A Defense of Homosexuality by John Corvino Analysis
The essay “A Defense of Homosexuality” by John Corvino talks about the lives of homosexuals and their sexual relationships. The homosexuals find pleasure in performing the sexual activity which provides them lasting fulfillment. Unlike the heterosexual couples who can produce children, the homosexuals cannot produce children, but they get significant benefits through their relationships. The author claims that homosexual sex is not natural activity between two couples which seems abnormal in the eyes of society. The study of gay reveals that even animals are found having homosexual relationships.
The lifestyle chosen by the homosexual people is not inflicted upon them by anyone, it is their free will to choose that lifestyle because they are born with that assumption of fulfilling their dreams with homosexuality. It is an immoral choice for a lifestyle; they find the certain same-sex people attractive and fall in love with them. Both homosexuality and heterosexuality include options of people involved in it.
Various human organs have different purposes; they use their other organs naturally but use their sexual organs unnaturally. They use their reproductive organs to celebrate, express love, enhance their relationships and control each other’s feelings. The process is not procreative therefore it is fair for the church people to condemn it; their relationships are always infertile as it is almost impossible for a woman to get pregnant in a homosexual relationship. There is no argument that the sex between a male-male is wrong. It is instead a disgusting relationship between the two individuals who cross the boundaries and norms of the society and create their judgment about morality.
Not only homosexual sex is sinful, but the activity is also harmful to both individuals. They can easily transfer AIDS to each other according to the statistics. The researchers have found out that homosexual persons do not reveal their identities to the public or in the interviews during jobs. It could lead to workplace complexities and high rate of crime as well.
There is a lot of homosexuals in New York and San Francisco; it is also wrong for the women to have sex with men when there is the danger of spreading of HIV to the other partner. The homosexuality may be a human component of personal fulfillment for such individuals; they get sexually active frequently just like any other couple by paying the price of their decision. The example of Tommy and Jim as a male couple provides a very different picture though; they not only claim that they fulfill each other’s wishes but also become productive for the society and create no harm to the community.
The more significant emphasis should be given on the condemnation of homosexuality because the bible teaches against this activity. If homosexuals can turn to religion, they can have knowledge of the Bible which condemns these acts of pleasure. The Bible prohibits eating pork and teaches to obey the Christ in the earthly matters with the fear of God. It is immoral for the couples to become homosexuals from the religion point of view. Since the Biblical times, the economic conditions have changed these days dramatically. Now the technology has enabled people to adopt a lifestyle of their choice. But the teachings of Bible will still differ from the contemporary interests of homosexual individuals. Therefore the conclusion is that there are substantial religious and moral grounds on which the activity of homosexuality must be discouraged.
References
Corvino, John. A Defense Of Homosexuality. 1st ed. Print.
