Case Study of Healing and Autonomy
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
The Doctors needs to tell James that the decision he has made is unreasonable and damaging to his son. The Doctor is very aware of the fact that James has a complicated illness and he knows that the James would require a kidney transplant in a short period of one year or may be less. The nephrologists knows that if they failed to do that then James will suffer huge consequences and it may takes his life. Hence, with the expertise and wealth of knowledge and experiences in the medical field, the nephrologist are required to take more actions in order to save the life of Mike’s son. Though God is the only one who heals, what Mike was unsuccessful to realize is the phrase that “God helps one who has helped himself” This phrase suggests that God heals the person who has taken medical intervention. Consequently, the doctors are required to notify the parents of James that they are required to pursue medical support for their child and also have trust and faith on God that he will get healed soon.
The relatives and patients frequently faces challenges due to the fact that most of the times their selections are not grounded on scientific ideas of rationality. Though, In the case of physicians, it is a very different case as they are very educated persons and takes their decision on the scientific evidences. The Doctor is capable to use the rational-choice based models in order to explore making decisions. As a result, the doctor in this case study must applies the rationale-choice based model in examine the risky effects that are linked with Mike’s judgment and counsel him in order to change him for the better.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian to think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and no maleficence in James’s care?
The Opinions on illness and health varies that depends on numerous quantities of the Christians. Several Christians observes health and sickness as the punishment for sins that they have done in their life; whereas the others opinion it as an inducement from the God. Though others viewpoint, it is the trial of their trust and faith. In this case study, it is very obvious and clear that Mike is a loyal Christian who has faith that the illness is a trial of his trust and faith. And for the same reason, Mike has chosen for the spiritual based healing as opposite to the medical treatment from the hospital. There are many Christians who trust and believe that illness is a disturbance of the physical functions and trust that the physicians are willing to help in the treatment of James.
Christianity has a major role in medicine and curing. Several Christian morals and values go in contradiction to the ethical based practices of rejecting medical care to the patient in clinics and hospitals. The Autonomy of the patient enlightens the moralities of the patients with respect to their judgments on their medical wellbeing. The narratives of Christian has an effect on treatment refusal, organ transplant, and autonomy of the patient. The doctors should, thus, take this into their consideration. The narratives of Christian notify the patients on the risks that are involved in it. I consider that Christians must be capable of putting their faith and trust in God in addition to receive the scientific approaches of healing in our culture.
The further pressing matter which Joanne and James are fronting is their believe in the spiritual healing and their faith for good health from God. As stated by Christian viewpoint of healing, the final healing originates from the God’s will. The Christians have numerous faiths and beliefs in their excursion of faith for example fasting, prayer, anointing of oil and from healing. They have faith and belief that God sanctifies the process of anointing of oils which contributes in the process of healing. As understood in this case study, Joanne and Mike selects to delay James’s dialysis by putting their believe and faith in the God for healing. Observing one of their friend who got Christian healing from the stroke is one of the main reasons why the parents of James has decided to put their faith and trust in healing from the God. The healing has given Joanne and James a new hope that their child would soon recover by putting their trust and faith in God. Though, the healing services that are attended by the paternities didn’t act instantly to heal their child and as a substitute, the condition of James turns out to be worsen than it was before.
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
According to Hastie & Dawes (2010), there are many aspects which bounds an individual’s ability in order to take rational judgments. In the First, as an alternative of execution the study of all of the accessible alternatives, the human tend to appraise an inadequate number of options at the time and this is understood by Mike’s parents, when they were relying on God’s healing first and put the medical treatment on the second choice. In its place of doing concurrent analysis of the choices, people would choose sequential exploration which is of course risky. In this process of making sequential based analysis, the human would choose the option which they observe is going to deliver a acceptable result. In accord with James’s parents, it is the spiritual healing process, which gives a reasonable conclusions to them this is the reason why they first moves from the medical dialysis towards spiritual intervention. Thirdly, the choice-based evaluation is meaningfully prejudiced by the earlier practices. In this circumstance, the spiritual-based healing of the patient who is suffering from the stroke effects the parents of James to move towards clinical based treatment in order to get healed spiritually. Fourthly, the relatives and patients frequently notice the evidence appraising clinical practices and outcomes as imperfect and undefined. For this particular cause, the parents of James don’t want to depend on the clinical treatment to be their first option.
