Academic Master

Laws and International Laws

An Essay on Justice

Justice can be defined in today’s society in different ways. However, it is right to give the meaning of justice as the principle of trying to bring fairness and well as the ideal of equality. Truth at the debate of criminal justice as well as law enforcement department justice since it has some different definitions. It merely means that each has a different meaning.However, despite the fact that truth has some definitions, these definitions can be complicated and vast but according to my understanding is that the person who has committed a particular crime to get punished for it. It makes the victim feel that they worth living again after seeing that the offender has been punished for the crime they have committed.

Nevertheless, a punishment that is entitled to the criminal or the offender usually entails either prison sentence which can vary according to the weight of the case or death penalty. As a student of criminal justice, it is my call and prayer that truth takes its path by punishing the offenders for the crime they have committed. Justice is carried out by many department or security authorities in the society such as the police, courts as well as the lawmaking individuals. Respecting the rule of law is one way of safeguarding the country’s democracy and a method of treating the victim fairly by punishing the offender will as well enhance democracy. Additionally, individuals on power are not supposed to make any decision on other life since it will be characterized by hate or beliefs and what was the law requires. The rule of law protects each is it in a politician; a citizen or people in power should be treated equally before the law and justice to prevail (Kunnan 10).

Justice lies in both legal and ethical political philosophy for law enforcement by punishing the offenders according to their actions. Justice is most interchanged with the term fairness in any given situation. Be it in a courtroom, workplace or just around the streets we all need to be treated fairly. All human being are equal, and for the law enforcement process, all individuals should get viewed under the law as similar. As per the offenders they also have a same right before the law. Our origin, color or status should be used to as a tool of judgment, but we deserve equal treatment and justice. Since we all have a desire to be treated equally justice is used as a determinant of reasonable and just society.

However, I can state that justice up to date remains a complicated concept to pin since each has their way f understanding what justice means. More often individuals disagree that as for they have not received any truth if they were not getting treated in an equal way. Equality is seen to be a significant component of justice, and most individuals argue that even the governments itself do not embrace equality. It is stated that the government should try to put into practice the distributive justice in the allocation of resources such as land to all the citizens. Color should not be a defining matter how we enjoy our fundamental rights. In this kind of disagreement on what justice is and what question leads to an unstable society and justice personified mostly will remain blindfold.

Mostly issues related to justice rise in a situation where an individual or group of individuals feels like they have not been getting treated fairly. Hence for justice to take its path the society must take part in fighting such conflict and stopping it by ensuring that each person is entitled to what they are supposed to have. More so if there is justice in a society, we can be sure of a brighter future for our kids and understand that what the forefathers fought for while fighting for justice and freedom from the slavery.

According to the equal justice exist in the present as well as the parameters of equality. Whenever there is equality in social justice must be there and prevailing hence no cases of injustice that are experienced or heard. As per the ethical category, justice has defined a matter of fairness where similar cases get treated as well as punished similarly. For instance, all the thieves are supposed to be punished the same way no matter their race or gender. Since in its legal perspective it is defined as the ideal to justly recognized and treated people in accordance to their doings. The main reason as to why it is according to their doing is because norms, justice, time are not equivalent. Hence it means that an individual judgment may be made on a case, but the public may not be happy about it. It does not seem necessary or fair according to the public eye, but in the eyes of a judge or court, the judgment gets administered fairly. In the world, today justice means after one is accused of committing a particular crime they appear before a judge, and present a case, and according to their presentation, a judge may decide if the person is guilty or not guilty. Therefore, the word justice will remain despite the fact that the processes of justice have changed for a particular time. As I had stated earlier, that whatever can be said to be justice according to the rule of law, cannot be taken into consideration as morally justice in the public eye. However, a correct punishment that will be fair to the victim should not be a matter of ethically right judgment but rather equilibrium. Real justice is an equilibrium that must come into creation between the victim and the wrongdoer. The victim must be served with justice by punishing the wrongdoer (Mika 75).

More so, for justice to take place, a crime must be equally paid, not only justly but equally. For instance, in the case where a thief has stolen money the amount should be returned double. The same argument applies to the murderer. If ne takes the life of another individual the same case should apply to them. Therefore, this is what justice is when punishment is equal to the crime committed. However, there are many cases where a criminal cannot pay the same for the evil they have done (Johnson 26). For instance, if it is a case of torture and starvation, the court cannot order one to be starved too and tortured as well. Same applies to the rape case; a rape criminal cannot also be raped. Additionally, in the case where a murderer has killed several people in a row cannot be destroyed a multiple time. That is not possible; he or she will be treated as the murder of one victim. Hence, this is fair, and it is justice too. In conclusion, the truth is no longer viewed as a moral justice but rather a payback of what one has done, where the victims are given equal punishment for their crimes.

Works cited

Mika, Harry, and Howard Zehr. “Fundamental concepts of restorative justice.” Restorative Justice. Routledge, 2017. 73-81.

Kunnan, Antony John. “Fairness and justice for all.” Fairness and validation in language assessment 9 (2000): 1-14.

Johnson, Norman J., and James H. Svara. Justice for all: Promoting social equity in public administration. Routledge, 2015.

SEARCH

Top-right-side-AD-min
WHY US?

Calculate Your Order




Standard price

$310

SAVE ON YOUR FIRST ORDER!

$263.5

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Pop-up Message