Academic Master

Human Resource And Management

Deontological Framework Essay

The deontological framework is based on the deontology which is the strategy of ethics based on the morality and innate virtue of the choice regardless of the consequences of the action taken. Therefore, deontological ethics are ethics that are considered to be morally and dutiful correct of their integrity and merits, when other factors are independent.

Teleological frameworks are based on the teleology that is the ethical strategy that is based on the outcome of actions and choices as the contrast to the intent. The teleology of Machiavellian is held by individuals who manipulate condition and others to get the outcome that benefits them. However, ethical values are in their minds. On the other hand, utilitarian teleology pursues results which are taken to benefit a large number of individuals. Based on (Cole 2000), the difference between teleological and deontological evaluations focus on whether the actors centers on the actions to be considered or consequences of those actions, (Peslak 2005).

Back to the case study, North Carolina based textile manufacturer is closing its operation Carolina and want to move to developing the country in Southern Asia. The main reason for the shift is low labor cost which firms in Southern Asia are enjoying. The other reasons for the move are that the firm needs to get the free market advantage and also adopt the cheaper method of production.

Therefore the proponents of the firm from North Caroline to Southern Asia base on the teleological framework. The firm focus to get the result which are the advantages of the free market and also adopting of finding cheaper means of producing firm goods. Although the firm is closing its North Carolina plant that will make its longtime loyal workers jobless which will make them unable to support themselves and their own families. But the firm comes up with the decision that will assist it to survive. Therefore, based on the teleological framework, the outcome of the decision made lay off some of the loyal employees of the firm in North Caroline. Thus there will an increase in jobless individuals in North Caroline as many employees of the shifting textile manufacturer will be laid off. Contrast to the decision taken by the textile firm by the opponents shows that there will require a reduction in trust between the firm and its employee as most of them will be laid off when the firm shift. However, the cheap labor the firm is moving for in southern Asia is child labor, according to the contractors in that location. And there was a poor working condition in the place as compared to the working environment in the United States. Therefore firm in southern Asia normally use cheap child labor, and they do not provide a conducive working environment for their employees. Thus there is mistreat of employees. The reason for available cheap labor force in Southern Asia is due to the large, desperate poor population that exists in the region.

According to the deontological framework, the action of the textile firm shifting to Southern Asia is not the best decision due to the integrity and merit the company will experience in the new location. First, the firm will lose trust between it and its employees as most of them will be stopped working that will make them unable to support themselves and their families. Furthermore, cheap labor the firm is running for is child labor that is influenced by desperate poor population in the new location. Therefore the firm moving to Southern Asia to increase poverty in the region instead of assisting the society get out of poverty by increasing their labor wages.

The best decision the textile firm should take is to retain its operation in North Caroline that will retain its loyal employees. Then expand it’s to Southern Asia where the firm will enjoy all the privileges that made the firm shift to the new locations. The firm should operate under the ethnic values of the society and should work to improve the society not to manipulate them due to their poor status.

References

Alder, G. (1998). Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics.

Bowen, S. (2004). Organizational Factors Encouraging Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics.

Faber, M. (2002). The Next Tool for Managing Records. The Information Management Journal.

Peslak, A. (2005). An Ethical Exploration of Privacy and Radio Frequency Identification. Journal of Business Ethics.

SEARCH

Top-right-side-AD-min
WHY US?

Calculate Your Order




Standard price

$310

SAVE ON YOUR FIRST ORDER!

$263.5

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Pop-up Message