Amongst many comments on the Sluttishness phenomenology, I found it with a particular site, which seemed to be tiresome. On the website of the Council of Secular Humanism Wendy Kaminer says, “It is an extraordinary expression of feminist?” Provocative Makalesi responds to the Sluttishness spread, saying that after the statement of patented Toronto Constable Sanguinetti, public women should regulate regression such as keeping a rash of sexuality. Attack. Organized minds collect Sluttishness original word “friction” (both politically and socially), as a protest against the police and, in the opinion of women, in particular, rape, there should be a warning. The Kaminer is not alone on the issue whether the Sluttishness is harmful to feminist reasons, or they need “bitch” repossession. In his article, he says the word “toy” is the fight against most unfavorable things.
No one could find a fault on the methods used to tackle sexual violence to improve our strategies. Unfortunately, Kaminer’s criticism is based on a pragmatic language for error. In particular, it fits the fact that rehabilitation has changed significant ways. Rumor of the Passages builds from a practical position and evaluates them from a highly professional political and social structure (which preserves the preservation, which commences all conservations). Such pragmatism should be almost “conservative,” but rather than the status quo of Kaminer’s arguments is more reactionary. This pragmatism reflects the same idea quickly with the experts on protection from sexual assault.
A declaration that we cannot change, as we can see, is relayed at the critical point that we have seen above: it recognizes that the current state of the world is natural and unchanged. In fact, Kaminer believes that some types of clothing are deemed to be entirely sexually and that negotiation can lead to an event that cannot be changed. In such a formula, the possibilities of combating things or motivating men to see different ways of using the table, are the only way to improve women than their behavior change.
Therefore, while Kaminer opens openly to the protection of sex offenders who “ask for themselves,” he insists that women can be “against.” Now the real difference between rape and rage is that the important difference should not be withdrawn, and Kaminer cannot say that he is a victim of sexual harassment, irrespective of being dressed. However, Kaminer believes that Slate Walkers makes the fault when they are against their will or when they are sexually abused. Of course, sexual violence cannot prevent men from seeing women as a “sex toy,” but we can (and should) do so if the protest exceeds a certain threshold.
