Question 1
Both adults and juveniles may get charged with crimes, and all are made aware of the legal procedures and charges there are some differences between the juvenile court and the adult court. In the minor systems, a case is dealt with using the trial approach. The juvenile offender faces a hearing before judgment gets delivered. In the small order, the primary and viable goals are the process of rehabilitation while in the adult criminal justice system an assumption that a criminal section should be in proportion to the offense. When an adult commits a crime and is arrested they are charged with a felony hence, a bond is given to them which ensures their presence in the court during the case mentioning or proceedings. On the other hand, a juvenile does not have a right to bond but remains in custody throughout the case proceedings. Juvenile cases do not have a jury; instead, they have a bind (Salekin, 2015).
Question 2
Rehabilitation is the act of restoring something or someone to its original state. Criminals should undergo some rehabilitation processes to be punished and regain their originality. A proper environment is required during rehabilitation since it is a way of changing for a better life. Juvenile crime assumes growth from childhood to adulthood, and the children commit the crime without their knowledge (Gardner, 2017). Therefore, they are believed to be in need of proper management and handled with a lot of care. They are in the criminal behavior and formative stage; hence, they should be dealt with the necessary attention to continue into adulthood. Some adolescents seem to have matured earlier in today’s world due to technological exposure than in the early days. It is stated that a person is an adult at the age of 18, but there are others who go up to 25 years to act mature. Rehabilitation is the cure program for inmates both adults and juveniles should undergo some rehabilitation processes. In practice, improvement will help in reducing future crimes if implemented carefully. According to some people, prison is a very harsh environment. Therefore, it cannot bring about positive changes to the crime offenders but rather due to the interaction with other crimes( Kurlychek, 2016).
Question 3
An adolescent criminal can be transferred from juvenile court to adult court. However, this decision is too weighty for one to carry on. It is a decision made on the implications of an adolescent involved in more tough crimes requiring a symbolic justice system. State juveniles have given a permit for the most chronic and severe youthful offenders to be taken to criminal court. Additionally, it is a way of reducing crimes among the adolescent. The increase in critical crime levels among adolescents has led to a more substantial number of transfers from juvenile to criminal court.
The juvenile system was set up to enable the rehabilitation process of young offenders who commit minor offenses. However, this generation is taking advantage of this outdated and lenient system and commits severe crimes since they believe they will get out so quickly. The transfer of the juvenile to the criminal courts is a way of providing justice to the victim’s family as well as preventing more minors by giving them harsher punishments. Many children have lost the capability of providing an individualized and can quickly help at-risk offenders whose lives seem endangered even after serving juvenile sentences. It is the responsibility of the court to hold the criminals accountable. However, juveniles have so far been a distant cry for justice for the families of victims (Lee, 2016). Therefore, this has led to many juveniles being in criminal court to honor the victims’ memory of punishing the proprietor. Therefore, as a way of holding minor offenders responsible and fully culpable for their acts and behaviors, the system must become more stringent. It is a way of reducing many other crimes carried out by minors in the future.
Question 4
Over the years, the correctional population in the US has gradually increased. This community was enhanced by the series of sentencing and implementation of policy changes that retched up criminal justice sanctions. These figures were the result of the nature of incarceration, accompanied by dramatic changes in sentencing and crime policies in general. The decline of the rehabilitative ideal that the house ought to serve as the reformation of the inmates whereby they are prepared and rehabilitated to fit back into society after their jail term has ended (Marrett, 2017).
It is essential to do what is right for the vulnerable youth in society since when the youth is served well, the community gets served to its best. Increased juvenile incarceration is a waste of funds as well as it does not force the responsible officials to push harder for other best alternatives for detention.
The founders of juvenile courts focused on the rehabilitation process, and the reformers knew that the existing form of jailing was outdated and needed an overhaul. The purpose of the juvenile is to change the judges’ titles to be teachers and counselors in the children’s perspectives rather than seen as jurists. The relationship between the judges and the minor offenders transpires in the teens and youth in the community, turning them into responsible and productive citizens (Marrett, 2017).
The use of a rehabilitative approach helps to keep a tight rein on kids until the lying problems get solved. In conclusion, the rehabilitation process is a clear way of saving money; it is financially capable. The cash used in incarceration if applied to rehabilitation and treatment can protect more teens from ever harming ever again.
References
Kurlychek, M. C. (2016). The effectiveness of junior transfer to adult court. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 897-900.
Salekin, R. T. (2015). Forensic evaluation and treatment of juveniles: Innovation and best practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Marrett, S. (2017). Beyond Rehabilitation: Constitutional Violations Associated with the Isolation and Discrimination of Transgender Youth in the Juvenile Justice System. BCL Rev., 58, 351.
Lee, S. J., & Kraus, L. J. (2016). Transfer of juvenile cases to criminal court. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 25(1), 41-47.
Gardner, M. R. (2017). Indeterminate Sanctions, Juvenile Court. The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice.
