Over time scientists in the field of criminology have plunged in to serious research to be able to come up with underlying factors that eventually result in criminal activities. So many theories have been established to attempt to unravel this mystery over time. One of the earliest theories developed in an attempt to explain this is the Strain theory. This theory originates from the English word “strain” which basically means that ‘force’ which tends to pull someone to the extreme in most cases whether positively or negatively ( Robert K Merton in 2015).
Basically presumes that a community or society puts an unnecessary pressure on an individual to achieve a certain goal universally agreed upon and accepted which may result in likelihood of entry into crime since most of this individuals lack the means of attaining such goals. This is basically what results in strain which prompts the individual to elicit reaction accordingly (Agnew R. 2014). Merton believes that society which has accepted and laid down goals and aspirations puts strain on people to conform and ensure realization of those laid down goals, however some people are always faced with challenges in the course of pursuing the goals such as the gap between the universal goals to be realized and their current status and situations especially in terms of finances in most cases as a result of extreme poverty. Others encounter negative stimulants such as loss of close family members and friends and abuse in life. As a result, individuals evoke response various responses which may result into crime( Agnew R. 2014).
Some people resort to compliance with the universally accepted goals by use of all the legally, ethically and socially accepted means, this people develop the intrinsic motivation to work their ways out in a clear manner. The second group of people resort to innovation by looking for creative means of achieving the goals, however according Merton some of this innovative ways are illegal and socially unaccepted. Such people may resort to stealing in order to attain financial independence, others may resort to sale of narcotic drugs whereas others especially girls will resort to prostitution. Other people may resort to ritualism using the acceptable means but may fail to reach the desired goal all in all. Furthermore, some people resort to retreatism where they neither accept the goal nor the means but they are escapists who try to evade both. Lastly, there are some who rejection of both the goal and the means they rarely go far and are mostly referred to as the resisting poor.
Strain theory was backed up by a research carried out by Merton in USA he found out that American cultural system that was ensued in the American dream that aimed at ensuring equality for all in terms of opportunity regardless of gender, class or even race. ( Messner, 2017) It stimulated people to work and acquire material wealth through legitimate means such as education and work. He however pointed out that such goals were not attainable largely due to uneven distribution of means that rendered it impossible for some to be able to achieve the American dream of financial success. This made some resort to unlawful means as proved by the data from USA that shows that the crime rates in areas where there was unwavering commitment to monetary means and weak commitment to the legitimacy of the means was very high.
The movie “American Gangster” also portrays clearly the strain theory where one of the main characters Frack Lucas makes use of illegitimate means such as smuggling and selling of narcotic drugs to be able to live up to the American dream of financial success. This is due to the yearn to provide a solution to the mysteries of life. Throughout the entire movie he is involved in smuggling of heroin and with deep connections with military able to smuggle and sell the “blue magic” the stage name for heroin. Eventually he is caught and sentenced 70 years’ imprisonment further reduced to 15.
The strain theory has its strengths and weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it can be used to explain the rise in rates of crime in economically growing countries and enormously helped in the critical study and analysis of crime and deviance in 1940 in US. On the other side Merton’s theory only attempts to explain causes of economic crime, but not others such as violent crimes and extremism such as terrorism, moreover, this theory only applies to the low class in them strive to attain their goals.( Cohen A (1997))” It does not explain about the middle class this raises questions into its relevance as a theory. Strain theory also does not explain the existence of white collar crimes that makes use of fraud and slightly legal but unethical means to achieve goals. This theory only focuses on the individuals and not the group acts that crime entails at times. It is lastly important to note that other basis of crimes such as gender differences and religion is not put into account. This in my view renders this theory incomplete in full realization of its thesis.
Strain theory laid the foundation into such research that later led to advanced theories like the General Strain Theory, (Robert Agnew, 215), That paid close attention on the immediate social environment of one instead of being interpersonal or structural oriented. Institutional anomie theory of 1994 by Steven Messner and Richard Rosenfeld argued that institutional setup within an economy can also lead to criminal behavior when not limited.
In conclusion. Strain theory development was an eye opener into reasons for crime in the society and remarkably set a strong foundation into further research into crime and basic ways to prevent its rise especially in the vulnerable 21st century.
Reference list
Robert Merton (2015) “social structure and anomie” and American sociological review 3 pg 670-681
Robert Agnew 2001 building on the foundation of general strain theory. Journal on research in crime delinquency pg. 315-364
Messner, Steven; 2017 crime and the American dream. Belmont, CA: wordsworth pub co
Agnew R. 2014 “Revitalizing Merton: General strain theory” volume 16. Advances in criminological theory.
