Improving Patient Flow Essay
Effective Patients Flow plays a fundamental role in providing a better patient experience as well as practitioner efficiency. In the current world condition, appointments cannot be used as the only means to seek the doctors’ attention as well as get treatment. In the current medical centers, the emergency department or room (ER) team feels like most of the time they are “forcing” admissions to Intensive Care Units and the medical-surgery units (Belson &Hall, 2006). The team in these units is reluctant to admit any new patient. These nurses in the intensive care unit and the medical-surgery nurses counter that they only allow admission when they can, except when staffing is a tight and high census. This patient flow issues need means of dealing with it. Therefore it is important to improve patient flow. Focusing on good practice in various areas will result in an improved flow of patients in hospitals.
The Ambulatory Emergency Care (AEC)
There should be core principles in this area. Clinical stable patients need EAC as a recommended choice. This Ambulatory Emergency Care area must be open for more than fourteen hours every day for patient reception from both the emergency department as well as primary care. The AEC rooms should be near the emergency room (Belson &Hall, 2006). The AEC facility is for any patient with surgical, medical as well as gynecological problems. Immediate access and consultation with senior doctors responsible for agreeing to the required patient management plan is vital. A similar timeframe for medical review and initial assessment needs to exist in both AEC and the emergency department. Also, patients should access diagnostics at the same period as those in the emergency department (Belson &Hall, 2006).
In selecting patients for AEC, the usage of maximizing criteria is necessary. The AEC clinicians need to undertake daily board rounds together with the emergency department team to help in pinpointing patients. There is a need of displaying common condition lists which aid in identifying the appropriate AEC patients (Arthur, 2016). At the same time, it is important to grant the ACEC staff access to an emergency department to identify patients and allow automatic patient referral from this emergency department.
Patients involved in emergency admissions are quickly assessed as well as, where necessary, taken to AEC. In AEC the patients’ treatment, as well as diagnosis, is done immediately. This aids in eliminating overnight admission where necessary. Therefore, the adoption of the AEC departments results in the conversion of almost one-third of acute medical admissions of adult patients into emergency medical care incidents (Arthur, 2016).
Acute Medical Unit (AMU)
The Acute Medical Unit needs principles that govern it. This unit needs a consultant as well as an acute physicians’ team supported by other specialized physicians who are available 24 hours daily. This unit should receive patients who are stable directly from the GP but not through the emergency department (Belson &Hall, 2006). The AMU departments need a multidisciplinary team that is dedicated such as nurses, discharge coordinators, and associated health professionals such as occupational therapists as well as physiotherapists, and pharmacists. At the same time, AMU needs to have in-teach services access to support early discharge as well as patient care, including social workers, inpatient specialists nurses, associated health professionals such as language and speech therapists or dietitians, and specialists doctors. The AMU team should make ward assessments and restrict short beds (Belson &Hall, 2006). The service design should as well confirm a Royal College report. The department must contain access to all executive teams of the hospital to encourage corroborative working, particularly during peak demand periods. The handover and communication rotas application is necessary for the promotion of care continuity. Frequent board rounds and acute assessment of cores are essential. Patient arrival in AMU should trigger the start of the patient discharging processes which involve estimating the expected discharge date and time. Specific pathways need to have a standardized process. For example, the acute kidney injury pathway or the sepsis pathway (Belson &Hall, 2006).
At the same time, close working between managers and clinicians is vital. This closing working of the two teams will optimize using the AMU. For example, prevention of delay in the transfer and discharge of patients. For efficient patients admission from the emergency department to the AMU, this AMU must run between 84% to 91% bed occupancy.
A team of acute multi-professionals asses and treat any acute medical condition. The patients in this department are received from the primary care or the emergency department. Following the treatment as well as assessment the patient is either transferred and admitted to respective wards or discharged within seventy-two hours after the arrival.
Specialty and Acute Surgery Assessment.
A consultant leads the acute assessment service. The operation of this area should be ideally 24 hours every day when the patient numbers are high (Hall, 2005). The specialized trainee or a doctor with the same abilities is responsible for treating of seeing acutely ill patients. This personnel should report to the consultant any patient concerns. The process of patient assessments begin at most 25 minutes after patient arrival. The patients referred to Acute Assessment Service are always stable patient. This team should include qualified pharmacists, nurses, associated professionals such as occupational therapists and physiotherapists as well as discharge coordinators (Hall, 2005). This department must have direct access to the in-reach and diagnostic services. Also, patient arrival at this ward should be accompanied by an expected discharge date and time.
Immediately after a referral from primary care or the emergency department, the patient receives assessment as well as treatment services. The patient is then either discharged or admitted. Several model adoptions are available. However, they use the same principles (Hall, 2005).
The core principles are essential to ensuring improved patient flow. Frailty needs to be measured and identified at the first entrance with an evidence-based assessment instrument like the Rockwood Frailty Scale (New Zealand, 2012). A competent multi-disciplinary team is required for delivering old people with .holistic management and assessment. This frailty process is embedded in AEC, emergency departments, specialized wards, CDUs, and AMUs. The frailty patients are involved in their health care when in a position of making their personal decisions. Hospitals, also, need to be aware of their patients, conditions even after leaving the hospital setting (George & Robert, 2010).
The core principles aid in identifying the frailty of patients immediately after they arrive at the hospital. These patients are discharged immediately after acute care completion. These patients are as well given the right support and care at their homes that aid their rehabilitation and recovery (George & Robert, 2010).
In Specialties, simple core regulations are important. Specialties should ensure the use of simple regulations for standardizing ward processes as well as minimizing clinical teams and individual clinician variations. This process includes either Red2Greeen days, checklists for ward rounds as well as SAFER flow bundles. Every day medical review from the senior medical doctor’s generation must be done at least daily for a week. Delays in assessing or discharging a patient should have a reasonable explanation (George & Robert, 2010). Word rounds must include a senior nurse amongst other multidisciplinary members. At the same time, required procedures need completion at the right time such as writing a discharge statement as well as requesting a test for the patient.
Care continuity is necessary. A Royal College report explains that patient care continuousness must be delivered and coordinated by one clinical team’s consultant (George & Robert, 2010). A patient with an acute illness needs restriction to a single ward and after the discharge of the patient, follow-up of the patient’s condition is important. Each patient should have an approved consultant plant that has clinical criteria, both functional and physiological, for discharge as well as the expected date and time for discharge. High-risk patients like a patient with a mortality prediction of more than 11% need more attention. As a result, the consultant should review his condition after every 4 hours. Morning discharging of patients will aid in minimizing emergency department overcrowding (Arthur, 2016). When patients are discharged, early more room is created for new patient admission. The specialized team must prioritize the activities involved in patient discharge. From admission time the patient needs to be aware of their treatment plan and discharge date and time (Arthur, 2016). A hospital must ensure correct ward admission for patients to prevent delayed treatment. Any request such as Specialty review and diagnostic tests should avoid delay to enable early patient treatment. Therefore the multidisciplinary team should ensure they have a reason for delayed patient discharge.
Inpatients in hospitals work receive companionate, person-centered as well as skilled care. This patient receives immediate admission to the correct ward and remains there for treatment that meets their need. The involved relatives or patient family members, as well as the patients, are included in making decisions about the achieved outcomes and the consultant-care relevant to their expectations without harm or delay exposures. The patients are discharged minus any delay after completing the required acute care together with the right levels of care to enable them to continue with rehabilitation and recovery (George & Robert, 2010).
Admission, discharge, and transfer
These three processes, admission, discharge, and transfer involve core principles that contribute to improved patient flow in the hospital. The social and therapy work teams must work before acute care services or pathways. These team members must collect patient information on any home management and well-being before becoming unwell. On admission, the default expectation is to discharge the patient to their respectful staying places and take their long-term medication from there. A clinical treatment plan needs to be generated within 13 hours after being admitted together with the normal discharging time and date. The discharge time and date must be linked with physiological and functional discharge criteria. This process includes either Red2Greeen days, checklists for ward rounds as well as SAFER flow bundles (Arthur, 2016). Each day, board rounds ought to take place in the morning hours. Involved multidisciplinary teams must examine the patient clinical plan such as the discharging date and time during these board rounds. The board’s decision is then communicated to the patient (Jensen & Haraden, 2007).
Assessment duplications need to be minimized using trusted assessor use. The assessment must build on the admission information records (Jensen & Haraden, 2007).
A patient is discharged immediately they do not gain from the acute hospital treatment or care. Mostly, patient discharges involve patients going to their homes, and inter-hospital transfers are involved (Hall, 2005).
Primary Care Streaming
Primary Care Streaming principles aid in improved patient flow outcomes. The hospital must establish a clear criterion that supports patient streaming and the main care service. Patient redirection to various places requires safeguards. These safeguards make sure that the patient is safe and at the exact place as well as patient acceptance to the off-site services. Clinical streaming is done by trained emergency room clinicians (Rouse, 2014). This streaming process must receive immediate attention, especially 16 minutes after patient’s arrival. Achievement of this streaming is ensured on a daily and hourly basis, not average demand basis. Capacity and demand analysis is essential in determining the model, staffing profile, and primary care opening hours. The communication between the emergency department and the Primary Care Services needs to be effective as well as regular. Joint governance plays a primary role in this unit. Governance meetings held on a month basis should aid in analyzing the streaming process as well as primary care effectiveness (Hall, 2005). The risk incidents and reports are as well generated during this meeting. A four-hour A and E standards apply to any patient streamed to the co-located Primary Care Service (Rouse, 2014).
Any patient attending emergency room care with any condition that is suitable for treatment and assessment in any primary care unit is streamed into a co-location Primary Care Unit (Rouse, 2014).
The emergency department principle activities can aid in improving the patient flow in the hospital. Any patient attending an emergency room must be streamed before starting admission by trained emergency department clinicians to the relevant clinician and area. Streaming entails brief history-taking as well as basic observation performance (Jensen & Haraden, 2007). The information aid in supporting triage prioritization that has streams if needed. Streaming needs to involve any prior warning score calculation (Hall, 2005). Emergency room clinicians should prioritize treatment and the assessment of the most unwell patients. These sick patients include those having life-threatening conditions as well as time-critical illnesses, old patients as well as vulnerable patients like physically challenged individuals, people with self-harm risk, and children (New Zealand, 2012).
The emergency room clinicians further stream any patient to majors, resuscitation, low acuity, or minor injuries, among other hospital services such as AEC, rapid assessment, and assessment services for outpatient and inpatients (New Zealand, 2012).
Any patient receives timely assessment as well as clinically appropriate, emergency department best care (Jensen & Haraden, 2007).
Basic principle improvement in the mental health area can result in better patient outflow. Patients having mental health problems require assessment in environments that are safe, quiet as well as supportive. When waiting for treatment as well as assessment, reducing this patient’s distress is vital (Wilson, & George 2004). These people with mental problems need special care, and trained staff should handle them. The priority is physical need identification such as overdose use, self-injuries, and self-harm resulting from people having alcohol-related conditions, diabetes, liver diseases, pulmonary diseases, and dementia. The multidisciplinary health team responsible for treating these patients needs to be available always. This team needs to identify a patient as a risk of committing suicide first and handle them first. As well as, identifying the intoxicated people and providing the necessary support, keeping them safe, and needing transient suicidal assessment. Waiting rooms play an essential room in managing these patients as they wait for admission (Wilson, & George 2004).
The patients receiving services in the emergency room or those in inpatient wards having mental problems as well as related physical injuries get compassionate care. Skilled healthcare providers are available all the day in the hospital. Therefore, all patients receive international treatment as well as admission if necessary.
In conclusion, smoothing patient flow into hospitals as well as out of healthcare or hospital settings will aid in reducing delays, poor service delivery, and overcrowding in a hospital setting. The hospital needs to get strategies that can help in solving this problem which may increase with more people having healthcare insurance (Wilson, & George 2004). As a result, the implementation of good practice in Ambulatory Emergency Care (AEC), Primary Care Streaming, Mental Health, Frailty, Admission, discharge and transfer, Emergency Departments, and Specialty and Acute Surgery Assessment among other hospital departments can improve patient flow. Improvement in patient flow gives great outcomes (New Zealand, 2012). Patient waiting time reduces and discharges are made early to ensure new patients get admissions. At the same time, a patient can make decisions early on the treatment offered and resolve to better medication without wasting a lot of time. Also, the relevant multidisciplinary team is involved, and the patient gets the appropriate treatment easily, and home medical follow-up is provided.
Arthur, J. (2016). Lean six sigma for hospitals.
Belson, D., & Hall, R. W. (2006). Patient flow: Reducing delay in healthcare delivery. New York, NY: Springer.
George Washington University., Urgent Matters (Program), & Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2010). Improving patient flow & reducing emergency department (ED) crowding. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, School of Public Health and Health Services.
Hall, R. (2005). Patient Flow [recurso electrónico]: Reducing Delay in Healthcare Delivery.
Jensen, K., Mayer, T. A., Welch, S. J., Haraden, C., & Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. (2007). Leadership for smooth patient flow: Improved outcomes, improved service, improved bottom line. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
New Zealand. (2012). Improving the system, meeting the challenge: Improving patient flow for electives : a toolkit for District Health Boards. Wellington, N.Z: Ministry of Health.
Rouse, J. M. (2014). Improving patient flow from the Department of Critical Care Medicine at Auckland City Hospital to general medical and surgical wards.
Wilson, M. J., Nguyen, K., Urgent Matters (Program)., & George Washington University. (2004). Bursting at the seams: Improving patient flow to help America’s emergency departments. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Medical Center, School of Public Health and Health Services, Dept. of Health Policy.