Introduction
This essay evaluates the transformational leadership impact on creating the innovation in the workplace. The innovators and innovations have always involved the consideration. Organizations like Google, Southwest Airlines, Intel, Apple and 3M have been at the innovation forefront and have been considered in an effort with the intention to explore the surreptitious of their maintained groundbreaking rehearses. Majority of the studies have exposed that there is a combination of individual, organizational and contextual factors are accountable for invention. In this essay, the innovation will be emphasized and specifically how transformational leadership creates innovation in workplace that can easily unleash the capability in the companies.
Innovation – Transformational leadership in workplace
There are two of the trends that shape the businesses whereas firstly, in an economy all around the world, organizations can no extensive depend on the access to technology, natural resources or technology. As the basis of the competitive benefit loses relevance, this give emphasis to the differentiation from firm that demonstrate that it is the superiority of its labor force and their capability to get possessions done in a good way. On the other hand, the second trend is associated to the first one which also focuses the competition that has loosened from the product market to the work market. With regard to appeal best workers in the workplace, companies are bending over the backwards to offer the employees the careful selection processes, competitive salaries, good working environment, exciting roles and attractive benefits (Carmeli, Sheaffer, Binyamin, Palmon and Shimoni, 2014).
These trends usually underline the gratitude that the personnel is reliably revolutionizing and providing the best to the workplace is one of the greater sources to maintain good benefit within the organization. There is a technique to assess the extent that demonstrate regarding workforce in the organization and provide the best to the company with the intention to measure the engagement of employees in the workplace. The organization strive for the employee commitment and cannot have enough money to disregard is leadership (Chughtai, 2015). The transformational leaders stimulate the supporters with their vision and address their requirements so that they can be able to engage followers in the achievement of that particular vision. Birasnav (2014) determined that transformational leaders have become the role models for their followers that go outside their self-interests for the advantage of superior cooperative. The admirers finish to determined and seek for the motivation levels as well as by material rewards (Dess and Picken, 2000).
Transformational leadership and organizational innovation
Dussault and Frenette (2015) explain the innovation in the workplace as the formation of useful and valuable new products or services as a good missile. There is a market-oriented method which increases the definition and includes the returns because of the innovation in the workplace. In accordance of Henker, Sonnentag and Unger (2015), the innovation in the workplace in this essay is explained as the organization tendency to expand new or better-quality services/products and its achievement in carrying those services/products to the marketplace.
This kind of method is reliable with Damapour’s (1991) definition regarding the product innovations as the product or facilities presented to encounter the market need and external user and the explanation delivered by OECD (2004) as to bring the new product or deal to the market successfully. According to the study of Kao, Pai, Lin and Zhong (2015), the transformational leaders increase the innovation within the organizational context whereas companies have the propensity to revolutionize. The transformational leaders use knowledgeable simulation including the inspirational motivation, these two are critical for the innovation in the workplace. Also, in other words, transformational leaders endorse original and unique thoughts within their workplace and their attitudes and behaviors are optional to entertain as creativity that increases the services, serves the reward, modified the consideration for the followers (Dess and Picken, 2000).
On the other hand, it is also identified that intellectual stimulation increases the exploratory thinking of the employees whereas inspirational motivation gives the encouragement into the generation procedure idea. According to the study of Khalili (2016), the championing role has been reflected by the behavior of the transformational leaders. This groundbreaker grows their follower’s self-efficacy, self-confidence and confidence. Moreover, this groundbreaker inspires their supporters by their vision, enhances their inclination to achieve outside prospects as well as tests to adopt the methods related to innovation while working in the organization. For example, Khalili (2016) determined that transformational leadership was definitely and meaningfully related to the innovation of the organization as leisurely by the research and growth expenses and the copyrights gotten from last three years. Additionally, the effect of the tendency to innovate in the workplace, transformational leadership has a positive impact on the achievement of the inventions in the market as well (Kim and Yoon, 2015).
Transformational leadership and support for innovation
Li, Mitchell and Boyle (2016) argued that innovation in workplace depends on whether the company has the weather that supports uniqueness or innovation. Even when the person has developed the innovation capacity, their willingness undertakes the productive efforts by their beliefs that can be conditioned about the results of such actions in a provided environment. When the culture of the organization emphasizes effective and reliable operations without making any kind of errors or is not worried with uniqueness or innovation, employed from taking the plan in their work will be discouraged if they are provided autonomy. According to the study of Masood and Afsar (2017), this is because of the employees who fear the negative consequences potentially related with dangerous choices. Conversely, when the organization culture values the plan and ground-breaking methods, workers are more likely to take the calculated risks, derive intrinsic enjoyment, and accept challenging assignments from their work.
Therefore, the organizational culture and climate represent the shared social building which demonstrates that leaders might have considerable influence and control. Khalili (2016) has viewed managers as key roles who transform, develop and institutionalize the culture of the organization. Along with the same vein, Oldham and Cumming (1996) argues that leaders and organizational founders connect what they actually believe to be wrong and right, these personal beliefs of the individuals have become the part of the organizational culture and climate. As it was earlier discussed, the characteristics explain the ability of transformational leadership to stimulate and alteration tendency of its followers for the longer term and creative more perspectives.
On the other hand, when the transformational leader rouses labors of followers to be creative and innovative by reframing issues, questioning their assumption and among employees, it creates and values creative procedures and innovative work approaches and risk taking approaches. Once this kind of climate in the workplace is recognized, it helps as the sense-making expedient and guides the code for creative work procedures that could prime to the innovative services and products ultimately. Various empirical studies have provided the evidence that groups or organizations climate for the innovation is an important determinant for the innovation in the workplace. Oldham and Cumming (1996) found that there is a positive connection among the team’s climate for innovation where six of the indicators regarding innovation can be explained such as supervisory ratings and number of patents. Also, in other words, it is identified that there is a significant and positive association among the support for innovation and leader member exchange which in turn was associated to the innovative attitude or behavior positively among the employees (Dussault and Frenette, 2015).
Transformational leadership and empowerment
Sometimes, transformational leaders take the instruction method and often pursue the contribution of followers by making it important and providing the cooperation importance and perform the collective tasks that provide the opportunity to learn from the shared experiences as well as delegate the authority to the followers to implement any kind of action for the effective performance. Through such sort of means, the transformational pioneers create the workplace where larger part of its adherents feel enabled and look for the imaginative ways to deal with play out their employment. Oldham and Cumming (1996) have gone so far as to argue that there is a major aim of transformational leaders which is to develop the self-management and self-development skills of the followers which also allow them to make the actions and implement them without any kind of straight management or interference.
According to Oldham and Cumming (1996), the freedom or autonomy is the cause of originality in the organization due to which people produce creative work when they observe individual control over how they can be able to approach the provided tasks. Majority of the people are empowered and are likely to be motivated intrinsically as well as promotes the endeavors creatively. Henker et.al (2015) found that individuals have created the creative ideas and thoughts when they functioned in a high autonomy to get the task done in the good work environment. Also, on the other hand, it is identified that leaders are expected to have the effect of transformational leadership by only stimulating their followers in an intellectual way. When the leaders stimulate intellectually, they promote their devotees push to be innovative by reframing the issues, addressing presumptions and moving toward old circumstances in new ways. They can be able to enhance their thinking by encouraging the followers and made them think out of the box (Masood and Afsar, 2017). The inspirational motivation refers to which leaders are capable to motivate the followers in order to articulate the vision and inspirational vision as well as cultivate the psychological safety where followers can be easily encouraged to energize and take interpersonal risks to perform the expectations (Damapour’s, 1991).
Also, on the other hand, Oldham and Cumming (1996) explored that there is a connection among follower creativity and transformational leadership that has been validated in the study of almost 290 workers from 46 Korean companies under their supervisions which also demonstrate that the behavior of the transformational leader led to the creativity and innovation of workers. The transformational leaders and their behaviors enhanced the followers that have led to greater creativity. Li et.al (2016) explained that as the leader, the people should stimulate their followers through punishments and rewards so that they can be able to seek them for the cause. The leaders depend on material punishments and rewards that need to create the effective team, companies should harness the creativity in their workers (Khalili, 2016). It can be said that the investigation has made the commitment to the writing while the experimental research has determinants of the innovation and creativity which demonstrate that leadership has been understudied comparatively regardless of its wide acknowledgment among the researchers as the key supporter of the execution in the associations
Conclusion
In conclusion, prior research has recommended that styles of the leaderships of the managers in organizations can impact the creativity and innovative ability of the company. There is the main avenue where it demonstrates that there is a positive impact that arises and detained to be the establishment for the climate in the organization. The climate empowers the workers and gives support for innovation. There is an extant discussion on leadership that propose regarding how transformational leadership demonstrated by the other studies and how it affects the innovation indirectly at the collective level of the company. According to the discussion above, it is identified that there is a linkage among organizational innovation and empowerment which delegate autonomy to workers and are less instead of becoming innovative. The factors might help to demonstrate the expected findings where social esteems are high in control separate. The specialists tend to lean toward top chiefs who take control of the procedure and lead by the instance. Hence, the study revealed that workers has the high power cultural disposition and might feel disordered when alone and ask to find out what they exactly need to do and how they have to achieve their goals.
References
Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.
Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem‐solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115-135.
Chughtai, A. A. (2015). Creating safer workplaces: The role of ethical leadership. Safety science, 73, 92-98.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555-590.
Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 29 (4), 18 – 33.
Dussault, M., & Frenette, É. (2015). Supervisors’ transformational leadership and bullying in the workplace. Psychological reports, 117(3), 724-733.
Henker, N., Sonnentag, S., & Unger, D. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity: the mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 235-247.
Kao, P. J., Pai, P., Lin, T., & Zhong, J. Y. (2015). How transformational leadership fuels employees’ service innovation behavior. The Service Industries Journal, 35(7-8), 448-466.
Khalili, A. (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Management Decision, 54(9), 2277-2293.
Kim, S., & Yoon, G. (2015). An Innovation-Driven Culture in Local Government: Do Senior Manager’s Transformational Leadership and the Climate for Creativity Matter?. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 147-168.
Li, V., Mitchell, R., & Boyle, B. (2016). The divergent effects of transformational leadership on individual and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 41(1), 66-97.
Masood, M., & Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff. Nursing inquiry, 24(4).
OECD (2004). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turkey: Issues and Policies. Paris: OECD.
Oldham, G. R. and Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 607-634.
