypes so that they generalize across situations and become so culturally embedded as to appear “normal”, perpetuating a vicious cycle of gender inequality in discrimination and violence against women.

Another important approach to media objectification emerges from roots in Cultural Studies, largely drawing on the work of Stuart Hall and others. The approach of media and cultural studies, which sees identity as socially constructed in large part by the mass media—constructed to reflect social power structures. They interrogate the production, circulation and consumption of media texts as well as audience strategies for making meaning. From a gender studies perspective in fields such as cultural studies, it is important to interrogate how the media factors into naturalizing notions of femininity and masculinity—and hence continues both subjugating women through status-quo reinforcing ideologies or contrarily challenging their social norms. Our methodological approach into account the media institutions, production practices and audience responses to reflect more effectively its effects on society rather than participate in it. When viewed as a conflict between different and contested meanings, female objectification in media becomes an arena of struggle (McRobbie, 1996)..

This post examines how theories of Psychoanalysis, with special focus on Sigmund Freud and Dr Jacques Lacan can shed light into some unconscious processes behind the consumption. Psychical identity formation is another area we are keen to explore as in our experience it has a major role play along biological determinism. Psychoanalytically-oriented critics such as Mulvey have used concepts like voyeurism, fetishism, and scopophilia (deriving deep pleasure in looking) to study how women characters fascinate men through media images by appealing to myths surrounding foundational psychological fears or eroticized cravings. In much the same way, psychoanalytic theory helps us to understand that objectifying representations of women and their consequences in media don’t just happen—in this article we will analyze how different forms of media work on or with our unconscious desires for concrete explanations.

R.W. Connell’s Hegemonic Masculinity Theory analyses how the media tenaciously support some versions of masculinity as hegemonic and also valid, but reduce others to an inferiority position. This perspective suggests that, in the mass media especially, images of masculinity come to be defined by sameness rather than difference and become relatively narrow representations focused on stoicism (emotional avoidance) for boys as well as approval seeking with adults. This theory can help explain normalizing of male dominance through media that objectify women and idealize certain models of masculinity, within a framework where the subordination is natural part in gender structure.

So, to reiterate—Feminist Theory, the Male Gaze, Visual Grammar- Critical Discourse Analysis Intersectionality Postcolonial Feminist Theory Social Learning theory — Cultural Studies Psychoanalytic Hegemonic masculinity Personal analysis all come into play when analyzing media objectification. Per framework, we learn something different about what processes work to objectify women in the media context; how widespread are those beliefs and attitudes that support rape culture sentiments; and more general issues rearing their heads regarding equality between genders. Writers, critics and other authors Image objectification criticism is the result of using these different theoretical positions to provide a more comprehensive reading of some media fabric representations which could be used by those same writers or as justification for gendered equity calls in favor away (Bwewusa, 2008)..

Erasure of Women in South Asian Media

The portrayal of women in South Asian media is a multilayered blank tableau reflection decade old cultural, social and historical fabrics that verger how the feminine identity has been rendered and understood. In countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and Nepal the media is a strong force that reflects as well as reinforces societal norms so deeply ingrained into people’s minds. In South Asian media — movies, television dramas, ads and digital content etc.– women are often told to go back home or act like they do at home! Meanwhile, certain media is redefining these conventions and simply catching up with shifting views in society by debuting the conversation about gender equality, women empowerment etc. Yet, these representations are not homogenous but vary across regional and religious-linguistic contexts under the influence of globalization as well as with loci or intersections like class-caste-gender.

In the past, South Asian media has often portrayed females in traditional gender roles. Many characters are dutiful daughters, submissive wives and self-sacrificing mothers whom uphold family honor and cohesion above own desires or undertaking. This image is a realization of our super- patriarchal roots, based on the fact that anything and everything about women should revolve around their men (i.e. as daughters, wives or mothers). In Bollywood, which is the Indian symbol of traditionality and culture among many outsiders as well, a female character mostly possess virtues such as patience (Sarb), purity (Pavesi) & resilience/formidable image. They are often the ones who directly or indirectly prop up as keepers of values that come in handy to maintain family establishment.” And in Pakistani TV dramas, women are usually shown as either perfect at-home beings who adhere to societal norms or “bad girls” fighting back against these and being penalized by society. This reinforces the either/or attitude that comes from thinking a women’s worth is in how compliant to traditional roles she must be.

One such example of this is the “Sati-Savitri” stereotype, which comes directly from Hindu myths and has been a part of South Asian media for so many years. The archetype of the “good wife” is manifest in someone who can be expected to remain a virgin until marriage and then never cheat on her spouse, no matter how abusive he may be. These cultural symbols contribute to the idea that women’s main role is as housekeepers and supporters of their family, which in effect promotes a feminine ideal worthy by way of her meekness. In umpteen Bollywood movies, the Sati-Savitri ideal is reinforced with female actors cutting short their aspirations and freedom for swelling score sheets. Conversely, women who do not fit these norms: strong willed character; independent woman or a sexually liberated young adult risk falling into the unfavorable portrayal of being an antagonist and hence suffer various consequences including but limited to facing tragic endings or rejection.

Another common portrayal in South Asian texts is the “Vamp” or (more disdainfully) “Westernized Woman”, apart from the Sati-Savitri archetype. This picture of the character is almost always some form of evil intentions on their part, or just being too modern and liberated — essentially breaking all traditional standards for anything a woman should be. They are frequently depicted as the potentially ruinous villainess, disrupting domestic bliss or leading our male hero astray from his virtuous path. Here her characterization often involves wearing western clothes and smoking, drinking or behaving in a way that could be perceived as engaging physically with the body- all of which are read as markers for deviancy to acceptable female standards. In positioning these characters as morally corrupt, South Asian media endorses the very idea that women who live outside traditional norms are wrong and should be shamed by society. This binary of the ‘good’ woman – in both her traditional and modern guises (Bwewusa, 2008)., the way women are depicted in South Asian films and tv show wider societal changes — instances of how traditional portrayals have been moved with broader moves towards gender equality. Such questions are becoming more nuanced in feminist narratives of the recent past, which stand on women not just as the oppressed or margins but also as agents who continue to assert their will and power. Another thing we discussed is how more and more leading ladies in South Asian media are breaking traditional gender norms by working, getting educated and making choices. Whilst the Indian film Pink made an incisive comment on consent and women’s rights, its Pakistani namesake Verna confronted us with silent sexual violence – both offering valuable narratives through media that can be instrumental in challenging perverse age-old stereotypes and initiating dialogues. Both these movies have put South Asian societies at the front of many conversations regarding gender justice and women’s autonomy.

Female Objectification in ̂pan Siriasis — An Analysis

How female objectification is portrayed in Pakistani television dramas reflects broader cultural, social and normative patriarchal expectations for what women are able to do (or not) within society. Such dramas, which reach millions of viewers at home and abroad through the diaspora, are important in molding public perceptions about gender. Continual objectification of women inherently makes them into subordinates and thus only a certain appearance, young with features like thinness etc., is attractive to society but nobody wants this there-no matter how much they glamorize subservience in their actions therefore providing no extra room for standard dimensions that are present within traditional gender roles: if accepted adequately on part suffices stereotypical views growing systematized servitude held by men perpetuating existing status quo established across numerous frontiers — bracing our world political machinery employment law practice medical care settings public office voting standards industry adopting company policies raising family responsibilities household duties these could be prospects In the realm of Pakistani drama serials good for its (so-called) verisimilitudes and emotional depth; we would have Muslims first customarily dead from flesh-and-bloodiness. However, female characters are often reduced to things for men to have and Patriarchal archetypes; pretty playthings lost in the darkness of a major character (Tuchman, 1979).

Among the many facets of objectification of women in Pakistani television dramas, one vile typecasting that beats yesterday’s dumpster fire is passivity and compromise as receptacles for virtue; a way to dehumanize female characters into nothing more than extensions serving family. They are the mothers who radiated patience, daughters armed with grace and fortitude beyond measure & humility when faced off evil. The arch of the character is often built on their ability to hold family honor, suffer in silence or surrender her dreams and aspirations for others. This representation justifies our normal notion that a woman is should keep family and help male relatives; either by taking care of children, running household or those who may leave their means. These accounts not only reflect but also substantiate common representations of women as deferential, contingent or invisible.

A consistent trope of “ideal woman” is permeated innumerable Pakistani dramas—those women who are placed into the binary of ‘good’ wives and daughters-in-law vs. those that are twisted as sinful seductresses who defy social norms。 Ideals of motherhood in film are all sugar and spice (and everything nice), while women who refuse to conform — sexually active, career-focused or childless — must face the consequences for their lack of allegiance. This binary pairs quite clearly with the belief that a woman must fit within patriarchal norms in order to be considered worthwhile. But those are what detractors might refer to as the traditional values — anywhere in storytelling where characters deviate from them, for example by being strongly career-driven (women), or willfully independent (also women), or sexually selfish and seeking more sex all across festooned with yet another fragrant bouquet of astonishingly obliging labradoodles because they never heard The Golden Compass warning about them up north — must wind up looking either damned near literally like Eva Gabor on TV’s which is not really fully satisfactory answer at ALL. These images then go on to strengthen the message that straying from narrow gender-specific roles is harmful and punishable by more of the same objectification – ads like these are part of the problem neutrality (MacNeill, 1988)..

Additionally, invariably the way various women are visually presented in Pakistani television stories– focusing on what they look like so that even, say a tortured and maimed acid-burn victim—as someone to gawk at as if she is no more than an ornament. The camera often hones in on their bodies, framing their faces and eyes or other body parts just so to show off how pretty they are as women. When using close-ups, soft lighting or slow-motion shots we often romanticize our female characters making them the object of admiration rather than active subjects. Costumed and objectification (also play a two-way street); characters dressed in frilly dresses, laden with jewels and makeup to make them easier on the eyes for enjoyment whilst sending us clear messages of traditional concepts or standards of beauty. Even when women are central to the narrative, much of it is geared towards a visual emphasis on their looks instead of what they act or take decisions about; hence reinforcing that one ounce more that they matter in terms of how thy look rather than anything else.

Female objectification: This one could easily be the most common form, portray women as eternal victims in Pakistani television dramas. Girls are often depicted as victims of men — be it rape, domestic violence, emotional abuse or socially oppressive acts against them. These narratives shed light on issues that affect women but do it by painting a portrait of oppressed, helpless irresponsible femininity seeking salvation from the next man. For example, a woman might is shown suffering years of abuse by her husband or in-laws only to be ‘rescued’ by another male character who provides security and second life. This story reinforces the concept that women themselves are weak, to be protected by men. This is true in that the show strives to critique patriarchal culture, but then consistently falls into its traps by refusing to present women as agents capable of changing their circumstances without male intervention.

In fact, Pakistani dramas have the habit of using women to tell a man’s story — they authorize him to develop or advance his storyline. With women, their stories often came back to the men in their lives which hinders character development and could create a very one-sided female lead. So, female lead in A.W.A has power to do whatever she wants but unfortunately for a lot of women out here our-life’s-actions-thoughts and emotions will always play second fiddle to the life-story-action- thought processes and motives ambitions or fears all have subdue down below just one — ‘man’ coz that is what every other drama makes them appear like. When we do this, what I really believe happens is that it categorizes the voice and perspective of a woman to only be two-dimensional or worse still not nearly complex nor layered as male opinion — when in fact just like with both genders you can cut through some butch bullshit. It is part of the larger problem that reinforces women as, literally and figuratively, second-class citizens who exist primarily to fulfill men’s wants and desires (McRobbie, 1996)..

Even when Pakistani dramas show strong or independent women, these narratives often end up reinforcing the patriarchy by limiting their empowerment with a hundred sneaky clauses. Thus, while you may see a woman be career-driven and ambitious, it is almost inevitable that she will have to pick between her professional success or living up to her duties as “head of the family”, entreating audience members that women can’t rule both camps. On the other end of the spectrum, a strong female character might get softened way down over time as she is gradually worn by societal pressures or romantic entanglements into oblivion supporting some notion that women still should be traditional anchors to find true happiness — and acceptance. These kinds of portrayals, while they are found even in narratives that appear to be progressive on the surface (Portman’s character has power and agency), ultimately deny free choice from female characters; further generalize women as objects for Male Purposes; or give up being True Women since Being Strong TM is masculine rather than femininity.

The cultural-religious context of Pakistan is also important in normalizing women objectification during Television dramas. In a primarily Muslim community, modesty and conservative gender roles commonly shape media representations. Those women who do not conform to these culturally determined norms, e.g., wear up-to-date or skimpy clothes, act in independence of men and generally transgress male-prescribed rules are often labeled immoral, rebellious or “Westernized” (which is never a compliment); This method enforces the idea that women who behave promiscuously are undeserving of honor or protection — ultimately deepening their sense of otherness. This provides a new lens of objectifying women: religious views include moral questions – what kind of girl a woman is, not only in term of her action but also for her looks and nature McRobbie (1996),.

However, amidst all these advancements (or lack of them), some quite clear exceptions can be found amongst Pakistani dramas in the depiction of female figures — their strength and agency. A few dramas are breaking out this rut by portraying women as actual human beings who live in societies where their choices both personal and professional, should reflect some basic understanding of the modern world. Series such as Udara and Meri Zaat Zarra-e-Beishan take on subject matter that deals with sexual violence, domestic violence, women’s autonomy: narratives which indict patriarchal norms whilst lobbying for the rights of women. That said, such instances are relatively rare compared to the ubiquitous sea of traditional roles that continue to objectify women. Progressive portrayals are pluralistic but regressive narratives run parallel, in its total the fight for female objectification is exposed and continues to be very much alive within Pakistani media.

The exhibition of female objectification in Pakistani dramas is quite a complex issue and goes on to further exemplify as well as perpetuate the gender dynamics that exist within our society. Despite certain exceptions that attempt to question traditional gender norms and offer more empowering female figures, these often remain the exception in among an abundance of objectified portrayals. The representation of women as chaste, subordinate and adjunct to men in these dramas simply works against gender rights separation and social progress. Real progress can only be achieved if women are represented in greater diversity with their own stories of individuality, self-actualization and social transformation beyond the confines established for them to struggling over male attention or as adjuncts supporting a tale about men.

Things like objectifying women and semiotic visual

Visual semiotics is the investigation about signs, symbols and visual codes in cultural context that render meaning. This is a strong tool when used to analyze female objectification in media because it provides the RWCW with an understanding of how these visual aspects feed into three different typologies representing women as objects desired, serving or marginalized. Across other modes of visual culture, such as television, film and advertising or digital media, an engagement with the semiotics (study of signs) in these realms elucidates processes by which women are objectified through image-making in ways that prompt us to understand them not for their intrinsic humanity but rather viewed by what they look like — portrayed consistently either from completely lacking agency until provided/dominated or driven purely on impulse. When we study the visual signs. e.g. gaze, framing, color and lighting of these images as well their body language within those pictures to under what ideologies

The gaze is arguably the most pervasive visual semiotic in relation to female objectification. Laura Mulvey discussed this idea of the male gaze in her influential essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (1975), making it possible for us to understand how women are objectified within visual media. The most noted consequence of the male gaze is that it positions women in visual texts as little more than passive objects meant to satisfy the presumed heterosexual male observer. It is done by reducing women to their bodies: the camera angles and framing, deleting options emphasizing female presentation of body parts for viewer scrutiny. Media often does this by displaying parts of the body, like lips or legs and breasts in closeup for example, to focus on a part of a woman’s agency (her physicality only) instead making her into an individual who is whole. What a brutal attack on agency and subjectivity, constructing these women in such visual ways that instead of being the experiences through which we are asked to see them they literally become utilitarian objects for sight rather than seeing.

Visual communication, on the other hand, which is crucial to the semiotics of women as objects can be absolutely reductive when one considers composition and framing. How women are portrayed more so than men says as much about the unwritten norms of society, the power dynamics that lie beneath. Within lessons on the visual semiotics, this framing can also pigeonhole women as passive victims (submissive and vulnerable) which plays into other stereotypes of seeing women only through the lens of desire rather than agency in their own story. You can trace this right down to the concept of ‘the male gaze’— a term coined by Laura Mulvey in her work Females, Objectified: The Female Gaze and Male Domination In Film — which suggests that visual arts are structured from first base itself for (a) an assumed default masculine viewer. Women are generally belittled and viewed with less power or importance than men by using some framing techniques, like a particularly low-angle shot.

This is a good way of making low-angle shots especially informative. A low angled shot of a female character has the effect to attenuate her presence. It gives a privileged perspective to the viewer, positioning him or her above the figure with more influence and control. Using this shot technique may inadvertently tell the audience that she is a weaker character in an attempt to portray her as “small” or easier defeated. It plays into a power dynamic where the audience, especially if made up of males, thinks it is better than (above) that female character. The “voyeur” so to speak, is now the person watching — and not only does he have control over what happens in front of him; the woman before his eyes becomes something which keeps its meaning until watched or observed by a viewer.emf对象 The godlike gaze from above; here the viewer is imagined to be in a higher position, looking down—as reflected now through the woman’s presentation—is looming and beyond her immediate view but still suggests that she exists under him.

This visual framing is reminiscent of more general cultural and historical narratives around gender and power. Women have been the objects of male gaze in art, literature and then film for centuries – existing to be sexualised or assessed by a masculine spectator. Women – outside, below the line of activity and dominance, women defined in their ‘otherness,’ alternative terms established by photographing from a low-angle shot. This fact is only increased by the power that those who hold it over this mode of production would have to manifest in media, i.e. directors and cinematographers etc., recognize or not resignate with these visual conventions which again manifests itself purely by their revenue functionality. This framing of women is not just a technical issue, but rather an example as well social and cultural context defining how should the woman be looked at?

This pervasive narrative instead promotes harmful stereotypes around certain groups of people, as the repetition on these framing techniques across visual media leads to someone who is outside that community and only has knowledge from said visual media comes up with a conclusion based off what they have seen. It may be a subconscious encouragement, or just pure lazy storytelling at work that is putting women to seem passive beings by placing them in lower angle shots with male characters are providing surveillance over their body parts when on conscious revisit the consumption of art handpicked through this filter discouraging and when done so regularly it only reinforces invisible point from which we consume all narratives alike. It is only then that the audience starts seeing and perceiving women in a certain way or stereotype (according to their programmed values) on-screen which ultimately format how they expect and want them be, live, behave off screen. Thus, the visual lexicon of film and photography is a primary mode for furthering patriarchal gender norms while upholding current power dynamics.

The male gaze is a type of perspective that reduces the female body to parts, rather than as whole people —which again allies with objectification. Focusing close-ups on body parts rather than the face or whole person, creates a sense of looking at physical attributes detached from an actual individual which perpetuates this notion that beauty = her worth (vs. personality / intelligence/ will). The framing here is intentional: because humans are made up of parts, and the male gaze dehumanizes women by deconstructing our bodies into their constituent elements which we have now presented as evidence that you only want us for individual body parts (rather than a whole living breathing person). It is a technique so ingrained in visual storytelling that it often goes unnoticed for its oversimplification of the perception and veneration of women.

This very idea of the framing of women in passive or submissive roles goes hand-in-hand with certain poses, which put her either behind something to hide parts of herself completely and are hidden from view by an object, shadow or another character (only half a woman if you will). The choice in this composition frequently marks women as unimportant, or objective-less beings who serve only to be part of the scenery and world development for male protagonist centric stories. Conversely, male characters are often favored with composition that centers or spot lights them and denies the buffer of background to function as obstructive object (the most obvious sets itself a form an obstruction in his mirrored view at top left), which creates them as the true subjects — active agents too. When women are moved to the back of something or when images hide them, it communicates that their stories are less important than men’s and that what they do is nowhere as meaningful.

Even women who are centered tend to be positioned in manners that indicate helplessness, delicacy or submissiveness. For instance, it might show a woman in profile — directing her gaze towards she is looking away from the camera so unable to make direct eye contact with viewer. It might enact a fantasy that she is not an interlocutor in the visual conversation but rather something to be seen, manipulated and interpreted by others. In contrast, male characters are more often observed returning the camera or gazing off in tothe distance with a firm gaze which may be interpreted as determined, controlled and on assignment. The difference in these portrayals also supports the idea that men are active agents of not just being able to control narrative but as well observation, while women continue to be passive objects for sight.

Moreover, this way of framing women as submissively passive is embedded in other complexities like race or culture which give a different depth to the representation of women visually. Women from other races or ethnicities, for instance, might be more framed in ways that depict and promote these racialized or culturally recognizable stereotypes. This may even deepen the way in which women of color are painted, othered and fetishized — ultimately complicating their construction as objects to be gazed upon for a male viewer.

To sum it up, framing and composition is the main formal means to construct with a point of view through static visual media. Women are rarely abstracted in this way without the values of a male-oriented perspective, contributing to yet deeper layers of women as object — and assuming powerful gender stereotypes. Visual media overtly supports the status of women as inferior to men, passive followers who have always maintained this second place by means such as low-angle shots and body fragmentation. So, when we are in the dark theatre for some entertainment during those hours off work or need to chill on weekends and catch an episode of a series; that not only changes how women can be seen through mainstream traversal but also plays out as broader societal ways by which society remains tuned-in with mannerism attached around-stereotypes in them till date. Deconstruction and questioning of these visual conventions is necessary if we want to create a media that features women as entire human beings with individual narratives, their own agency and autonomy.

Certain styles aim specifically at objectification whereby men take dominating roles (AACO); multiple names I/The Other/you/etc. In the same way, familiar framing techniques such as tight close-ups of women that isolate all view except for her face from everything around them may suggest she is held in or has no kind od free rein over her surroundings. Male characters, in contrast are often shown with wider shots of them controlling their surroundings. These facts of composition enforce gender hierarchies through their very nature–they signify that female characters are constrained or limited, where male ones can act and impact the worlds around them. Besides, visual semiotics examines the position of women in photographs where men are present. Attention to women is often relegated to the margins, ensconced in a background energy of secondary or supporting actors for directly relevant male figures which by definition weaken their weakened stones they want-less than foundational.

Another important semiotic part, which reinforces the objectification of women are colour and Lighting. I mean, it’s not like different colors almost always carry cultural connotations and therefore actually change how we see these women? Take the color red, for instance; it has a longstanding association with passion, seduction and or danger — qualities that are used both to glorify women in media (how sexy she is) but more often than not framed her as an infamous temptress. Women were depicted in soft pastel colors like pink or light blue so that not only women (virtues) are tender, innocent and delicate but also asserting the traditional gender stereotypes of femininity. Secondly, lighting goes a long way in crafting visuals narratives for women. This type of soft, diffused lighting is popular in creating more ‘glamorous’ or what we might call “idealized” images that blur out imperfections and make the character look as pretty/young/desirable/’dignified’ as possible (again reducing a female icon to simply her looks). Alternatively low key lighting may be used to portray girls as evil or deviant, sinful and untrustworthy. Media shapes their understanding of what it means to be a woman — supporting narratives that limit them or showcasing strong female characters in control of unique situations.

Moreover, the objectification of women is helped along by their body language and how they are positioned. The same is true for how a woman poses her body, signaling surrender or openness; inviting and submissive. Women are often portrayed with their bodies turned at an angle, heads hung low, or in positions that imply fluidity and weakness (Holliday 2001). And you often contrast it with the way we use male characters: standing tall, squared shoulders and fists clenched to indicate power. Additionally, the depiction of women sitting or lying down in a relaxed/post non power position reflected as sexually available and without any control. These portrayals serve a dual purpose: reinforcing the notion that female presence is to be viewed and used, not considered as an active part of story/events. Likewise, a woman looking down or away from the camera can suggest modesty, shame or submission. Corresponding with conventional patriarchal values that dictate women’s behavior and self-presentation McRobbie (1996),.

Similarly, the visual codes of costume and makeup are also used to objectify women in media. Often female characters have clothing that is form-fitting, low-cut and showing off a nice amount of midriff; it comes across as if the main goal was to objectify her not make sense in-universe. Costume design can be an exploitative medium as a woman might not even require to dress in sexy attire for the storyline but they could still feature her with outfits enabling male gaze. For instance, women who are portrayed as journalists or detectives may still be shown in high heels and form-fitting attire (or low-cut blouses) that have nothing to do with their profession but help up the sexy quotient for guys watching at home. Another semiotic code is makeup, which tends to objectify women by highlighting eyes and lips (symbolically feminine features) that are usually related with beauty/sexiness. This makes out that a woman’s value is inextricably linked to how she looks and tells us that the most important thing for her do be (according to mainstream media) is beautiful.

Finally, the use of symbolic association and metaphors adds to these visual semiotics around female objectification. Symbols or metaphors associated with fragility, purity and temptation often represent women in media. In contrast, flowers, birds and running water symbolized innocence or beauty of a woman whereas snakes apples and dark alleys represented sexual temptation or danger.

But by forever referencing and building on these tropes, the renowned cycle of representation assures that women are only represented through a finite spectrum. This intertexuality helps to wanly buttress preexisting cultural norms surrounding gender, and makes it all the more unlikely that new modes of female representation might take hold with an avenue into mainstream acceptance (Bwewusa, 2008)..

Another semiotic strategy that perpetuates female objectification is juxtaposition. For example, the image of a woman as sexualized eye candy combined with an active male character. In turn, the dichotomy further emphasizes traditional gender roles and implies that men are naturally more aggressive, dominant and controlling in nature while women are gentle yielding second rates. These juxtapositions perpetuate the patriarchal product of gendered power dynamics: men are subjects who do, and women are objects to be done. This visual strategy not only does so by objectifying women, but also reinforces hegemonic masculinity in reducing all gender roles to a simple binary framework of what is appropriate for both men and women to do.

To finish, visual semiotics serves as a strong looking-glass to decode the dominant, male-dominated gaze that women are viewed through in media. From the way they direct our eye to a woman onscreen, through framing (pl. demonstration), color and lighting, body language (and labia puppets), costuming (“the virginal whore”), symbolism services hapless bottoms expiring in intertextuality or some such raffle, right along deque Erling texts with Babb booming juxtaposition… visually encoded patriarchal norms come heavily suggested by these ornately coded visuals. These elements interact to create a visual system that enforces the gender hierarchy either by objectifying women as mere recipients of male pleasure or exploiting their peripheral Genesis. Being aware of these visual semiotics is essential in order to pull apart and confront those complexes that objectify women into othering representations, ones flattering the complexity, autonomy and agency present within all u’s girls!

Impacts of Women Experiencing Objectification in Entertainment

Female characters largely against male appendages or merchandise, in stereotypical roles overly reflective and/or exaggerated appearance/size for sexual availability. This repeated representation through movies, TV shows, advertising and Music videos among other media ( be it real or something as simple as depiction of gender roles) refers to the subtle yet gradual strengthening mechanism for more inequality impacting issues such perception by oneself, prejudice from others or even (intersection with ) Status quo in society. Some of the most deleterious effects stem to women — it has reduced their self-esteem and body image. Repeatedly seeing unrealistic beauty standards in media can often lead to body dissatisfaction, lack of self-worth and sometimes due to the pressure it might take on more serious mental health problems such as anxiety disorder, depression or any kind of eating disorders. Some suffer the consequences of being force fed one non-negotiable version of beauty and choose to starve themselves almost into oblivion or subject themselves to threatening, dangerous cosmetic surgery. Therefore, women internalize these objectifying messages that have an immense impact on how they view themselves and their value.

On a bigger scale, objectifying women in media ads to the toxic culture that promotes gender-based violence and harassment. This way, media easily promotes how women are treated as things rather than people, these despicable ideas constantly generate more room for further pushing the idea that it is appropriate to harm them. This in turn desensitizes the viewers to real life violence and harassment, making the social environment more conducive for such behavior as it might not be a big deal anymore. Studies find that exposure to sexually objectifying media content increases tolerance for sexual harassment and diminishes empathy with victims of violence against women. It promotes a victim-blaming culture, in which women who deviate from culturally sanctioned definitions of femininity or dress are blamed for the abuse they suffer. The blaming of victims is how so many women are kept from coming forward to report violence and be rescued out of the oppression and abuse that men commit against them( McRobbie (1996),.

The economic consequences of the objectification of women in media are equally real. Objectifying women is when they are regarded as an object or a thing, rather than human beings; this reduces their value to just physical attraction and makes them more subject to discrimination in the workplace including pay disparities and fewer chances of promotion. Society has a system where people accept all the flaws clothes breaks marks in life with more ease for a man over woman, blindly! Firm emphasis on appearance also means unequal hiring practices and occupational segregation as more women turned into roles that matter less about skills or competence but tend to be potentially seductive instead like receptionists/waitresses, hostesses etc. Doing so perpetuates narrow conceptions of who gets to occupy top earning, high status positions while continuing with the work quota that women in things like on-screen analytics are there first and foremost for their looks than anything else.

Moreover, in media and at the macro environmental level of society there is a cycle-of-normalization occurring where female objectification keeps patriarchal structures well-oiled through recycling traditional gender roles. Many of the constant representations of women as mothers, housewives, or targets it gives a signal that their place is only within home loving men and caring for him instead to be leading in her right. The representation can deeply influence public policy and social norms ranging from family laws, employment practices cultural expectations related to leadership and authority. Through underlining these roles, the media, in fact supports gender inequality of both the public and privet world naturally reducing women’s participation to politics business will be other social economic abyss.

In addition, when men objectify women, themselves it changes how they see members of the opposite sex which leads them to have a false idea about gender roles and also expectations. Men who view media that normalizes seeing women as objects can start to see them in the same way, resulting in harmful behaviors and unhealthy interactions. Manifesting as everyday sexism, harassment or treating women as just not that good at things. And further entrenches toxic masculinities that build the inherent value of men in power, control and dominance over women. In doing so, objectification reduces not only women but also men and society in general to lesser human beings with the consequences of marginalization, disempowerment and eventually violence (Bwewusa, 2008)..

Future directions: Barriers and Recommendations to More Equitable Representations

Transitioning to fairer female representations in the media offers both incredible difficulties and potential for gain. Then there are deeply ingrained cultural norms, patriarchal values and commercial interests resistant to surrender. In contrast, there is a growing recognition and movement of advocacy for gender equality — driven all things feminist as well as the changing expectations of audiences and democratization via digital media platforms. However, one of the biggest problems faced is who is controlling global media and a few massive conglomerates dictate much what passes as representation. They chose profit over ethics, focusing their attention on the kinds of content that sell and deflecting away from controversy to keep a wholesome image before as wide an audience as possible. Focusing on profit may also cause media producers to rely on stereotypical portrayals of women, as these are believed to be more sellable and less risky than progressive or unconventional narratives. Moreover, the continued domination of men in decision-making roles throughout media ownership and leadership can further contribute to biases based on a gender favorable treatment pattern.

An additional problem exists within the cultural context, especially in such male-dominated societies. While the encouraging point is that many contexts do support gender bending characters, most be it community elders, leading lights and conservative members however may have an opposing view about such portrayals of ‘effeminate men’ or ‘butch'” women. This can manifest in things such as the public shaming of depictions of women trying to prove themselves, or characters who have impose on independence portrayed by Bollywood bulking everything else together. Schedulers being blamed and censors for having no morality just aside ways. But this cultural perpetuation of the political can make it harder for creators to give women some representation space and strive towards a complete picture. Likewise, there are also regulatory challenges given some governments restrict content because they consider it morally unacceptable or socially harmful and this can limit the space for more diverse and equal portraits (Lynn, 1996)..

Nonetheless, irrespective of these challenges there exists giant variables in concert when generating a lot more equitable representations while using the media. Digital platforms and social media have made content creation, distribution and consumption more democratized now so everyone can have a say. Independent filmmakers, content creators and activists are increasingly using these platforms to tell stories which aim at challenging traditional gender norms and showing women outside of their stereotypical representations. Web series, podcasts and digitally published magazines do for example create spaces for stories centralizing females’ female experiences that are to some extent more nuanced than mainstream media will touch on. Such digital platforms greatly expands room for experiment, creativity, risks and thus contribute to broadening media landscape.

Audiences want more diversity, and a real-world representation of what women are actually like. As more people become conscious of struggles against gender equality and social justice, they have been quick to reject stale tropes in search of narratives that reflect the complexity real world experience women encounter. Here is where the shift in audience preferences opens up a new marketplace, allowing media producers to use forward-looking programming that mirrors societal strains with incredible specificity. Also, research supports the notion that diverse and equitable media can be financially successful or win critical praise — this means suggesting content with racial equity is not profitable might be misleading. Orange is the New Black and Wonder Woman are two works that show people want to see scripts with breaking gender roles, including agency stories flavored by female diversity.

Advocacy and activism can also be great levers for change. The feminist movement, the international community and most recently grassroots campaigns persist in advocating for gender equality within media outlet. The combined power of the #MeToo social media campaign, gender equality pledges by film festivals and demands for increased diversity in hiring at news organizations are creating impetus both within Hollywood’s halls of power and demo outside. These campaigns have resulted in concrete accomplishments, like representation of more female filmmakers and producers, balanced gender composition among the nominees of the various awards and leading media companies introducing diversity as well as inclusion policies. If this type of work is supported and amplified, there’s certainly hope for continued growth in media equity. (Ridgeway & Balkwell, 1997).

Media literacy and education are important for counteracting objectification, as well. Society can then work on producing a more informed and conscious viewership, especially among the younger spectacles if it educates audiences about objectification, as well as critical media consumption. Media literacy programs have the potential to provide us with tools on how to identify, interrogate and combat stereotypes then we shall by being better informed can start seeing that differences between genders aren´t as binary or polarized. Consequently, the demand for better media will eventually increase as a more informed audience can now see through blatant marketing ploys.

In other words, the path to equity in media and better representations of women is a long one with many challenges but also opportunities. Working through digital platforms, being increasingly responsive to the evolving needs and expectations of our audiences, playing a supporting role in advocacy/activism toward greater equity, joy and success for all Canadians — those are ways we contribute to cultivating a media ecosystem that truly represents diversity. One can argue that such a shift is advantageous not just for women but also society collectively, as it leads to better justice and empathy in the wider portrayal of human experiences. To make real change, all relevant stakeholders—creators, regulators, consumers and advocates alike—need to come together to break down the systems that support female objectification and create a new space in media for gender equality.

Research Methodology

Using a qualitative research design, this work adopted Visual Critical Discourse Analysis (VCDA) to explore the representation of women objectification in few scenes from Pakistani drama Bagchi. VCDA was chosen because it is programmed to demonstrate power relations and the ideological foundations of visual elements alongside verbal ones. Analyzing the way these elements served to reinforce gendered forms of objectification in fictional female characters, this methodology presented a complex understanding not only for media€™s participation but also contestation with societal norms on gender. This study was focused on visual and semiotic analysis of the female protagonist, Fauzia Batool to investigate that how her portrayal suggests wider cultural mindset towards the objectification of women in Pakistan.

The first step of conducting this study was establishing the constructed area, and goals research. Its main purpose was to examine how certain sequences in Bagchi reinforced or subverted the objectification of women through visual and narrative elements, and what these representations could mean for gender ideologies within Pakistani society. To meet those aims, the research looked at particular scenes which had dynamic elements in terms of visuals and narrative communication of female subjectivity. We chose to film specific scenes from the drama using purposive sampling, i.e. Berlin was selected as a scene because it fit into our themes of objectification and gender roles in Nymph()maniac

Data Collection

Data collection: We started by recording perceptual content from the chosen parts of Bagchi as well gathering supporting materials like scripts, audience feedback and reviews. The original version of this photo essay was created by watching select drama episodes and making screen shots when female objectification was at its highest. Such scenes include but are not limited to instances where camera angles, lighting, framing and editing suggest the female protagonist’s attractiveness is a priority or which portray her in an overly submissive manner. Scripts were available for some of these episodes from sources online, enabling a close inspection into the dialogue and narrative forms aligning with their visual presentation. For the first time in drama history, social media platforms were audited online forums as well entertainment websites that have a gate to display feedback and reviews about how much audience has perception over female characters from this play. Using these 3 different data sources — visual content & scripts, and the audience feedback — was equally mandatory to achieve a holistic view of how female objectification is talked about in Bagchi.

Analytical Framework

The analysis was based on a mix of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and visual semiotics. His CDA framework permitted him to investigate the discursive language and symbols inherent in the drama process of objectification. This involved researching elements of dialogue, narrative structures and character interactions to identify the deeper power dynamics and biases with respect to gender. The visual semiotics examined the role of gaze, framing, color and body language as codes to reveal how they create essential methods employed in objectifying women. Using this kind of combination the research scanned both textual and visual parts of Bagchi so that how much female objectification is represented in drama can be deeply analyzed on every aspect.

The analysis was based on the Visual Grammar model of Theo van Leeuwen and Gunther Kress, which organizes semiosis into three main categories — representational meaning, interactive meaning and compositional meaning. Material landing on representational meaning, describing the degrees to which women characters (Fauzia Batool in lieu of being a protagonist) over and again were depicted as dynamic concerning their parts or activities crossing diverse sequences. The interactive meaning unpacked the image-viewer interaction, analyzing how gaze, angle and distance as visual devices contributed to Fauzia objectification. Some forms of compositional meaning applied to the ways in which visual components were composed within each cell- panels, page layout and structure – with examining how these formal choices supported or resisted a given moment pulling on objectification due to femininity.

Data Analysis Process

Data analysis started with finding the scenes in Bagchi where women were objectified. We applied our Visual Grammar model to analyze these scenes and demonstrate how various visual elements came together — or were pieced apart, in alchemical terms — when depicting women. For example, the researchers looked at shots in which Fauzia was shown as object in implied crying close-ups with a soft-back-lighting and slowness where she sharply exhibited her charm (attractiveness) showing off sexuality? Gaze was discussed, in terms of how one character looked at the other and to what position/view we as viewers were placed where able to see these interactions. It was found that characters were often shot in a way to have male figures displaying a direct, firm gaze and women (particularly Fauzia) shown with downward or diverted gazes therefore being submissive or passive.

In addition, the study investigated how color and lighting were used to create visual metaphors and underpin stereotypes. Scenes like that, showing Fauzia in traditional settings, often utilized soft warm lighting and use of pastel color motifs to highlight her innocence and purity usage; scenes depicting feminist roles usually used harsher light setting with a dominant dark color palette serving unveiling rebellion/moral greying. They also looked into how characters were positioned within the frame, and found that more often than not women were placed in backgrounds or on peripheries which emphasized their secondary status beside male figures who occupied central, dominant sites of visual representation.

The study triangulated through the use of multiple data sources and several ways to analyze it in order to secure reliability-confirming conditions [24]. Visual and textual data from Bagchi were cross-referenced with extant literature on female objectification in South Asian media to identify common patterns as well as divergences. Secondly, the interpretation of visual and discursive practices that are at play in drama were checked by experts from media studies (DGJ) as well as gender studies to confirm our interpretations. This peer review process served to ensure that the results were informed by existing theoretical work and added insight into larger conversations in quantitative media studies regarding gender representation.

Ethical Considerations

Our examination of reported revenge porn was conducted with a strong sense of ethical considerations, primarily due to the nature of its corpus (content). Bagchi also dramatizes the pretty potent story of Qandeel Baloch; a female social-media star who was allegedly murdered by her own parents. As such, the research retained both critical and compassionate distance on this subject with an understanding of the complex social and cultural situations in which much representation takes place. We were very mindful not to sensationalize or victim blame, and instead used these representations as a window into the larger picture of societal perceptions about women in Pakistan. All visual content, scripts and audience responses were sourced from publicly available information sources so the research was conducted in accordance with ethical privacy standards.

Limitations of the Study

The study with reviewed several limitations that could have biased the findings. The first limitation was that, there were scenes identified only from the selected movie Bagchi rather than representation of female characters in drama over all. While it allowed for intense in-depth analysis of some scenes, this focus may have resulted from the exclusion of other content that happened off screen but could provide valuable insights; Secondly, the authors note that due to the emphasis on visual and textual analysis of data, he findings were somewhat interpretative as they relied heavily on readers’ interpretation of these images etc. Though steps were taken to limit this through triangulation and peer debriefing, it is worth noting that visual codes and symbols are subjectively interpreted. Third, this study was embedded in the socio-culture of Pakistan that might restrict external validity. Of course, we cannot generalize about the representation of women in media if it is a local and directly associated with cultural, social or even political factors.

Analysis

The last but one chapter performs a case study of female objectification in the Pakistani television drama Bagchi, on which Qandeel Baloch was rumored( about) before being murdered ( an honor killing ), naturally inflating her life for consumption. An examination of a Pakistani television drama Bagchi, demonstrates how the portrayal’s both visual and narrative devices are used to objectify its protagonist in popular culture, the female character Fauzia Batool inspired by Qandeel Baloch. Bagchi raises an interesting and important question about the work media does in reproducing or contesting normative ideas of women. To do this, the study concentrates on specific scenes and uses Visual Critical Discourse Analysis (VCDA) to analyses both visual semiotics — such as gaze, framing lighting and color —and narrative structures that can work with or against objectification of women. The drama highlights the far-reaching effect of such depictions on societal perception about 21st-century Pakistani women – even as a plot device in an era where patriarchal ideologies remain deeply entrenched.

Visual Semiotics and the Male Gaze

At the heart of our analysis beats visual semiotics, used to create and maintain female objectification within voiceless horror through male gaze ideology. In Bagchi, the camera pretty much functions as a male eye that looks at Fauzia (which goes on to objectify her) and in turns creates the same desire for its characters and audience. In many crucial scenes, the cinematography degrades Fauzia to a mere assemblage of sexualized body parts by giving close-up shots on her lips, eyes or other bodies. As Laura Mulvey has demonstrated, it employs the male gaze that objectifies women as targets of a gratuitous and consuming visuality. The male gaze in Bagchi extends beyond objectifying, skin-baring scenes and is inscribed into the narrative at large to subtly reassert that women are objects of desire first, human second.

Framing is also used to show how Fauzia, the protagonist actress — a friend and former colleague of Asghar that he supported through her harassment publicly — has been othered. When she is with the men, her angles often frame objects to make us recall valor on a pedestal and retrench into again our bewailing obsolescence. Such as, low-angle shots of Fauzia make her seem weaker and less important, while high- angle shots of male characters establish a visual pecking order that asserts the dominance of males. Also, as you’ll see below and to come later in the rest of this post, Fauzia is so often filmed with a downcast gaze or not looking directly at her interlocutor that it immediately visually signals submissiveness (inherited from the deference one shows towards male authority). By consistently presenting Fauzia in this light, Bagchi only seems to legitimize the patriarchal norms that bind women and tell them how be—it deceives their citizens a woman should act, chaste/obedient/subservient and always within one room where men dominate.

Narrative Structures and the Dichotomy of ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Women

Bagchi employs this narrative structure, which allows itself to objectify Fauzia because one of the most popular dichotomies in South Asian media is seeing women as either good or bad. Fauzia in Bagchi embodies this crossroads between the binaries. In her introduction we see traits of the ‘good woman’ stereotype in which she is shown to be a simple village girl who stay at home looks after chores and household duties. But as she goes to the city and steps into modeling, acting; her character is then transformed towards more less moral or shrill personification of a ‘bad’ woman typecasting: makes own money from work / job is depicted not sleeping around just paying for herself so turning independent white-collar hooker. The westernization of her wardrobe, more makeup and bolder behavior accompany this transformation. However, rather than reveling in her newfound single status – the story positions these shifts as betrayals who eventually cause her downfall.

This dichotomy is overused and fosters the idea that a woman’s value comes from her willingness to follow traditional roles. This is not a story of empowerment, self-discovery but it read to us more like cautionary tales that will remind you what happens when one diverts from the confinements established. The same kind of rural-to-urban independence story played out in what arguably is a more morally ambiguous fashioned, if not full-on tangerine way. Thus, he is redistributing the tired patriarchal theme that women who venture beyond a society-defined role need to be made an example of and put back in their place. So, the drama insists on endorsing this cultural ideology that women’s autonomy outside of established male control comes at a cost and will be punished by patriarchal approval.

Use of Lighting and Color to Reinforce Objectification

The same theme of Objectification is used in Bagchi by the use of lighting and Color Schemes. The light is hidden and soft, warm in scenes that show Fauzia as a typical obedient woman with an air of purity, morality and domesticity. The chiaroscuro lighting options support what is societally acceptable as the ideal beautiful woman — any though compliant to patriarchal conventions. Conversely, scenes where Fauzia is shown in a more dominant role – like when she tells Diego how much she wants to be famous or stands up against the male patriarchy — are often cast with harsher lighting and various blue tones. Its visual contrast is symbolic, coding traditional femininity as virtuous and morally right while marking difference — that otherness a woman projects when defying said notion of female virtue in good way or sexiness to please men-only viewer gaze — conducible with danger (at worst), rebellion-actions or even lack of moral naughtiest.

Color is another way that these visual codes are magnified. You’ll see, for instance, that many of the scenes in which Fauzia is dressed head-to-toe in soft pastels (or even all white—all-white!) are at moments when you need to be reminded, she’s following traditional feminine gender roles. This colors represents innocence, purity and submission. Afterwords, when competition turns Fauzia power dressing in darker reds and blacks. The red, gold and black colors symbolize passion, danger and defiance — all of them laden with cultural meaning that triggers perceptions of Fauzia’s behavior as ‘unladylike. These visual cues are not just a picture of the beautiful but an interrogation into what it means to be female, and how her very value —and whether or not she is leading life rightfully according to Islam for some reason— gravitates akin calling ritualistically on demand(visibly through pictures) at Fauzia objectification in words made possible by patriarchal construct.

Symbolic Objects and Their Role in Objectification

The same subversion of objects to serve as symbols is employed in Bagchi for the showcasing of its female lead. Mirrors are a repeated metaphor, representing the mirror-like quality of self-surveillance. The multiple sequences showing Fauzia staring at mirrors is not only metaphor for internalized male gaze but also a very powerful way to deal with the theme of beauty standards as well. It is her constant awareness of how she looks to others, and makes changes based on that idea — the notion that a woman’s worth comes from what she offers physically. The mirror scenes reveal that Fauzia is caught up in a cycle of self-objectification keeping an eye on herself through the lens of a pervasive manmade gaze.

One of the iconic touches in the film also involves wardrobe; specifically, Fauzia wears traditional attire—like a dupatta (a long shawl worn by South Asian women)—which at first, she does so to cover-up and assimilative ethnically. The modernity she seems to step into is signified by the visual act of taking off/dropping her dupatta = defying traditional values. But the narrative paints this act as a breaking down of moral and cultural norms.

As icons of female representation

One of the major sites where objectification can be seen in Baaghi is in how it visualizes its heroine Fauzia Batool. Fauzia is almost always shown in a gaze which praises her beauty and sex appeal, thereby objectifying her as some eye candy. So often the camera gives you close-ups of her face, and lips, or eyes or whatever body part it feels like highlighting that day to remind us how pretty she is not what she’s doing..

.

And when Fauzia is depicted interacting with male characters, that objectification reaches its nadir. As for the closely shot commercial scenes when she asks her husband if he is cheating, son turns to shifty Lugosi with a leer while Nadja alternates close-ups of crying to med shots in which body langauge registers hunched shoulders and downward glances.

This is a visual framing meant to highlight her emotional fragility and the fact that she derives all value in being approved of by men, and in managing herself into an acceptable form through using meekness/obedience/patriarchal norm following. The soft lighting and pastel palette that repeats in these scenes adds to the romanticization of her own vulnerability, telling a visual story about female weakness being what we should expect culturally pretty—and mean—unless you’re Honorific process was active.

The representational import of these visual objects is obvious: not only does Fauzia appear to be represented as a cloistered non-agency, but she has far been transplanted into this world where her relation with the men around defines who and what she could possibly aspire for. Even though she wants to make her own choices or prove herself, during moments when that is evident in the scene (like wanting to inquire a career as model/actress) presenting her confidence and position by enhancing how good looking

The camera brings her body into fetishistic focus, through a series of close-ups that sexualize Rambo via tight clothing and camerawork designed to emphasize every curve while making it clear what the real goal is: exuding intoxicating hotness for male consumption. This reiterates the patriarchal message that a woman should aspire to prove her worth by making herself as attractive and sexually appealing among male-defined standards of beauty.

Interactive Meaning: The Role of the Gaze

The idea of the gaze is crucial to why it perpetuates objectifying women. In visual semiotics, the gaze is how characters look at each other and how the audience looks on as these gazes take place. The drama often uses the concept of male gaze, first explained originally by Laura Mulvey denoting that visual narratives are always tailored to please a hypothetical male spectator. This is seen in Baaghi too where Fauzia more often than not comes across as a state from the eyes of male characters and camera takes disparaged lenses to reinforce her position either subject or object.

For instance, in one of the few early moments devoted to Fauzia [Mahira Khan] she is revealed through a male character observing her from afar. The camera then moves, picture munificently any facet of her body it will file away dying head to toe together with his POV. This framing technique creates the positioning of how the male character views Fauzia on a larger scale; as something to be seen and identified by her physical attributes. The scene is partially frozen in slow-motion as she moves, adding to her being treated like an object while the viewer gets off through a voyeuristic peephole. Portraying Fauzia in such a manner serves also to underscore the idea that women are only valuable in as far as they can keep men interested.

The gaze is also used to establish a mansplainer because the male lead exerts dominance and power over his female co-lead. For instance where Fauzia is interacting with powerful male characters i.e…her husband, father or while dealing at work the camera was mostly portraying those men in power in dominant postures looking straight forward were as she will always be shot lowering her gaze down warding off a direct eye contact.

This visual hierarchy creates a power structure, with the men being depicted as in control of their lives and Fauzia meekly relying on them. Her downcast gaze expresses her adherence to male driven standards and that she has accepted her inferior position. It means that visual-device-wise, Baaghi is clearly pulling from the same cultural narrative as everyone else — of women needing to be meek and modest and always submissive to male authority.

Compositional Meaning: Framing and Spatial Organization

One of the many reasons why Baaghi objectifies women, is how elements are composited within a frame. But director Abhishek Chaubey frequently situates Fauzia on the periphery in an image which underlines her marginalization and subordination. The tendency of the film to place female characters on the periphery–literally, unless they’re Jennifer Lawrence leaping over hungry dogs at center frame seems less accidental when one considers that male actors inhabit every key decision-making part. This spatial configuration denies the legitimacy of her presence, and consequently that she has little or no weight within this narrative dominated by a man.

Choices of color and lighting contribute to creating meaning on the level composition that continues objectifying women. The heroine in Baaghi is often dressed in light, pastel colors that play perfectly with the soft lighting of your typical Rajshri film and evoke symbols like innocence, frailty or vulnerability. Women are frequently presented in a way that conforms to sexist views by emphasizing their innocence, frailty and passivity (e.g. also from the language of flowers) On the other hand, male characters are usually dressed in darker and bolder colors with more dramatic lighting that give an expression of power, authority and determination. Not only does this reinforce the dichotomy between male and female, casting men as naturally dominant and women as inherently servile.

Semiotic Signs and Symbols: Reinforcing Objectification

Watch Prachi Tehlan Talk About Women Objectification Baaghi makes use of various signs and symbols that come under semiotic to make women feel objectified. Costume and makeup stands out as the most obvious example of this. Whilst the context of (tight) clothes or body aesthetics seem to have nothing to do within a narrative, Fauzia has credit for often being made up that way and wearing very tall-necked skirts. This costume is purely chosen to accentuate her body top further sitaute herself in a male desire. Though she maintains a look that typically reflects beauty ideals (did you see how her eyes and lips are always perfectly done to increase charm,)

Either way, Fauzia’s progress from rural to urban — though clear enough symbolically on its own terms too — has semiotic weight. Her clothing westernize as she transition into a more updated way of living and her movements are shown

as being more confident and self-sufficient. But instead of feeling alive, these changes are framed as negative — her breaking free from propriety is portrayed as what undoes her in the end. This specific perpetuating cultural cliche serves to only further insinuate that women who are not wholly dependent and/or subservient under the supervision of a male figure in their lives or those who dare question popular societal standards are wrong-doers. The drama leans on symbolism—such as her Western attire, makeup and unapologetic attitude—to tell us that this is the transformation of a “bad” woman; something who disrupts society so clearly deserves to be silenced.

Moreover, in the case of Baaghi some objects and settings relevant to the objectification are also symbolically present. Like in scenes involving Fauzia, mirrors are widely used as props. This is a character who the camera will most often film in reflections, highlighting that how we are looking at her — which she internalizes whether consciously or unconsciously as part of herself — necessarily frames what defines Anita.

Discussion

By analyzing an episode of the Pakistani TV show Baaghi, we further ignore how media practices in shaping women reinforce and circulate patriarchal norms that content] to enable them into looking at their character as males for fantasize. By visual semiotics and narrative structures, Baaghi constructs its female protagonist Fauzia Batool in ways that conforms to the traditional gender paradigms and which undermine her agency while maintaining a stance of male object-of-desire. This piece intends to look at what this says about how women are perceived in Pakistan more broadly, as it engages with existing literature on female objectification through South Asian media and picks apart the ways in which Baaghi perpetuates — also contradicts – prevailing stereotypes regarding gender.

The representation of Fauzia Batool in Baaghi reveals persistent conventions within South Asian media and popular culture; the depiction of women as either binary categories, good or bad woman deeply biased bythe traditionally bound gender roles that said character could be have struggles with (Ali &Batool 2019). As with the analysis, so her character changes from good (meek and family oriented) to bad woman per se; independent and sexually aggressive). With this transformation it is viewed as the beginning of her end, once again playing strictly into the idea that to step out of what patriarchy expects women are wrong. This is consistent with Ahmar’s (2007) research, arguing that women who behave in defiance of social norms are frequently portrayed as evil and threatening by Pakistani media which deters real life examples similar behavior. The repeated framing of Fauzia’s tale as a story of ‘what happened when you didn’t obey’ is reenforcing the core societal values that suggest female compliance must never be questioned unless you are mentally prepared to face punishment, thereby only assuring gender inequality prevails.

The study also demonstrates that there is a particular utilization of visual semiotics as glow, gliare, framing and coloring are utilized to draft the identity of Fauzia’s subjugation. By theorizing the male gaze (1975, Mulvey) Fauzia is chiefly shown as an object of desire and not so much recognized for her personal autonomy. Men = Camera (men) → objectify Women men equals who they think are equal to them, and male empathy serves as a surrogate for the audience By adopting a first-person perspective The likelihood is that it means unearned, but rather inherited power access control This then continues women more/only with/out her persona Sexual appeal Beauty standards Feminine subject Female hero -iness pre-appearance Personal–sexual identity Political – issue B. Contrast to Ullah et al. found the same. According toMack (2016) this objectification is perpetuated through the display women in visual forms by only presenting female beauty as static visages and impulses Naughty or Nice of voyeuristic pleasure, gentles into pacified bodies. The women, though casually showcased as romantic interests to the male protagonists and plot devices for their putative transformation into respectable members of society (which they invariably are sans any input from said men), never cease to be sex objects in one way or another: close-up shots abound, hair flies about at excessive length during every scene change that it somehow makes its presence felt beyond all logic; lighting is such that you’d think harsh lights were outlawed by a Central Board of Film Certification circular drafted overnight post-production altercations between rival clans/crews/distributors/producers/ex-trysts angry with each other…and those sarees!

Fauzia is not only an incident in Ronny’s life but also just a narrative device to posit his masculinity, as the unfolding of Baaghi moves on re-enforcing all Piratical narratives and hence terms ambition, meaning financial independence equally being negative or morally ambiguous. From the women digest perspective, Ali and Batool (2019) explain about Pakistani drama that portrays free spirited independent women as misfit in society disrupting social values will be brought back. And in Baaghi, Fauzia’s choice to model and act — her teenage quest for independence is treated not as an assertion of autonomy but as dangerous unchastity that sets her up ripe opportunity for victimization. This serves to underline the patriarchal line that women venturing out of their homes into any form of ambitious territory is essentially a perilous and socially destructive activity. These portrayals are counter to the cultural norm that women should be in private, supporting their families and acting within a traditional role instead of trying to experience independence or freedom outside those boundaries (Zia 2007).

More sympathetically, matching corresponding season along the idea of mirroring and an internalized trope based misogyny by a reinforced classical male gaze passing through mirrors have illustrated women in traditional getups that symbolize symbols to denotatively represent how females are objectified. It creates self reflecting mirrors to internalize the male gaze that shows exactly how women become complicit in their own objectification (Baaghi). This supports the claims of Heldman (2021) that media encourages young girls and women to see themselves through a critical social lens, effectively resulting in self-objectification and perceptions about their bodies. The way in which traditional dress, including the dupatta, is used symbolically reinforces normative cultural understandings around modesty and obedience while its unfastening acts as an act of defiance yet at the same time represents something feared — a transgression from established social norms (Sultana & Rashid 2020). Bonguil et al suggest that the symbolic elements in question serve not only as a way of reinforcing media images upon which broader social attitudes about feminine conduct and appearance depends, but also represent an intermediary by which expressions of internalized gender bias can restrict women from portraying themselves fashionably.

Nevertheless, the study also demonstrates that in Baaghi to an extent overlooked classical representation of commodification and this film addresses very important social issues like honour killing gender-based violence. The Drama Commences From The Life of Qandeel Baloch, a character who dared to stand up for what she believed was right and speaks about women running against the tidal waves limiting them under patriarchal boundaries. Given the complexity of the song thus, while on one hand Baaghi reinforces some stereotypes it also becomes an interesting ground to critique and initiate dialogue about how societies police women when they attempt breaking out from roles set in stone for centuries. It is alike to the pattern articulated by Zaheer (2020) seeing as issue-based drama serials, consisting of women-oriented dramas political with historical online streaming Pakistani in shape where some have also griped against gender norms narrative storylines subverting patriarchal tenets claiming entitlement for womens rights.

But then the larger narrative of Baaghi is problematic in itself because it simply puts Fauzia back into patriarchal paradigms properly. The show may try to comment on the injustices women are handed in a society, but ultimately it fails its female lead by implying that she was nothing more than a product of her environment. The message that is being presented, as far as I can see it in the media and culture around me today… it tells women something beyond their doing better within certain patriarchal systems. These reflections are constitutive of a discursive reimagining Tuchman (1979) termed the symbolic annihilation of women in media, not stories by and about—in this case—women but fables geared toward reinforcing patriarchal control cum cultural commonplaces.

There are also wider societal lessons to learn about the treatment of women in Pakistan from its results. Dramas like Baaghi only continue an environment where objectifying views of women are at the very least accepted, and in practice allowed to prevail. As Suleman (1990)mentions, the way media represents women and men has crucial impact in shaping values of male/female roles from personal practices to construction policy. Representing women as indecisive, helpless or less virtuous can translate into everyday life with stereotypes against a woman’s full potential and rights. This is especially disturbing in a county like Pakistan, where women are already victims of immense barriers to social, economic and political participation (Zaheer 2020).

On this note, Baaghi as media text reinforce the notion of women objectification which help to construct patriarchy and hence reproductive of social reproduction with impetus on educating cadre# in manner that disallows questioning spatial-social injustice. Even as the drama addresses very real social concerns, its heavy reliance on traditional visual and narrative structures paradoxically maintains a regressive status quo in which only so much room exists for radical re-empowerment or change. To achieve a more gender-equitable media landscape, the sector must produce content that is critical rather than reproducing stereotypical norms and values; it should also offer representations of diverse, multidimensional female characters in order to mirror modern society life including women’s experiences. It is imperative that this change happens, not just for the defilement of your media but also so society itself can embrace a more inclusive and equal footing where women are appreciated beyond only sexual use or moral surveillance.

Conclusion

Baaghi, as the above account suggests, also extends an acute example to understand how female objectification is incorporated in both visual and narrative registers of Pakistani television dramas. The depiction of Fauzia Batool in the drama illustrates that media images reinforce misogynist norms around appearances, objectification and assign only gender-stereotyped roles to women. Baaghi functions on the male gaze, symbolic color schemes and narrative structures that dichotomize women into ‘good’ versus ‘bad’, only to symbolically slay them just so we can remind her who’s boss.

Though the drama everyone was raving about it riding on such important issues like honor killing and gender based violence, in essence couldn’t make lead an empowered female. Instead, it presents Fauzia as deserving of denunciation and social rejection for daring to develop her own agency under the guise that we are all common worms. Such portrayals not only feed stereotypes, but also dampen any appetite for real-life challenges to patriarchal conventions and legitimise attitudes in society that keep women second-class citizens.

This study exposes a wide gap in the media representations of women and highlights the importance to represent more balanced as well as diverse images of womanhood through Pakistani television. It can therefore either be an enabler in breaking down present stereotypes and portraying the complexity, agency and autonomy of women or it could get a lot worse before we see any tangible progress toward gender equality. As Pakistan struggles with the growing pains of social progress, we owe it to women in our country that news outlets and policymakers acknowledge this impact — while striving towards a media landscape representative both of female reality on ground as well aspirations. It adds to a larger conversation about gender in pop culture and showcases the ways more thoughtful, responsible storytelling could transform this problem

References

Ali, R. and Batool, S., 2015. Stereotypical identities: discourse analysis of media images of women in Pakistan. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 4(2), pp.690-717.

Pakistani Drama. (2022, November 24). Qandeel Baloch Last Moment with Her Brother HD | Saba Qamar’s Role in Baaghi Drama @Pakistani Drama. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HFVFtzhlFs.

Baghi episode 1 Qandeelbaloch. (n.d.). YouTube. Retrieved July 5, 2024, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL34ANFezn5o52eUz8jHj93Uj6hg_4EHA1

Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., &Lampi, E. (2024). Sexual objectification of women in media and the gender wage gap: Does exposure to objectifying pictures lower the reservation wage? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 108, 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102157

Heldman, C. (2021, October 7). Out-of-Body Image: How Media Teaches Young Girls to Hate Their Bodies and Young Boys to Objectify Them (Spring 2008) – Ms. Magazine. Msmagazine.com. https://msmagazine.com/2021/10/07/girls-body-image-media-sexism-objectification/

Morris*, K.L. and Goldenberg*, J.L., 2015. Women, objects, and animals: Differentiating between sex- and beauty-based objectification. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 28(1), pp.15-38.

Suleman, S., 1990. Representations of gender in prime-time television: a textual analysis of drama series of Pakistan television. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Tapal, Z.M., 2023. Suffering women in Pakistani TV dramas: can the diasporic Pakistani relate? (Doctoral dissertation).

Ullah, H., Khan, A.N., Khan, H.N. and Ibrahim, A., 2016. Gender representation in Pakistani print media: a critical analysis. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 12(1), pp.53-70.

Zaheer, A., 2020. Women, labor and television: a critical analysis of women portrayed in Pakistani drama serials (Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland).

Zia, A., 2007. Media and gender: Pakistani perspective. In 16th AMIC annual conference June (pp. 25-28).

Collins, P. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

Dines, G., & Humez, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, race, and class in media: A critical reader (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, gender and identity: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity Press.

Hooks, B. (2015). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Routledge.

Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553-573.

Kilbourne, J. (2010). Can’t buy my love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel. Free Press.

Kitzinger, J. (2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understanding of sexual violence against children. The Media and the Public Understanding of Sexual Violence Against Children, 16(4), 192-209.

McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture, and social change. SAGE Publications.

Meyers, M. (1999). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. SAGE Publications.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.

Ross, K., & Padovani, C. (Eds.). (2016). Gender equality and the media: A challenge for Europe. Routledge.

Scharrer, E., & Blackburn, G. (2018). Cultivating concepts of femininity: Television exposure and gender ideologies among Mexican women. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 484-499.

Tuchman, G. (1978). Introduction: The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In G. Tuchman, A. Kaplan Daniels, & J. Benét (Eds.), Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media (pp. 3-38). Oxford University Press.

van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. SAGE Publications.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151.

Wykes, M., & Gunter, B. (2005). The media and body image: If looks could kill. SAGE Publications.

Zeisler, A. (2016). We were feminists once: From riot grrrl to CoverGirl, the buying and selling of a political movement. PublicAffairs.

Zoonen, L. V. (1991). Feminist perspectives on the media. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 33-54). Edward Arnold.