A study carried out by the Expert Panel on Youth Violence shows that anger is a significant factor responsible for homicide and suicide, which are the chief causes of death among adolescents. As a result, the panel suggests that it is critical to observe signs of anger among this group of persons in the society through violent behavior, which occur on a continuum that ranges between among other things verbal abuse, bullying, fighting, and rape. Empirical studies indicate that people often exhibit anger as a means of showcasing their frustrations, tensions, and depressions. A survey carried out by Cox et al. in 1999 considered it an adaptive mechanism that people usually pursue to deal with perceived threats and hindered goals. In general, anger results from feelings of failure, irrational thoughts, being ignored or barratry among others. Nonetheless, considering the negative implications of individual and social anger, it is critical for each person to identify possible means of controlling anger.
Available evidence from the marital literature shows that expressions of withdrawal, contempt, verbal aggression and negativity usually emanate from dissolution or dissatisfaction with the relationship. According to various empirical literature, there lies a closer link between anger and violence and the manner in which couples communicate to address their disagreements in intimate relationships. Research carried out in 2008 by Darling et al. shows that most violent behaviors often arise during a conflict. However, the literature recommends that in such scenarios, the most salient issue is the manner in which conflicts are managed and discussed rather than the conflicts themselves. Nonetheless, there is also a significant body of literature showing that most of the violence and anger are exhibited by people during adolescent stages of development. A report released in 2011 by Youth Statistics, a statistics institution in Turkey showed that adults exhibit less violence and conflicts compared to adolescents. For instance, while the report showed that murdering among young women and men stood at 3.5% and 2.8% respectively, the figures were quite low among adults at an average of 2.1% (TUIK, 2011).
Children usually adopt aggressiveness and violent behaviors through their pattern of processing the rules applied to them by their parents. This point emphasizes the importance of consistency of discipline parents apply on their children. When parents are inconsistent in their administration of discipline to their children, it will be quite hard for children to understand whether their behavior was right or wrong and thus increase the possibility of the undesirable behavioral outcome. The model used by parents is also a critical issue in the determination of children’s ability to manage their anger and aggressiveness. Existing empirical evidence indicates that children whose parents are authoritarian; utilizing raising styles such as enforcing discipline through commanding, criticizing and shouting usually have a hard time in expressing their thoughts, ideas and have difficulty in making decisions. Such children often exhibit high levels of anger and aggressiveness.
When parents apply robust physical punishment, they are likely increasing anger and aggressiveness and their children’s potential to commit violent behaviors. It has also been identified that most adolescents often defy authorities, regarding them as evils thus creating violent behaviors to resist them. Moreover, other painful emotions such as not being understood, offense, worrying, loneliness, being afraid and constant disappointment are likely to cause children to become angry easily. Therefore, for parents and the general society to deal with problems of anger, aggressiveness, and violence among their adolescent children, they need to apply punishments that show them empathy.
However, besides the physical punishment applied by parents on children, there is also evidence that links the problem of anger, aggressiveness, and violence among adolescence on various physical, mental and social health issues. This is related to the diminishing number of anger management courses as well as other agencies that assist in managing these problems. A report released by Mental Health Foundation dubbed ‘Boiling Point’ in 2008 recommended that the government of the United Kingdom must consider expanding the provision through Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT). However, the report suggested that the government needed to first examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing services before expanding access to new programs to ensure that the new services would be essential. Therefore, according to this 2008 study, community-based training workshops are an essential psychological mechanism that can assist the participants to reduce their level of anger and aggressiveness.
Expression of anger and aggressiveness has also been studied across gender and race. Numerous quantitative studies have focused on determining that notion that women are less likely to express anger and aggressive behavior compared to men. The same has also been applied in some qualitative research particularly inquiries examining emotional expressions in workplaces environments. In most occasions, a number of qualitative studies have determined that women of color are often apt to express feelings of resistance, which in effect are likely to increase their anger and distress. In general, expression of anger-out among blacks is less compared to that of whites; according to a study carried out in 2005 by Mabry and Kiecolt. This duo reiterates that this phenomenon might appear surprising since black people in the United States have been exposed to all manner of discrimination by their white counterparts. According to Hartshorn et al. (2012), exposure to discrimination causes anger among the oppressed and discriminated. However, low anger-out among black people is attributable to some factors but mainly their exposure to unidentified social controls, which do not seem like discrimination.
Anger and aggression control deficits also characterize patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Such patients either exhibit self-destructive behaviors or externally directed aggression. They usually have low frustration tolerance and often experience a recurrent rise in temper. Empirical studies show that although men are physical aggressive compared to their female counterparts, any provocation of the BPD patients often elicits similar aggression across gender. These studies show that impulse deficits and lack of anger controls may result in assaults, tantrums and even physical fights. Moreover, anger and aggression can cause severe social and interpersonal issues. Therefore, despite the fact that stress does not exacerbate aggressive behavior, it is crucial to understand the influence of interaction and stress on dysfunctional behavior to adjust strategies for treatment.
Therefore, it is critical to undertake preventive strategies to eliminate the threat of anger, aggression, and violence among people. There is adequate evidence showing that the application of each causal factor has been able to prove successful in reducing aggressive and violent behavior when administered appropriately. Nonetheless, it is equally essential to perform long-term follow-ups to ensure that these strategies suffice to prevent violent behavior in adulthood. The most recent preventive intervention measures that have been identified as effective include the use of behavioral interventions and social learning simultaneously. In effect, these can emphasize to the individual’s importance of improving social skills, the undesirability of anger and violence and non-violent means of solving issues.