Just as the lecture is focused on cultural influential resistance to the globalization in regard to the tribalism, I will focus on cultural communication language in my area of residence to address how it corresponds to the lecture. Just as the lecture puts across in basis of the McWorld, it is very true that human being is considered to be dependent psychologically. In my point of view, the leadership in my cultural setting is tolerant to the way McWorld perceives. In the part of the leadership, in the German, I have considered the McWorld lecture as very corresponding to the way the lecture on Jihad relates in America in particular. In the German, there are forces that give the animate modernity of the Jihad. In the language category, there are those give the nationality more of the progress and therefore there is the big need for the interconnectivity between the new way of communication language and the old way of putting things. There are much of the possible reasons as to why down roots of the leadership have corresponded with the globalization way of the resistance and the modernity ways just in the German. In my point of view, the factors which give the motivation of the actions taken is the fact that culture is the core value and determines the way the community and the area of concern will be operating regardless of the time frame put across. The negative impacts that I feel in this field of the globalization are the fact that it needs more of the attention based on the new way practicing the leadership. I feel like the leadership will be more effective if it is correlated to the way lecture puts it across in regard to New York. It is very different from my area of the resident but all in all the same structure.